Democracy, Philosophy, and the Selection of Capabilities

References

• Alkire, Sabina. 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109 (2): 287–337. doi: 10.1086/233897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2003. “Sen, Ethics, and Democracy.” Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 239–261. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000077953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argenton, Carlo, and Enzo Rossi. 2013. “Pluralism, Preferences, and Deliberation: A Critique of Sen's Constructive Argument for Democracy.” Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (2): 129–145. doi: 10.1111/josp.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, James, and William Rehg. 1997. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, Tania, and Polly Vizard. 2007. Definition of Equality and Framework for Measurement: Final Recommendations of the Equalities Review Steering Group on Measurement (CASE discussion paper no. 120). The ESCR Research Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Ian. 1996. “The Concept of Freedom in the Work of Amartya Sen: An Alternative Analysis Consistent with Freedom's Independent Value.” Notizie Di Politeia 43/44: 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Ian. 2014. “Is the Capability Approach Paternalist?” Economics & Philosophy 30 (1): 75–98. doi: 10.1017/S0266267114000054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, Rutger. 2011. “Making Capability Lists: Philosophy Versus Democracy.” Political Studies 59 (3): 491–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00862.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, David A. 2002. Visions of Development: A Study of Human Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, David A. 2008. Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer, ed. 2014. “Two Pictures of Justice.” In Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, 17–37. Maiden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frediani, Alexandre Apsan 2007. “A Participatory Approach to Choosing Dimensions.” Maitreyee, E-bulletin of the HDCA 7: 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, Solava, and Sabina Alkire. 2007. “Agency and Empowerment: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators.” Oxford Development Studies 35 (4): 379–403. doi: 10.1080/13600810701701897
   Google Scholar
• Jaggar, Alison M. 2006. “Reasoning About Well-being: Nussbaum's Methods of Justifying the Capabilities.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3): 301–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsaretti, Serena. 2005. “Endorsement and Freedom in Amartya Sen's Capability Approach.” Economics and Philosophy 21: 89–108. doi: 10.1017/S0266267104000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 2001. “Capability and Freedom: A Defence of Sen.” Economics and Philosophy 17 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1017/S0266267101000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 2009. “4 Freedom in the Spirit of Sen.” In Amartya Sen, edited by Christopher Morris, 91–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, Renee. 2005. “The Concept of Freedom and Its Relation to Economic Development—A Critical Appreciation of the Work of Amartya Sen.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 29 (6): 1145–1170. doi: 10.1093/cje/bei081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Henry. 2002. Democratic Autonomy. Public Reasoning About the Ends of Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005a. “Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement.” Social Indicators Research 74 (1): 191–215. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005b. “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey.” Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 93–117. doi: 10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, Ingrid. 2011. “The Capability Approach.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta, ed. Accessed September 19. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/capability-approach/
   Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2007. “Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality.” The Journal of Political Philosophy. 16 (2): 137–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 2002. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de-Shalit, Avner. 2004. “Political Philosophy and Empowering Citizens.” Political Studies 52 (4): 802–818. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, Sharath. 2007. “No Democracy Without Justice: Political Freedom in Amartya Sen's Capability Approach.” Journal of Human Development 8 (3): 457–480. doi: 10.1080/14649880701462395
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 1985. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.” In Philosophy and the Human Sciences, edited by Charles Taylor, 15–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vallentyne, Peter. 2005. “Debate: Capabilities Versus Opportunities for Well-being.” Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (3): 359–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizard, Polly. 2010. “Developing and Agreeing a Capability List in the British Context: What Can Be Learnt from Social Survey Data on ‘Rights’?”
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. 1981. “Philosophy and Democracy.” Political Theory 9 (3): 379–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. 1985. “Interpretation and Social Criticism.” Paper presented at The Tanner Lectures on Human Values Delivered at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, November 13–14.
   Google Scholar