Arguing about arguing: a comment

References

• Bächtiger, A. and Steiner, J., eds, 2005. Empirical approaches to deliberative democracy. Special Issue of ‘Acta Politica’, 40: 2–3. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. and Duvall, R., eds, 2005. Power in global governance. Cambridge University Press. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.759686.
   Google Scholar
• Berthet, T., 2013. Any room for deliberation? Educational guidance in French schools. Critical policy studies, 7 (3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.759686.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J.T., 2001. Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International organization, 55 (3), 553–588.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., 2006. Überzeugung in der Politik. Grundzüge einer Diskurstheorie internationalen Regierens. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., 2007. Was vom Tage übrig blieb. Inseln der Überzeugung im vermachteten Alltagsgeschäft internationalen Regierens. In: P. Niesen and B. Herborth, eds. Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 26–56.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., 2009. The discursive process of legalization: charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case. International organization, 63 (1), 33–65.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N. and Müller, H., 2005. Theoretical paradise – empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas. Review of international studies, 31 (1), 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J., 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1986. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory. In: J. Elster and A. Hylland, eds. Foundations of social choice cheory. Cambridge University Press, 103–132.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1991. Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies. New Haven, CT: Yale Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1992. Arguing and bargaining in the federal convention and the assemblée Constituante. In: R. Malnes and A. Underdal, eds. Rationality and institutions. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E.O. and Fossum, J., 2000. Democracy in the European Union: integration through deliberation? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E.O. and Weigard, J., 1997. Conceptualizing politics: strategic or communicative action? Scandinavian political studies, 20 (3), 219–241.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1991. Politics and the study of discourse. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller, eds. The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Grobe, C., 2010. The power of words. Argumentative persuasion in international negotiations. European journal of international relations, 16 (1), 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P.M., 1992. Banning chlorofluorocarbons: epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone. International organization, 46 (1), 187–224.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1995. Replik auf Einwände. In: J. Habermas, ed. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 475–570.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 2007. Kommunikative Rationalität und grenzüberschreitende Politik: Eine Replik. In: P. Niesen and B. Herborth, eds. Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurtam Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 406–459.
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., 2001a. Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 8 (2), 243–286.
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., 2001b. Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch Argumentieren? Eine empirische Analyse auf der Basis der Sprechakttheorie. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 42 (3), 414–446.
   Google Scholar
• Holzscheiter, A., 2010. Children’s rights in international politics: the transformative power of discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Itçaina, X., 2013. Between logics of deliberation and appropriateness: the discourse and practices of the Catholic Church over the Basque issue. Critical policy studies, 7 (3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.752971.
   Google Scholar
• Joerges, C. and Neyer, J., 1997a. From intergovernmental bargaining to deliberative political processes: the constitutionalisation of comitology. European law journal, 3 (3), 273–299.
   Google Scholar
• Joerges, C. and Neyer, J., 1997b. Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuffs sector. Journal of European public policy, 4, 609–625.
   Google Scholar
• Jörke, D., 2013. The power of reason in international negotiations: notes on Risse, Müller, and Deitelhoff. Critical policy studies, 7 (3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.739784.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P.J., ed., 1996. The culture of national security. Norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., 1989. International institutions: two approaches. In: R.O. Keohane, ed. International institutions and state power. Boulder, CO: Westview, 158–179.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., 2000. The method of community in EU decision-making and administrative rivalry in the Council’s infrastructure. Journal of European public policy, 7 (2), 261–289.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P., 1989. Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basics of politics. London: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P., 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International organization, 52 (4), 943–969.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H.J., 1948. Politics among nations. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., 1994. Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln. Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorien. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1 (1), 15–44.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., 2001. International Relations as communicative action. In: K. Fierke and K.E. Jorgensen, eds, Constructing international relations. The next generation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., 2002. Appendix to ‘Arguing, Bargaining and All That’ – some preliminary findings from studying the 1995 and 2000 NPT Review Conferences. Unpublished manuscript. Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., 2004. Arguing, bargaining, and all that: communicative action, rationalist theory and the logic of appropriateness in international relations. European journal of international relations, 10 (3), 395–435.
   Google Scholar
• Neyer, J., 2006. The deliberative turn in integration theory. Journal of European public policy, 13 (5), 779–791.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, A. and Compagnon, D., 2013. From logics to procedures: arguing within international environmental negotiations. Critical policy studies, 7 (3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.752970.
   Google Scholar
• Price, R.M., 1998. Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. International organization, 52 (3), 613–644.
   Google Scholar
• Quantin, P. and Smith, A., 2013. Risse’s deliberative logic and governance: a critical engagement. Critical policy studies, 7 (3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.759685.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., 1999. International norms and domestic change: arguing and communicative behavior in the human rights area. Politics & society, 27 (4), 526–556.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., 2000. ‘Let’s Argue!’ Communicative action in international relations. International organization, 54 (1), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. and Kleine, M., 2010. Deliberation in negotiations. Journal of European public policy, 17 (5), 708–726.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., Ropp, S.C. and Sikkink, K., eds, 1999. The power of human rights: international norms and domestic change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., Ropp, S.C. and Sikkink, K., eds, 2013. From commitment to compliance. The persistent power of human rights. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., 1997. Rhetorisches Handeln in der internationalen Politik. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 4 (2), 219–254.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., 2001. Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the enlargement of the EU. International organization, 55 (1), 47–80.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, G., 1994. Rational Choice und kommunikatives Handeln. Eine Replik auf Harald Müller. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1 (2), 357–366.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., 2013. Let’s not argue over EU policies: the case of wine reform. Critical policy studies,7 (3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.752973.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. et al., 2004. Deliberative politics in action: analyzing parliamentary discourses. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbert, C., 1997. Die Konstruktion von Umwelt. Der Einfluss von Ideen, Institutionen und Kultur auf (inter-)nationale Klimapolitik in den USA und der Bundesrepublik. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbert, C. and Risse, T., 2005. Deliberately changing the discourse: what does make arguing effective? Acta politica, 40, 351–367.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbert, C., Risse, T. and Müller, H., 2004. Arguing and persuasion in multilateral negotiations. Unpublished manuscript. Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K., 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A., 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 88 (2), 384–396.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., 1991. Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society. International organization, 45 (3), 281–308.
   Google Scholar