Let’s not argue over EU policies: the case of wine reform

References

• Boussaguet, L. and Dehousse, R., 2008. The role of lay people in scientific governance: the experience of the first ‘citizen conferences’ at the EU level. In: E. Vos, ed. European risk governance: its science, its inclusiveness and its effectiveness. Mannheim: Connex Report Series, 153–183.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., ed., 1989. La Science et ses réseaux: Genèse et circulation des faits scientifiques. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Campana, A., Henry, E. and Rowell, J., eds, 2006. La construction des problèmes publics en Europe. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Clavel, J., 2008. Mondialisation des vins: Vins INOQ ou vin OMC? Bordeaux: Féret.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O., 2013. Deliberation within the European Parliament: between a democratic practice and a method of decision-making. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, V. and Dulong, D., eds, 1999. La question technocratique: de l’invention d’une figure aux transformations de l’action publique. Strasbourg: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. and Neyer, J., 2003. Introduction: the forging of deliberative supranationalism in the EU?. In: E. Eriksen, C. Joerges, and J. Neyer, eds. European governance, deliberation and the quest for democratization. Oslo: ARENA Report 02/2003, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E., Fossum, J-E. and Menéndez A.J., eds, 2004. Developing a constitution for Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feredj, R., 2007. O.P.A sur la viticulture: Entre fatalité et espoir. Bordeaux: Féret.
   Google Scholar
• Fouilleux, E., de Maillard, J., and Smith, A., 2005. Technical or political: the working groups of the council of ministers. Journal of European public policy, 12 (4), 609–623.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T. 2003. Communicative rationality in European governance?. In: E. Eriksen, C. Joerges, and J. Neyer, eds. European governance, deliberation and the quest for democratization. Oslo: ARENA Report 02/2003, 57–140.
   Google Scholar
• Georgakakis, D., ed., 2008. La nouvelle gouvernance européenne: les usages politiques d’un concept. Strasbourg: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Hauray, B., 2006. L’Europe du médicament: Politique, expertise, intérêts privés. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 1990. The fifth branch: science advisers as policy makers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, B. and Smith, A., eds, 2008. Industries and globalization: the political causality of difference. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, B. and Smith, A., 2011. Conceptualizing the role of politics in the economy: industries and their institutionalizations. Review of international political economy, 18 (3), 358–383.
   Google Scholar
• Lagroye, J., 2003. Les processus de politisation. In: J. Lagroye, ed., La politisation. Paris: Belin, 359–372.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., 1998. Is the ‘hard bargaining’ image of the council misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive. Journal of common market studies, 36 (4), 479–504.
   Google Scholar
• Magnette, P., 2004. La Convention européenne: Argumenter et négocier dans une assemblée constituante transnationale. Revue française de science politique, 54 (1), 5–43
   Google Scholar
• Maillard, de J., 2001. La Commission, le vin et la réforme. Politique européenne, 5, 70–86.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, H., 2007. La ‘démocratie participative’ selon la Commission européenne: une chance pour les groupes d’intérêt ? Le Livre blanc sur la gouvernance européenne à l’épreuve. In: C. Neveu, ed. Cultures et pratiques participatives: perspectives comparatives. Paris: L’Harmattan, 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, H., 2008. Les groupes d’intérêts et la consultation sur le livre blanc: objectivation et institutionnalisation de la ‘société civile’. In: D. Georgakakis, ed., La nouvelle gouvernance européenne: les usages politiques d’un concept. Strasbourg@ Presses universitaires de Strasbourg, 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, P., 1995. Les politiques publiques comme construction d’un rapport au monde. In: A. Faure, G. Pollet and Ph. Warin, eds. La construction du sens dans les politiques publiques. Paris: L’Harmattan, 153–179.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., 2010. Conceptualizing and mapping the deliberative society. Paper presented at the Congress of the Political Science Association, Edinburgh, April.
   Google Scholar
• Passeron, J-C. and Revel, J., 2005. Penser par cas: Enquête. Paris, Editions de l’EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. and Shaffer, G., 2008a. Risk regulation, GMOs and the limits of deliberation. In: H. Wallace and D. Naurin, eds. Unveiling the Council of the European Union: games governments play in Brussels. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 144–164.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. and Shaffer, G., 2008b. When co-operation fails: the international law and politics of genetically modified foods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C., 1999. Technocracy in the European Union. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C., 2007. Whither better regulation for the Lisbon Agenda. Journal of European public policy, 14 (2), 190–207.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. and Meuwese A., 2010. Hard questions, hard solutions: proceduralisation through impact assessment in the EU. West European politics, 33 (1), 136–153.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., 2000. ‘Let’s argue !’ Communicative action in world politics. International organization, 54 (1), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rochefort, D. and Cobb, R., 1994. The politics of problem definition. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, A., 2010. Constructions savantes et légitimation des politiques européennes: La circulation des savoirs sur la vigne et le vin. Revue française de science politique, 60 (6), 1091–1113.
   Google Scholar
• Saliou, V., 2013. La parole profane dans le processus de consultation sur la politique maritime de l’Union européenne : un outil de gouvernement. Gouvernement et action publique, 5, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Saverol, D. and Simmel, B., 2008. In vino satanas! Paris: Albin Michel.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., 2009. How the WTO matters to industry: the case of Scotch whisky. International political sociology, 3 (2), 176–193.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., 2010. Le gouvernement de l’Union européenne: une sociologie politique. 2nd ed. Paris: LGDJ.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., de Maillard, J., and Costa, O., 2007. Vin et politique: Bordeaux, la France et la mondialisation. Paris: Presses de Science Po.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A., 1979. Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar