On “Consequentialism” and the Capability Approach

References

• Alkire, S., M. Qizilbash, and F. Comim. 2008. “Introduction.” In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, edited by F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, and S. Alkire, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. 2006. “Freedom and Social Choice: Notes from the Margin.” Utilitas 18: 52–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820805001822.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. 2015. “A Third Method of Ethics?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 257–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00607.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker, B. 2000. Ideal Code, Real World. A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R. 2021. “Capability, Opportunity, Outcome and Equality.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by E. Chiappero-Martinetti, S. Osmani, and M. Qizilbash, 333–346. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kynch, J., and A. Sen. 1983. “Indian Women: Well-Being and Survival.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 7: 363–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.93/cje/7.3-4.363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2014. “Introduction. Capabilities, Challenges, and the Omnipresence of Political Liberalism.” In Capabilities, Gender, Equality, edited by F. Comim, and M. Nussbaum, 1–16. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2021. “The Capabilities Approach and the History of Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by E. Chiappero-Martinetti, S. Osmani, and M. Qizilbash, 13–39. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osmani, S. 2008. “The Sen System of Social Evaluation.” In Arguments for A Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Volume I. Ethics, Welfare and Measurement, edited by K. Basu, and R. Kanbur, 15–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qizilbash, M. 2007. “Social Choice and Individual Capabilities.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6: 169–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X07077271.
   Google Scholar
• Qizilbash, M. 2008. “Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Insightful Sketch or Distorted Picture?” In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, edited by F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, and S. Alkire, 53–81. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qizilbash, M. 2012. “The Capability Approach: Its Interpretation and ‘Limitations’.” In The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, edited by F. Panzironi, and K. Gelber, 9–22. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Qizilbash, M. 2016. “Utilitarianism and Some of Its Critics: On Some Alternative ‘Incomplete’ Theories of, and Approaches to, Morality and Justice.” In Theorizing Justice: Critical Insights and Future Directions, edited by K. Watane, and J. Drydyk, 75–94. London & New York: Rowman Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Qizilbash, M. 2019. “On ‘Affluent Philosophy’ and Future Generations: Amartya Sen and Tim Mulgan’s ‘Broken World’.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 20: 145–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2018.1563053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qizilbash, M. forthcoming. “In Defence of Inclusiveness: On Sustainable Human Development, Capability and Indicators of Progress.” In Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities, edited by P. B. Anand, F. Comim, and S. Fennel. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice. The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. 2001. “Symposium on Amartya Sen’s Philosophy: 3 Sen and Consequentialism.” Economics and Philosophy 17: 39–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/SO26626710100013X.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, S. 1988. “Introduction.” In Consequentialism and its Critics, edited by S. Sheffler, 1–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1974. “Informational Bases of Alternative Welfare Approaches: Aggregation and Income Distribution.” Journal of Public Economics 3: 387–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90006-1.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1979a. “Utilitarianism and Welfarism.” The Journal of Philosophy 76 (9): 463–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2025934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1979b. “Informational Analysis of Moral Principles.” In Rational Action, edited by R. Harrison, 115–132. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1982a. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1982b. “Rights and Agency.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 11: 3–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1983. “Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12: 113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1984. “Rights and Capabilities.” In Resources, Values and Development, edited by A. Sen, 307–324. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1985. “Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984.” Journal of Philosophy LXXXII: 169–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics out of Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1990. “Welfare, Freedom and Social Choice: A Reply.” Recherches Economique de Louvain 56: 451–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0770451800043992.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Re-Examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1993. “Capability and Well-Being.” In The Quality of Life, edited by M. Nussbaum, and A. Sen, 30–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1997. “Maximization and the Act of Choice.” Econometrica 65: 745–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2171939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2000. “Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason.” The Journal of Philosophy 97, 477–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2678488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2001. “Symposium on Amartya Sen’s Philosophy: 4 Reply.” Economics and Philosophy 17: 51–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267101000141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2004a. “Incompleteness and Reasoned Choice.” Synthese 140: 43–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000029940.51537.b3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2004b. “Dialogue: Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation.” Feminist Economics 10: 77–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.10/1354570042000315163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2009a. The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2009b. “Capability: Reach and Limits.” In Debating Global Society. Reach and Limits of the Capability Approach, edited by E. Chiappero-Martinetti, 15–28. Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2017a. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Expanded Edition. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2017b. “Reason and Justice: The Optimal and the Maximal.” Philosophy 92: 5–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S00318196000309.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2018. “The Importance of Incompleteness.” International Journal of Economic Theory 14: 9–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A., and R. Kanbur. 1987. “The Standard of Living: Uncertainty, Inequality and Opportunity.” In The Standard of Living, edited by G. Hawthorn, 59–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A., and B. Williams. 1981. “Introduction; Utilitarianism and Beyond.” In Utililtarianism and Beyond, edited by A. Sen, and B. Williams, 1–21. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slote, M. 1984. “Satisficing Consequentialism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58: 139–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/58.1.139.
   Google Scholar
• Suzumura, K. 1999. “Consequences, Opportunities and Procedures.” Social Choice and Welfare 16: 17–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s0035550050129.
   Google Scholar
• Suzumura, K. 2000. “Presidential Address: Welfare Economics Beyond Welfarist-Consequentialism.” The Japanese Economic Review 51: 1–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5876.t01-1-00135.
   Google Scholar
• Suzumura, K. 2021. “The Capability Approach to Well-Being and Freedom from the Viewpoint of Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by E. Chiappero-Martinetti, S. Osmani, and M. Qizilbash, 106–125. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suzumura, K., and Y. Xu. 2001. “Characterizations of Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism.” Journal of Economic Theory 101: 423–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2000.2747.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, D. 2021. “Intellectual History and Defending the Capabilities Approach.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by E. Chiappero-Martinetti, S. Osmani, and M. Qizilbash, 76–91. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar