How Institutional Economics May Support the Analysis of Individual and Collective Capabilities

References

• Agarwal, Bina. 2000. “Conceptualizing Environmental Collective Action: Why Gender Matters.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 24 (3): 283–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/24.3.283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkire, Sabina. 2005. “Why the Capability Approach?” Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034275.
   Google Scholar
• Alkire, Sabina. 2008. “Using the Capability Approach: Prospective and Evaluative Analyses.” In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, edited by F. Comim, M. Quizilbash, and S. Alkire, 26–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, Antonio, Ha-Joon Chang, and Isabel Estevez. 2021. “The Missing Dimensions of the Human Capabilities Approach: Collective and Productive.” The European Journal of Development Research 33 (2): 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00356-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, Clarence. 1932. Huxley. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Biggeri, Mario, Andrea Ferrannini, and Catarina Arciprete. 2018. “Local Communities and Capability Evolution: The Core of Human Development Processes.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 19 (2): 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2017.1411896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, Tania. 2021. “The Distribution of Capabilities, Up, Down, Sideways and Along.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by Enrica Chiappero Martinetti, Sidiqqur Osmani, and Mozaffar Qizilbash, 347–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappero Martinetti, Enrica, Sidiqqur Osmani, and Mozaffar Qizilbash, eds. 2021. The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, 643–659. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, Ronald. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4 (16): 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.
   Google Scholar
• Comim, Flavio. 2008. “Social Capital and the Capability Approach.” In The Handbook of Social Capital, edited by D. Castiglione, J. van Deth, and G. Wolleb, 624–651. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John. 1924. Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John. 1931. “Institutional Economics.” American Economic Review 21 (4): 648–657.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John. 1934. Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dannenberg, Jorah. 2023. “Doing Moral Philosophy without ‘Normativity’.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2023.16.
   Google Scholar
• Darity, William. 2022. “Position and Possessions: Stratification Economics and Intergroup Inequality.” Journal of Economic Literature 60 (2): 400–426. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20211690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, John B., and Wilfred Dolfsma, eds. 2015. The Elgar Handbook to Social Economics. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Baomin. 2023. “Capitalism and Confucianism: Was Weber Right?” Journal of Economic Issues 57 (1): 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2154539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drydyk, Jay. 2021. “Capabilities, Public Reason and Democratic Deliberation.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by Enrica Chiappero Martinetti, Sidiqqur Osmani, and Mozaffar Qizilbash, 660–676. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, Amitai. 1990. The Moral Dimension. Toward a New Economics. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Peter. 2002. “Collective Capabilities, Culture, and Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom.” Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (2): 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, Philippa. 1972. “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.” The Philosophical Review 81: 305–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper, Des, and Irene van Staveren. 2003. “Development as Freedom and as What Else?” Feminist Economics 9 (2-3): 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570032000078663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelber, Katherine. 2021. “Capabilities and the Law.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by Enrica Chiappero Martinetti, Sidiqqur Osmani, and Mozaffar Qizilbash, 643–659. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2006. A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Walton. 1919. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory.” American Economic Review Supplement 9 (1): 309–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1988. Economics and Institutions – A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2000. “From Micro to Macro: The Concept of Emergence and the Role of Institutions.” In Institutions and the Role of the State, edited by Leonardo Burlamaqui, Ana Castro, and Ha-Joon Chang, 103–126. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2003. “How Veblenian Evolutionary Thinking Transcends Methodological Individualism and Methodological Collectivism.” Économie et Institutions 3: 5–28. https://doi.org/10.4000/ei.5782.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2006. “What are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues 40 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2012. “Thorstein Veblen: The Father of Evolutionary and Institutional Economics.” In Thorstein Veblen: Economics for an Age of Crises, Anthem Other Canon Economics, edited by E. S. Reinert and F. Viano, 283–296. London: Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9780857289223.012.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, Solana. 2006. “From Individual to Collective Capabilities – The Capability Approach as a Conceptual Framework for Self-Help.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 7 (3): 397–416.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, Solana. 2017. “How to Build Collective Capabilities: The 3C-Model for Grassroots-led Development.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 18 (2): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1270918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ILO. 2011. “Domestic Workers Convention no. 189.” https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C189.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. 2022. “Resolution and Conclusions Concerning Decent Work and the Social and Solidarity Economy.” https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/cooperatives/sse/WCMS_849066/lang–en/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, Naila. 1999. “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment.” Development and Change 30: 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeer, Naila. 2021. “Three Faces of Agency in Feminist Economics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics, edited by Günseli Berik, and Ebru Kongar, 99–107. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kan, Sophia, and Stephan Klasen. 2021. “Macroeconomics and Gender: The Linkages Between Economic Growth and Women’s Economic Empowerment.” In Women’s Economic Empowerment: Insights from Africa and South Asia, edited by K. Grantham, G. Dowie, and A. Haan, 75–101. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Wesley, Reggy Hooghiemstra, and Mary Feeney. 2018. “Formal Institutions, Informal Institutions, and Red Tape: A Comparative Study.” Public Administration 96: 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt, Andreas, and John List. 2015. “Do Women Avoid Salary Negotiations? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment.” Management Science 61 (9): 2016–2024. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessman, Ortrud. 2022. “Collectivity and the Capability Approach: Survey and Discussion.” Review of Social Economy 80 (4): 461–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2020.1774636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migheli, Matteo. 2011. “Capabilities and Functionings: The Role of Social Capital for Accessing New Capabilities.” Review of Political Economy 23 (1): 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2011.526297.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Jamie, and Wendy Olsen. 2011. “Conceptual Issues in Institutional Economics: Clarifying the Fluidity of Rules.” Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (3): 425–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137410000299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphey, Michael. 2014. “Self-Determination as a Collective Capability: The Case of Indigenous Peoples.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 15 (4): 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.878320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambiar, S. 2021. “Capabilities and Communities: A Perspective from Institutional Economics.” The European Journal of Development Research 33 (6): 1973–1996. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00341-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 1998. “Aristotle, Feminism, and Needs for Functioning.” In Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle, edited by Cynthia Freeland, 248–259. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons – The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association 1997.” American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2000. “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2004. “The Ten Most Important Books.” Tidsskrifted Politik 4 (7): 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Karl. (1944) 2001. The Great Transformation – the Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, Sanjay, and Adel Daoud. 2021. “Entitlements and Capabilities.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by Enrica Chiappero Martinetti, Sidiqqur Osmani, and Mozaffar Qizilbash, 677–685. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey.” Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, Ingrid. 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice. The Capability Approach Re-examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcolm. 2001. “Institutional Economics: Then and Now.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (3): 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.3.173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, Warren. 1977. “The Knight-Ayres Correspondence: The Grounds of Knowledge and Social Action.” Journal of Economic Issues 11 (3): 485–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1977.11503459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, David, and David Carruthers. 2010. “Indigenous Struggles, Environmental Justice, and Community Capabilities.” Global Environmental Politics 10 (4): 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, John. 2005. “What is an Institution?” Journal of Institutional Economics 1 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137405000020.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1973. “Behaviour and the Concept of Preference.” Economica 40 (159): 241–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2552796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4): 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1984. Resources, Values and Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1985. “Goals, Commitment, and Identity.” Journal of Law, Economic and Organization 1 (2): 341–355.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1990. “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts.” In Persistent Inequalities, edited by Irene Tinker, 123–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1996. “On the Status of Equality.” Political Theory 24 (3): 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591796024003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 2005. “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey.” Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266.
   Google Scholar
• Seyoum, Belay. 2011. “Informal Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment.” Journal of Economic Issues 45 (4): 917–940. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624450409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert. 1983. Reason in Human Affairs. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. (1759) 1984. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, Martha. 2008. “Lifestyle Conformity and Lifecycle Saving: A Veblenian Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33: 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, Francis. 2005. “Groups and Capabilities.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 6 (2): 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Francis. 2013. “Capabilities and Human Development: Beyond the Individual – the Critical Role of Social Institutions and Social Competencies.” In Human Progress and the Rising South, edited by Khalid Malik, and Maurice Kugler, 79–112. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, Rosemary, Frances Stewart, and Amryk Heyer. 2005. “When and How Far is Group Formation a Route Out of Chronic Poverty?” World Development 33 (6): 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomass, Mark. 2012. “Religious Identity, Informal Institutions, and the Nation-States of the Near East.” Journal of Economic Issues 46 (3): 705–728. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Staveren, Irene. 2001. The Values of Economics – an Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Staveren, Irene. 2020a. “Post-Covid Economy Beyond Capitalism.” Green European Journal October 2020: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Van Staveren, Irene. 2020b. “The Meso Level in Economics.” In History, Methodology and Identity for a 21st Century Social Economics, edited by Wilfred Dolfsma, Wade Hands, and Robert McMaster, 124–136. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Staveren, Irene, and Sunbo Odebode. 2007. “Gender Norms as Asymmetric Institutions: A Case Study of Yoruba Women in Nigeria.” Journal of Economic Issues 41 (4): 903–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2007.11507080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. (1899) 1934. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. 1919. The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation and Other Essays. New York: Huebsch.
   Google Scholar
• Vicari, Sara. 2014. “The Cooperative as Institution for Human Development: The Case Study of Coppalj, a Primary Cooperative in Brazil.” Journal of International Development 26: 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Jacobi, N. 2018. “Institutions as Meso Factors of Development: A Human Development Perspective.” Journal of Contextual Economics 138 (1): 53–88. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.138.1.53.
   Google Scholar
• Warnecke, Tonia. 2013. “Entrepreneurship and Gender: An Institutional Perspective.” Journal of Economic Issues 47 (2): 455–464. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624470219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrenn, Mary. 2021. “Myth Busting and Institutional Economics: Mythopoetics.” In Institutional Economics: Perspectives and Methods in Pursuit of a Better World, edited by Charles Whalen, 225–246. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar