A statistical study of the effect of preparation conditions on the structure and performance of thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes

References

• W.J. Lau, A.F. Ismail, N. Misdan, M.A. Kassim, A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: A review, Desalination 287 (2012) 190–199.10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Dhumal, A.K. Suresh, A comprehensive model for kinetics and development of film structure in interfacial polycondensation, Polymer 50 (2009) 5851–5864.10.1016/j.polymer.2009.09.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Dhumal, A.K. Suresh, Understanding interfacial polycondensation: Experiments on polyurea system and comparison with theory, Polymer 51 (2010) 1176–1190.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Freger, S. Srebnik, Mathematical model of charge and density distributions in interfacial polymerization of thin films, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 88 (2003) 1162–1169.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Ghosh, B.-H. Jeong, X. Huang, E.M.V. Hoek, Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties, J. Membr. Sci. 311 (2008) 34–45.10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.L. Ahmad, B.S. Ooi, Properties–performance of thin film composites membrane: Study on trimesoyl chloride content and polymerization time, J. Membr. Sci. 255 (2005) 67–77.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.Y. Kwak, S.G. Jung, S.H. Kim, Structure–motion–performance relationship of flux-enhanced reverse osmosis (RO) membranes composed of aromatic polyamide thin films, Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 4334–4340.10.1021/es010630g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Qiu, L. Wu, L. Zhang, H. Chen, C. Gao, Preparation of reverse osmosis composite membrane with high flux by interfacial polymerization of MPD and TMC, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112 (2009) 2066–2072.10.1002/app.v112:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.K. Saha, S.V. Joshi, Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type, J. Membr. Sci. 342 (2009) 60–69.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yi, Y. Su, B. Qi, Z. Su, Y. Wan, Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design in optimizing the preparation conditions of vinyltriethoxysilane modified silicalite/polydimethylsiloxane hybrid pervaporation membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 71 (2010) 252–262.10.1016/j.seppur.2009.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.F. Ismail, P.Y. Lai, Development of defect-free asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation using response surface methodology, Sep. Purif. Technol. 40 (2004) 191–207.10.1016/j.seppur.2004.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Madaeni, N. Arast, F. Rahimpour, Y. Arast, Fabrication optimization of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) nanofiltration membrane using response surface methodology, Desalination 280 (2011) 305–312.10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Khayet, C. Cojocaru, M. Essalhi, Artificial neural network modeling and response surface methodology of desalination by reverse osmosis, J. Membr. Sci. 368 (2011) 202–214.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Xiangli, W. Wei, Y. Chen, W. Jin, N. Xu, Optimization of preparation conditions for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/ceramic composite pervaporation membranes using response surface methodology, J. Membr. Sci. 311 (2008) 23–33.10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Namvar-Mahboub, M. Pakizeh, Optimization of preparation conditions of polyamide thin film composite membrane for organic solvent nanofiltration, J. Chem. Eng. 31 (2014) 327–337.10.1007/s11814-013-0213-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.L. Lind, A.K. Ghosh, A. Jawor, X. Huang, W. Hou, Y. Yang, E.M.V. Hoek, Influence of zeolite crystal size on zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes, Langmuir 25 (2009) 10139–10145.10.1021/la900938x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.E. Mickols, Composite membrane and method for making the same, in: US Patent No. 6337018 B1, Jan. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• J.-Y. Koo, J.-E. Kim,W.-J. Kimand K.S. Park, Composite polyamide reverse osmosis membrane and method of producing the same, in: US Patent No. 6245234 B1, June 2001.
   Google Scholar
• W.W. Hines, D.C. Montgomery, Probability and Statistics in Engineering and Management Science, third ed., Wiley, New York, NY, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology, Wiley, New York, NY, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Gohil, A.K. Suresh, Development of high flux thin-film composite membrane for water desalination: A statistical study using response surface methodology, Desalin. Water Treat. 52 (2014) 5219–5228.10.1080/19443994.2013.809025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.D. Broota, Experimental Design in Behavioural Research, New Age International (P) Ltd Publishers, New Delhi, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• A. Idris, F. Kormin, M.Y. Noordin, Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of thin film composite membrane, Sep. Purif. Technol. 49 (2006) 271–280.10.1016/j.seppur.2005.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Jin, W. Wang, Z. Su, Spectroscopic study on water diffusion in aromatic polyamide thin film, J. Membr. Sci. 379 (2011) 121–130.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Morra, E. Occhiello, F. Garbassi, Knowledge about polymer surfaces from contact angle measurements, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 32 (1990) 79–116.10.1016/0001-8686(90)80012-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Jin, Z. Su, Effects of polymerization conditions on hydrophilic groups in aromatic polyamide thin films, J. Membr. Sci. 330 (2009) 175–179.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar