Molecular weight distributions in cotton-dyeing textile wastewaters

References

• A. Bes-Piá, A. Iborra-Clar, C. García-Figueruelo, S. Barredo-Damas, M.I. Alcaina-Miranda, J.A. Mendoza-Roca, M.I. Iborra-Clar, Comparison of three NF membranes for the reuse of secondary textile effluents, Desalination 241 (2009) 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Oller, S. Malato, J.A. Sánchez-Pérez, Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination—A review, Sci. Total Environ. 409 (2011) 4141–4166.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Sarayu, S. Sandhya, Current technologies for biological treatment of textile wastewater–A review, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 167 (2012) 645–661.10.1007/s12010-012-9716-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Calace, A. Liberatori, B.M. Petronio, M. Pietroletti, Characteristics of different molecular weight fractions of organic matter in landfill leachate and their role in soil sorption of heavy metals, Environ. Pollut. 113 (2001) 331–339.10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00186-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Sophonsiri, E. Morgenroth, Chemical composition associated with different particle size fractions in municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastewaters, Chemosphere, 55 (2004).691–703.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Kjeldsen, M. Barlaz, A. Rooker, A. Baun, A. Ledin, T. Christensen, Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: A review, Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 32 (2002) 297–336.10.1080/10643380290813462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Chen, J. Liu, Landfill leachate treatment by MBR: Performance and molecular weight distribution of organic contaminant, Chin. Sci. Bull. 51 (2006) 2831–2838.10.1007/s11434-006-2177-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Zhao, J.T. Novak, C.D. Goldsmith, Evaluation of on-site biological treatment for landfill leachates and its impact: A size distribution study, Water Res. 46 (2012) 3837–3848.10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Campagna, M. Çakmakcı, F.B. Büşra Yaman, B. Özkaya, Molecular weight distribution of a full-scale landfill leachate treatment by membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration membrane, Waste Manage. 33 (2013) 866–870.10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Dulekgurgen, S. Doğruel, Ö. Karahan, D. Orhon, Size distribution of wastewater COD fractions as an index for biodegradability, Water Res. 40 (2006) 273–282.10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Chian, Stability of organic matter in landfill leachates, Water Res. 11 (1977) 225–232.10.1016/0043-1354(77)90130-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Uner, S. Dogruel, I. Arslan-Alaton, F.G. Babuna, D. Orhon, Evaluation of coagulation-flocculation on a COD-based molecular size distribution for a textile finishing mill effluent, J. Environ. Sci. Health., Part A 41 (2006) 1899–1908.10.1080/10934520600779158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Malpei, A. Rozzi, S. Colli, M. Uberti, Size distribution of TOC in mixed municipal-textile effluents after biological and advanced treatment, J. Membr. Sci. 131 (1997) 71–83.10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00029-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.C. Ged, T.H. Boyer, Molecular weight distribution of phosphorus fraction of aquatic dissolved organic matter, Chemosphere 91 (2013) 921–927.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Qian, X. Sun, Y. Liu, Removal characteristics of organics in bio-treated textile wastewater reclamation by a stepwise coagulation and intermediate GAC/O3 oxidation process, Chem. Eng. J. 214 (2013) 112–118.10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA (American Public Health Association), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, twentieth ed., APHA, Washington, DC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• C. Berthe, E. Redon, G. Feuillade, Fractionation of the organic matter contained in leachate resulting from two modes of landfilling: An indicator of waste degradation, J. Hazard. Mater. 154 (2008) 262–271.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Li, D. Yue, J. Liu, Y. Nie, Size fractionation of organic matter and heavy metals in raw and treated leachate, Waste Manage. 29 (2009) 2527–2533.10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Albrektienė, M. Rimeika, E. Zalieckienė, V. Šaulys, A. Zagorskis, Determination of organic matter by UV absorption in the ground water, J. Environ. Eng. Landscape 20 (2012) 163–167.10.3846/16486897.2012.674039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.K. Edzwald, J.E. Tobiason, Enhanced coagulation: Us requirements and a broader view, Water Sci. Technol 40 (1999) 63–70.10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00641-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Kristiana, C. Joll, A. Heitz, Powdered activated carbon coupled with enhanced coagulation for natural organic matter removal and disinfection by-product control: Application in a Western Australian water treatment plant, Chemosphere 83 (2011) 661–667.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Fan, Y. Tao, L. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Lei, Z. Wang, H. Noguchi, Performance of an integrated process combining ozonation with ceramic membrane ultra-filtration for advanced treatment of drinking water, Desalination. 335 (2014) 47–54.10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mojiri, H. Abdul Aziz, Q.Z. Nastaein, Q.A. Shuokr, A review on anaerobic digestion, bio-reactor and nitrogen removal from wastewater and landfill leachate by bio-reactor. Adv. Environ. Biol. 6(7) (2012) 2143–2150.
   Google Scholar
• T. Leiviskä, H. Nurmesniemi, R. Pöykiö, J. Rämö, T. Kuokkanen, J. Pellinen, Effect of biological wastewater treatment on the molecular weight distribution of soluble organic compounds and on the reduction of BOD, COD and P in pulp and paper mill effluent, Water Res. 42 (2008) 3952–3960.10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar