Comparison of nonhomogeneous and homogeneous mass transfer in reverse osmosis membrane processes

References

• Y. Zhao, J.S. Taylor, Incorporation of osmotic pressure in an integrated incremental model for predicting RO or NF permeate concentration. Desalination 174 (2005) 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Zhao, J.S. Taylor, Assessment of ASTM D 4516 for evaluation of reverse osmosis membrane performance. Desalination 180 (2005) 231–244.
   Google Scholar
• K. Jamal, M.A. Khan, M. Kamil, Mathematical modeling of reverse osmosis system. Desalination 160 (2004) 29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhao, J.S. Taylor, S. Chellam, Predicting RO/NF water quality by modified solution diffusion model and artificial neural networks. J. Membr. Sci. 263 (2005) 38–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.J. Duranceau, Modeling the permeate transient response to pertubation from steady state in a nanofiltration process. Desal. Water Treat. 1 (2009) 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.P.S. Ramani, Mass transport mechenism of the high-pressure side in reverse osmosis: an analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 47 (1991) 4099–4105.
   Google Scholar
• B. Absar, O. Belhamiti, Reverse osmosis modeling with orthogonal collocation of finite element method. Desal. Water Treat. 21 (2010) 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cheddie, A. Maharajh, A. Ramkhalawan, P. Persad, Transient modeling of wave powered reverse osmosis. Desalination 260 (2010) 153–160.
   Google Scholar
• K. Spiegler, O. Kedem, Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): Criteria for efficient membrane. Desalination 1 (1966) 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• N. Park, S. Lee, S.-H. Lee, Mass transfer of bacterial by-product (BBP) during nanofiltration: Characterizations, transport, and sherwood relationships. Desalination 247 (2009) 623–635.
   Google Scholar
• V. Gekas, B. Hallstrom, Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow-critical literature review and adaptation of existing sherwood correlations to membrane operations. J. Membr. Sci. 30 (1987) 153–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Gekas, K. Olund, Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow-applucation of the chaacterization of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 37 (1988) 145–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Li, W. Meindersma, A.B. Haan, T. Reith, Optimization of commercial net spacers in spiral wound membrane modules. J. Membr. Sci. 208 (2002) 289–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Avlonitis, D.G. Pavlou, S. Skourtis, Simulation of the spiral wound RO membranes deformation under operating conditions. Desal. Water Treat. 25 (2011) 91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.Y. Yip, A. Tiraferri, W.A. Phillip, J.D. Schiffman, M. Elimelech, High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010) 3812–3818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.M.S. Ghiu, R.P. Carnahan, M. Barger, Permeability of electrolytes through a flat RO membrane in a direct osmosis study. Desalination 144 (2002) 387–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.M. Vrijenhoek, S. Hong, M. Elimelech, Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Elimelech, X. Zhu, A. Childress, S. Hong, Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 127 (1997) 101–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATLAB version 7.10.0. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• N.A. Gjostein, Non-Homogeneous Diffusion. Diffusion (Chapter 9). American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Zhao (2004). Modeling of Membrane Solute Mass Transfer in NF/RO System Membrane Systems. PhD dissertation, University of Central Florida.
   Google Scholar
• S.S. Chen, Modeling of Membrane Surface Chemistry and Mass Transfor., PhD dissertation, University of Central Florida, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• L-K. Sung, Film-Theory and Ion Coupling Models for Diffusion Controlled Membrane Processes, PhD dissertation, University of Central Florida, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• J.S. Taylor,E.P. Jacobs, Reverse osmosis and nano-filtration,in J. Malleviablle, P.E. Odendaal ,M.R. Wiesner, Water treatment membrane process (Chapter 9), McGraw-Hill,1996.
   Google Scholar
• Standard practice for standardizing reverse osmosis performance data. (2010). Annual Book of ADTM Standards. D4516–65.
   Google Scholar
• C.R. Bouchard, P.J. Carreau, T. Matsuura, S. Sourirajan, Modeling of ultrafiltration: Prediction of concentration polarization effect. J. Membr. Sci. 97 (1994) 215–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Wiesner, R. Aptel, Mass transport and permeate flux and fouling in pressure-driven process, in J. Mal-levialle, P.E. Odendaal, M.R. Wiesner, Water Treatment Membrane Processes (Chapter 4), McGraw-Hill,1996.
   Google Scholar
• M. Isaacson, A. Sonin. Sherwood number and friction factor correlations for electrodialysis system, with application to process optimization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 15(2) (1976) 313–321.
   Google Scholar
• L. Song, P. Johnson, M. Elimelech, Kinetics of colloid deposition onto heterogeneously charged surfaces in porous media. Enviorn. Sci. Technol. 28 (1994) 1164–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar