Membrane processes used for removal of pharmaceuticals, hormones, endocrine disruptors and their metabolites from wastewaters: a review

References

• M. Magureanua, N.B. Mandache, V.I. Parvulescu, Degradation of pharmaceutical compounds in water by non-thermal plasma treatment, Water Res. 81 (2015) 124–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Verlicchi, M.A. Aukidy, E. Zambello, Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in urban wastewater: Removal, mass load and environmental risk after a secondary treatment—A review, Sci. Total. Environ. 429 (2012) 123–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Rivera-Utrilla, M. Sánchez-Polo, M.Á. Ferro-García, G. Prados-Joya, R. Ocampo-Pérez, Pharmaceuticals as emerging contaminants and their removal from water. A review, Chemosphere 93 (2013) 1268–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.J.C. Coppens, J.A.G.v. Gils, T.L.t. Laak, B.W. Raterman, A.P.v. Wezel, Towards spatially smart abatement of human pharmaceuticals in surface waters: Defining impact of sewage treatment plants on susceptible functions, Water Res. 81 (2015) 356–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Simazaki, R. Kubota, T. Suzuki, M. Akiba, T. Nishimura, S. Kunikane, Occurrence of selected pharmaceuticals at drinking water purification plants in Japan and implications for human health, Water Res. 76 (2015) 187–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Judd, B. Jefferson, Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-use, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Z.F. Cui, H.S. Muralidhara, Membrane Technology: A Practical Guide to Membrane Technology and Applications in Food and Bioprocessing, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• X. Wang, K. Zhang, Y. Yang, L. Wang, Z. Zhou, M. Zhu, B.S. Hsiao, B. Chu, Development of hydrophilic barrier layer on nanofibrous substrate as composite membrane via a facile route, J. Membr. Sci. 356 (2010) 110–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.J. Benitez, J.L. Acero, F.J. Real, G. Roldán, E. Rodriguez, Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes applied to the removal of the pharmaceuticals amoxicillin, naproxen, metoprolol and phenacetin from water, J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 86 (2011) 858–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Sipma, B. Osuna, N. Collado, H. Monclús, G. Ferrero, J. Comas, I. Rodriguez-Roda, Comparison of removal of pharmaceuticals in MBR and activated sludge systems, Desalination 250 (2010) 653–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Tambosi, R.F.d. Sena, M. Favier, W. Gebhardt, H.J. José, H.F. Schröder, R.d.F.P.M. Moreira, Removal of pharmaceutical compounds in membrane bioreactors (MBR) applying submerged membranes, Desalination 261 (2010) 148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Kaya, G. Ersan, I. Vergili, Z.B. Gönder, G. Yilmaz, N. Dizge, C. Aydiner, The treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater using in a submerged membrane bioreactor under different sludge retention times, J. Membr. Sci. 442 (2013) 72–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Shirazian, S.N. Ashrafizadeh, Mass transfer simulation of caffeine extraction by subcritical CO2 in a hollow-fiber membrane contactor, Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 28 (2010) 267–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Cartinella, T.Y. Cath, M.T. Flynn, G.C. Miller, K.W. Hunter Jr., A.E. Childress, Removal of natural steroid hormones from wastewater using membrane contactor processes, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006) 7381–7386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.S. Williams, H.G. Gomaa, M.B. Ray, Effect of solvent immobilization on membrane separation of ibuprofen metabolite: A green and organic solvent analysis, Sep. Purif. Technol. 115 (2013) 57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mulder, Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• J. Wagner, Membrane Filtration Handbook Practical Tips and Hints, second ed., Osmonics, Minnetonka, US, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• E. Saljoughi, M. Sadrzadeh, T. Mohammadi, Effect of preparation variables on morphology and pure water permeation flux through asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 326 (2009) 627–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sadrzadeh, E. Saljoughi, K. Shahidi, T. Mohammadi, Preparation and characterization of a composite PDMS membrane on CA support, Polym. Adv. Technol. 21 (2009) 568–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Mahmoudi, E. Saljoughi, S.M. Mousavi, Promotion of polysulfone membrane by thermal-mechanical stretching process, J. Polym. Res. 20 (2013) 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.M.A. Razavi, S.M. Mousavi, S.A. Mortazavi, Dynamic prediction of milk ultra’ltration performance: A neural network approach, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 4185–4195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Amirilargani, E. Saljoughi, T. Mohammadi, Improvement of permeation performance of polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration membranes via addition of Tween-20, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 115 (2010) 504–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Shekarian, E. Saljoughi, A. Naderi, Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/IGEPAL blend asymmetric membranes: Preparation, morphology, and performance, J. Polym. Res. 20 (2013) 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Saljoughi, S.M. Mousavi, Preparation and characterization of novel polysulfone nanofiltration membranes for removal of cadmium from contaminated water, Sep. Purif. Technol. 90 (2012) 22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Saljoughi, M. Amirilargani, T. Mohammadi, Asymmetric cellulose acetate dialysis membranes: Synthesis, characterization, and performance, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 116 (2010) 2251–2259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pinelo, C. Ferrer, A.S. Meyer, G. Jonsson, Controlling the rejection of protein during membrane filtration by adding selected polyelectrolytes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 85 (2012) 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Saljoughi, M. Amirilargani, T. Mohammadi, Effect of PEG additive and coagulation bath temperature on the morphology, permeability and thermal/chemical stability of asymmetric CA membranes, Desalination 262 (2010) 72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. You, X. Li, Y. Yang, B. Wang, Z. Li, X. Wang, M. Zhu, B.S. Hsiao, High flux low pressure thin film nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes based on nanofibrous substrates, Sep. Purif. Technol. 108 (2013) 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Zazouli, H. Susanto, S. Nasseri, M. Ulbricht, Influences of solution chemistry and polymeric natural organic matter on the removal of aquatic pharmaceutical residuals by nanofiltration, Water Res. 43 (2009) 3270–3280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Yangali-Quintanilla, S.K. Maeng, T. Fujioka, M. Kennedy, G. Amy, Proposing nanofiltration as acceptable barrier for organic contaminants in water reuse, J. Membr. Sci. 362 (2010) 334–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Yoon, P. Westerhoff, S.A. Snyder, E.C. Wert, J. Yoon, Removal of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes, Desalination 202 (2007) 16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Snyder, S. Adham, A.M. Redding, F.S. Cannon, J. DeCarolis, J. Oppenheimer, E.C. Wert, Y. Yoon, Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals, Desalination 202 (2007) 156–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R.D. Verliefde, S.G.J. Heijman, E.R. Cornelissen, G. Amy, B.V.d. Bruggen, J.C.v. Dijk, Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water, Water Res. 41 (2007) 3227– 3240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Acero, F.J. Benitez, A.I. Leal, F.J. Real, F. Teva, Membrane filtration technologies applied to municipal secondary effluents for potential reuse, J. Hazard. Mater. 177 (2010) 390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Vergili, Application of nanofiltration for the removal of carbamazepine, diclofenac and ibuprofen from drinking water sources, J. Environ. Manage. 127 (2013) 177–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kimura, T. Iwase, S. Kita, Y. Watanabe, Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes, Water Res. 43 (2009) 3751–3758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Rana, B. Scheier, R.M. Narbaitz, T. Matsuura, S. Tabe, S.Y. Jasim, K.C. Khulbe, Comparison of cellulose acetate (CA) membrane and novel CA membranes containing surface modifying macromolecules to remove pharmaceutical and personal care product micropollutants from drinking water, J. Membr. Sci. 409–410 (2012) 346–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M. Narbaitz, D. Rana, H.T. Dang, J. Morrissette, T. Matsuura, S.Y. Jasim, S. Tabe, P. Yang, Pharmaceutical and personal care products removal from drinking water by modified cellulose acetate membrane: Field testing, Chem. Eng. J. 225 (2013) 848–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dolar, A. Vuković, D. Ašperger, K. Košutić, Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes, J. Environ. Sci. 23 (2011) 1299–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Omidvar, S.M. Mousavi, M. Soltanieh, A.A. Safekordi, Preparation and characterization of poly (ethersulfone) nanofiltration membranes for amoxicillin removal from contaminated water, J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 12 (2014) 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S.P. Sun, T.A. Hatton, S.Y. Chan, T.-S. Chung, Novel thin-film composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with double repulsion for effective removal of emerging organic matters from water, J. Membr. Sci. 401–402 (2012) 152–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Košutić, D. Dolar, D. Ašperger, B. Kunst, Removal of antibiotics from a model wastewater by RO/NF membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 53 (2007) 244–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gur-Reznik, I. Koren-Menashe, L. Heller-Grossman, O. Rufel, C.G. Dosoretz, Influence of seasonal and operating conditions on the rejection of pharmaceutical active compounds by RO and NF membranes, Desalination 277 (2011) 250–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Bérubé, Membrane Bioreactors: Theory and Applications to Wastewater Reuse, in Sustainability Science and Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2010
   Google Scholar
• S. Judd, The status of membrane bioreactor technology, Trends Biotechnol. 26 (2008) 109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.P. Shariati, M.R. Mehrnia, B.M. Salmasi, M. Heran, C. Wisniewski, M.H. Sarrafzadeh, Membrane bioreactor for treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing acetaminophen, Desalination 250 (2008) 798–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.S.A. Mutamim, Z.Z. Noor, M.A.A. Hassan, A. Yuniarto, G. Olsson, Membrane bioreactor: Applications and limitations in treating high strength industrial wastewater, Chem. Eng. J. 225 (2013) 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.S.A. Mutamim, Z.Z. Noor, M.A.A. Hassan, G. Olsson, Application of membrane bioreactor technology in treating high strength industrial wastewater: A performance review, Desalination 305 (2012) 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.K. Maeng, B.G. Choi, K.T. Lee, K.G. Song, Influences of solid retention time, nitrification and microbial activity on the attenuation of pharmaceuticals and estrogens in membrane bioreactors, Water Res. 47 (2013) 3155–3162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.D. Gusseme, L. Vanhaecke, W. Verstraete, N. Boon, Degradation of acetaminophen byDelftia tsuruhatensis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a membrane bioreactor, Water Res. 45 (2011) 1829–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Radjenovic, M. Petrovic, D. Barceló, Analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and removal using a membrane bioreactor, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387 (2007) 1365–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Radjenovic, M. Petrovic, D. Barcelo, Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment, Water Res. 43 (2009) 831–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Forrez, M. Carballa, G. Fink, A. Wick, T. Hennebel, L. Vanhaecke, T. Ternes, N. Boon, W. Verstraete, Biogenic metals for the oxidative and reductive removal of pharmaceuticals, biocides and iodinated contrast media in a polishing membrane bioreactor, Water Res. 45 (2011) 1763–1773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Reif, S. Suárez, F. Omil, J.M. Lema, Fate of pharmaceuticals and cosmetic ingredients during the operation of a MBR treating sewage, Desalination 221 (2008) 511–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Urase, C. Kagawa, T. Kikuta, Factors affecting removal of pharmaceutical substances and estrogens in membrane separation bioreactors, Desalination 178 (2005) 107–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.C. Wijekoon, F.I. Hai, J. Kang, W.E. Price, W. Guo, H.H. Ngo, L.D. Nghiem, The fate of pharmaceuticals, steroid hormones, phytoestrogens, UV-filters and pesticides during MBR treatment, Bioresour. Technol. 144 (2013) 247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Clara, N. Kreuzinger, B. Strenn, O. Gans, H. Kroiss, The solids retention time—A suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants, Water Res. 39 (2005) 97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bernhard, J. Muller, T.P. Knepper, Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater: Comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment, Water Res. 40 (2006) 3419–3428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Joss, E. Keller, A.C. Alder, A.G. ¨Bel, C.S. McArdell, T. Ternes, H. Siegrist, Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment, Water Res. 39 (2005) 3139–3152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Serrano, S. Suarez, J.M. Lema, F. Omil, Removal of persistent pharmaceutical micropollutants from sewage by addition of PAC in a sequential membrane bioreactor, Water Res. 45 (2011) 5323–5333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kimura, H. Hara, Y. Watanabe, Removal of pharmaceutical compounds by submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs), Desalination 178 (2005) 135–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Clara, B. Strenn, O. Gans, E. Martinez, N. Kreuzinger, H. Kroiss, Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants, Water Res. 39 (2005) 4797–4807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Abegglen, A. Joss, C.S. McArdell, G. Fink, M.P. Schlu¨sener, T.A. Ternes, H. Siegrist, The fate of selected micropollutants in a single-house MBR, Water Res. 43 (2009) 2036–2046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.D. Gusseme, B. Pycke, T. Hennebel, A. Marcoen, S.E. Vlaeminck, H. Noppe, N. Boon, W. Verstraete, Biological removal of 17a-ethinylestradiol by a nitrifier enrichment culture in a membrane bioreactor, Water Res. 43 (2009) 2493–2503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. López-Fernández, L. Martínez, S. Villaverde, Membrane bioreactor for the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing corticosteroids, Desalination 300 (2012) 2493–2503.
   Google Scholar
• P. Grelier, S. Rosenberger, A. Tazi-Pain, Influence of sludge retention time on membrane bioreactor hydraulic performance, Desalination 192 (2006) 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gugliuzza, A.B. Asile, Membrane Contactors: Fundamentals, Membrane Materials and Key Operations, Woodhead, Cambridge, UK, 2013
   Google Scholar
• J.G. Crespo, I.M. Coelhoso, R.M.C. Viegas, Membrane Contactors: Membrane Separations, Academic Press, Curia, Portugal, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• E. Drioli, A. Criscuoli, E. Curcio, Membrane Contactors: Fundumentals, Applications and Potentialities, in Membrane Science and Technology Series, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• N.S. Williams, M.B. Ray, H.G. Gomaa, Removal of ibuprofen and 4-isobutylacetophenone by non-dispersive solvent extraction using a hollow fibre membrane contactor, Sep. Purif. Technol. 88 (2012) 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.S. Nasirabadi, Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater by membrane contactor, in Department of Chemical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2013
   Google Scholar
• P. Dz˙ygiel, P.P. Wieczorek, Supported Liquid Membranes and Their Modifications: Definition, Classification, Theory, Stability, Application and Perspectives, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2010
   Google Scholar
• S. Phuntsho, S. Hong, M. Elimelech, H.K. Shon, Osmotic equilibrium in the forward osmosis process: Modelling, experiments and implications for process performance, J. Membr. Sci. 453 (2014) 240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Jin, J. Shan, C. Wang, J. Wei, C.Y. Tang, Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes, J. Hazard. Mater. 227–228 (2012) 55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Prince, D. Rana, G. Singh, T. Matsuura, T.J. Kai, T.S. Shanmugasundaram, Effect of hydrophobic surface modifying macromolecules on differently produced PVDF membranes for direct contact membrane distillation, Chem. Eng. J. 242 (2014) 387–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.C.C. Yang, C.-H. Yen, The use of different materials to form the intermediate layers of tubular carbon nanofibers/carbon/alumina composite membranes for removing pharmaceuticals from aqueous solutions, J. Membr. Sci. 425–426 (2013) 121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.C. Jara, D. Fino, V. Specchia, G. Saracco, P. Spinelli, Electrochemical removal of antibiotics from wastewaters, Appl. Catal. 70 (2007) 479–487.
   Google Scholar
• S. Miralles-Cuevas, A. Arqués, M.I. Maldonado, J.A. Sánchez-Pérez, S.M. Rodríguez, Combined nanofiltration and photo-Fenton treatment of water containing micropollutants, Chem. Eng. J. 224 (2013) 89–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Laera, M.N. Chong, B. Jin, A. Lopez, An integrated MBR–TiO2 photocatalysis process for the removal of Carbamazepine from simulated pharmaceutical industrial effluent, Bioresour. Technol. 102 (2011) 7012–7015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mozia, A.W. Morawski, The performance of a hybrid photocatalysis–MD system for the treatment of tap water contaminated with ibuprofen, Catal. Today. 193 (2012) 213–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yang, R.C. Flowers, H.S. Weinberg, P.C. Singer, Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in an advanced wastewater reclamation plant, Water Res. 45 (2011) 5218–5228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Xue, C. Wu, K. Xiao, X. Huang, H. Zhou, H. Tsuno, H. Tanaka, Elimination and fate of selected micro-organic pollutants in a full-scale anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic process combined with membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater reclamation, Water Res. 44 (2010) 5999–6010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Saravia, F.H. Frimmel, Role of NOM in the performance of adsorption-membrane hybrid systems applied for the removal of pharmaceuticals, Desalination 224 (2008) 168–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Sahar, I. David, Y. Gelman, H. Chikurel, A. Aharoni, R. Messalem, A. Brenner, The use of RO to remove emerging micropollutants following CAS/UF or MBR treatment of municipal wastewater, Desalination 273 (2011) 142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Senta, M. Matŏsić, H.K. Jakopović, S. Terzic, J. Ćurko, I. Mijatović, Removal of antimicrobials using advanced wastewater treatment, J. Hazard. Mater. 192 (2011) 319–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Pollice, G. Laera, D. Cassano, S. Diomede, A. Pinto, A. Lopez, G. Mascolo, Removal of nalidixic acid and its degradation products by an integrated MBR-ozonation system, J. Hazard. Mater. 203–204 (2012) 46–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dolar, M. Gros, S. Rodriguez-Mozaz, J. Moreno, J. Comas, I. Rodriguez-Roda, D. Barceló, Removal of emerging contaminants from municipal wastewater with an integrated membrane system, MBR–RO, J. Hazard. Mater. 239–240 (2012) 64–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.L. Alpatova, S.H. Davies, S.J. Masten, Hybrid ozonation-ceramic membrane filtration of surface waters: The effect of water characteristics on permeate flux and the removal of DBP precursors, dicloxacillin and ceftazidime, Sep. Purif. Technol. 107 (2013) 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.D. Kim, J. Cho, I.S. Kim, B.J. Vanderford, S.A. Snyder, Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking, and waste waters, Water Res. 41 (2007) 1013–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Radjenovic, M. Petrovic, F. Ventura, D. Barcelo, Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment, Water Res. 42 (2008) 3601–3610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.C. Sarasidis, K.V. Plakas, S.I. Patsios, A.J. Karabelas, Investigation of diclofenac degradation in a continuous photo-catalytic membrane reactor. Influence of operating parameters, Chem. Eng. J. 239 (2014) 299–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bodzek, M. Dudziak, Removal of natural estrogens and synthetic compounds considered to be endocrine disrupting substances (EDs) by coagulation and nanofiltration, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 15 (2006) 35–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar