The power of reason in international negotiations: notes on Risse, Müller, and Deitelhoff

References

• Brown, M.B., 2006. Survey article: citizen panels and the concept of representation. The journal of political philosophy, 14 (2), 203–225.
   Google Scholar
• Buchstein, H., 2009. Jürgen Habermas and critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 3 (3–4), 421–425.
   Google Scholar
• Buchstein, H. and Jörke, D., 2012. The argumentative turn towards deliberative democracy: Habermas’ contribution to and the Foucauldian critique. In: F. Fischer and H. Gottweis, eds. Discourse and deliberation in public policy: the argumentative turn revisited. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 271–304.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., 2006. Überzeugung in der Politik: Grundzüge einer Diskurstheorie internationalen Regierens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., 2009. The discursive process of legalization: charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case. International organization, 63 (1), 33–65.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N. and Müller, H., 2005. Theoretical paradise – empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas. Review of international studies, 31 (1), 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T. and Steans, J., 2005. A useful dialog? Habermas and international relations. Review of international studies, 31 (1), 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1986. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory. In: J. Elster and A. Hylland, eds. Foundations of social choice theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–132.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1991. Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies. The Storrs Lectures, Yale Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1995. Strategic uses of argument. In: K.J. Arrow et al., eds. Barriers to conflict resolution. New York and London: W.W. Norton, 237–257.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982. The subject and power. Critical inquiry, 8 (4), 777–795.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1984. Theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Transl. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrieder, T., 2008. Moralische Argumente in den internationalen Beziehungen: Grenzen einer verständigungstheoretischen ‘Erklärung’ moralischer Debatten. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 15 (2), 161–186.
   Google Scholar
• Herborth, B., 2007. Verständigung verstehen: Anmerkungen zur ZIB-Debatte. In: P. Niesen and B. Herborth, eds. Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 147–172.
   Google Scholar
• Jörke, D., 2009. The epistemic turn of critical theory: implications for deliberative politics and policy-making. Critical policy studies, 3 (3–4), 440–446.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, O., 1995. Rationales kommunikatives Handeln in den internationalen Beziehungen: Ist eine Verbindung von Rational-Choice-Theorie und Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns möglich? Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 2 (1), 5–48.
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A., 1998. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the post-Westphalian era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. and Olsen, J., 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International organization, 52 (4), 943–969.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J., 2005. Reading Habermas in anarchy: multilateral diplomacy and global public spheres. American political science review, 99 (3), 401–417.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., 1994. Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln, Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorien. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1 (1), 15–44.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., 2004. Arguing, bargaining and all that: communicative action, rationalist theory and the logic of appropriateness in international relations. European journal of international relations, 10 (3), 395–435.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, N., 1989. World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., 2000. Let’s argue: communicative action in world politics. International organization, 54 (1), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., 2003. Konstruktivismus, Rationalismus und Theorien Internationaler Beziehungen – warum empirisch nichts so heiß gegessen wird, wie es theoretisch gekocht wurde. In: G. Hellmann, K.D. Wolf and M. Zürn, eds. Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen, Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 99–132.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., 2004. Global governance and communicative action. Government and opposition, 39 (2), 288–319.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. and Sikkink, K., 1999. The socialization of international human rights norms in domestic practices: introduction. In: T. Risse, S.C. Ropp and K. Sikkink, eds. The power of human rights: international norms and domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., Jetschke, A., and Schmitz, H.P., 2002. Die Macht der Menschenrechte, Internationale Normen, kommunikatives Handeln und politischer Wandel in den Ländern des Südens. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Risse-Kappen, T., 1995. Reden ist nicht billig, Zur Debatte um Kommunikation und Rationalität. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 2 (2), 171–184.
   Google Scholar
• Saretzki, T., 2007. Argumentieren, Verhandeln und Strategie: Theoretische Referenzen, begriffliche Unterscheidungen und empirische Studien zu arguing und bargaining in der internationalen Politik. In: P. Niesen and B. Herborth, eds. Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 111–146.
   Google Scholar
• Saretzki, T., 2009. From bargaining to arguing, from strategic to communicative action? Theoretical distinctions and methodological problems in empirical studies of deliberative policy processes. Critical policy studies, 3 (2), 153–183.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., 1997. Rhetorisches Handeln in der internationalen Politik. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 4 (2), 219–254.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, G., 1994. Rational Choice und kommunikatives Handeln: Eine Replik auf Harald Müller. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1 (2), 357–366.
   Google Scholar
• Steinke, R., 2012. The politics of international criminal law. Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., 1967. Neutrality in political science. In: P. Laslett and W.G. Runicman, eds. Philosophy, politics and society. Third series. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., 1971. Interpretation and the sciences of man. The review of metaphysics, 25 (1), 3–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbert, C. and Risse, T., 2005. Deliberately changing the discourse: what does make arguing effective? Acta politica, 40 (3), 351–367.
   Google Scholar
• Zangl, B. and Zürn, M., 1996. Argumentatives Handeln bei internationalen Verhandlungen, Moderate Anmerkungen zur post-realistischen Debatte. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 3 (1), 341–366.
   Google Scholar