Think tank networks and the knowledge–interest nexus: the case of climate change

References

• Anderegg, W.R.L., et al., 2010. Expert credibility and climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/27/12107.long [Accessed 31 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Asher, T. and Guilhot, N., 2010. The collapsing space between universities and think-tanks. Paris:UNESCO, 338–344, World Social Science Report, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, W., 2013. Big Australian media reject climate science [online]. The Conversation, November 1, Available from: http://theconversation.com/big-australian-media-reject-climate-science-19727 [Accessed 15 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Bonds, E., 2011. The knowledge-shaping process: elite mobilization and environmental policy. Critical sociology, 37 (4), 429–446.
   Google Scholar
• Braml, J., 2004. Think tanks versus ‘Denkfabriken’? Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R.J., 2013. Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climate Change, November 13. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1018.
   Google Scholar
• Bührmann, A.D. and Schneider, W., 2008. Vom Diskurs zum Dispositiv. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cockett, R., 1995. Thinking the unthinkable: think-tanks and the economic counter-revolution, 1931–83. London: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., et al., 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental research letters, 8, 024024. doi:10.1088/1748–9326/8/2/024024.
   Google Scholar
• Corporate Europe Observatory, 2010. Concealing their sources – who funds Europe’s climate change deniers? Brussels. Available from: http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/files/article/funding_climate_deniers.pdf [Accessed 30 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, C., 2013. Large companies prepared to pay price on carbon. New York Times, 12 December, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R., 1993. Free market environmentalism: friend or foe? Environmental politics, 2 (1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, S., et al., 2006. Einführung: Politikberatung – Themen, Fragestellungen, Begriffsdimensionen, Konzepte, Akteure, Institutionen, und Politikfelder. In: S. Falk., et al., eds. Handbuch Politikberatung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, L., 2013. The right leans [online]. The Nation, 15 Apr, Available from: http://www.thenation.com/article/173528/right-leans# [Accessed 16 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 1993. Policy discourse and the politics of Washington think tanks. In: F. Fischer and J. Forrester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press, 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. and Plehwe, D., 2013. The ‘Pink Tide’ and neoliberal civil society formation. Think tank networks in Latin America. State of nature – an online journal of radical ideas [online]. Available from: http://www.stateofnature.org/?p=6601 [Accessed 20 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, L., 1980. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Frankfurt/Main: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, (Reprint Original 1935).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., et al., 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guide, 2013. Guide for responsible corporate engagement in climate policy, 2013. UN Global Compact [online]. Available from: http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Environment/climate/Guide_Responsible_Corporate_Engagement_Climate_Policy.pdf [Accessed 22 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., 1993. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britain. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 43–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., 2013. A media storm in the world risk society: enacting scientific authority in the IPCC controversy (2009–10). Critical policy studies, 6 (4), 452–464.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. and Baden, J., eds, 1977. Managing the commons. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A.O., 2001. Crossing boundaries: selected writings. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jaques, P.J., Dunlap, R.E., and Freeman, M., 2008. The organisation of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental politics, 17 (3), 349–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, N., 2011. Capitalism vs. the climate. The Nation. Available from: http://www.thenation.com/article/164497/capitalism-vs-climate# [Accessed 28 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S., 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lal, D., 1997. Ecological imperialism. In: J. Morris, ed. Climate change – challenging the conventional wisdom [online]. London: Institute of Economic Affairs (EA Environment Unit) Available from: http://www.policynetwork.net/uploaded/pdf/climate_change_book.pdf [Accessed 30 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Lal, D., 1998. Unintended consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, B.M.A., 2006. Think tanks in Deutschland [online]. Konstanz. Available from: http://www.thinktankdirectory.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/lang_2006_think-tanks-in-deutschland.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• McGann, J.G., 2012. The global go to think tanks and policy advice [online]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Available from: http://gotothinktank.com/dev1/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/2012_Global_Go_To_Think_Tank_Report_-_FINAL-1.28.13.pdf [Accessed 28 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• McGann, J.G. and Weaver, R.K., eds, 2005. Think tanks & civil society. Catalysts for ideas and action. New Brunswick: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Medvetz, T., 2012. Think tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. and Dinan, W., 2014. (forthcoming) Organised contrarianism: think tanks and the communication of climate scepticism. In: A. Hansen and R. Cox, eds. Handbook of environment and communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., 2011. Science-mart: privatizing American science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neubacher, A., 2012. Deiche statt Windräder. Der Spiegel (49/2012).
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M., 2010. Merchants of doubt. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Pestre, D., 2003. Regimes of knowledge production in society: towards a more political and social reading. Minerva, 41, 245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D., 2010. Who cares about excellence? Commercialization, competition, and the transnational promotion of neoliberal expertise. In: T. Halvorsen and A. Nyhagen, eds. Academic identities – academic challenges? American and European experiences of the transformation of higher education and research. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 159–193.
   Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D., 2011. Transnational discourse coalitions and monetary policy: Argentina and the limited powers of the ‘Washington Consensus’. Critical policy studies, 5 (02), 127–148.
   Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D., 2012. Attack and roll back. The constructive and destructive potential of think tank networks. Global responsibility – newsletter of the international network of engineers and scientists for global responsibility [online] (64), 10–12, Available from: http://www.inesglobal.com/download.php?f=b560c4aaa46f728d1db4a60126235da1 [Accessed 12 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D., 2013. Converging on strike revisited. Deregulation and the rise of low cost employment regimes in the European airline industry. Discussion Paper SP III 2013-502. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• Revkin, A., 2009. Skeptics dispute climate worries and each other. New York Times Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute#cite_note-nyt-skeptics-51 [Accessed 8 March 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Saloma, J.S., III., 1984. Ominous politics. The new conservative labyrinth. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Schlögl, M., 2010. Das global development network (GDN): Ein globales Entwicklungsnetzwerk? Eine quantitative Annäherung. Journal für entwicklungspolitik, 26 (2), 38–62.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. and Streeck, W., 1999. The organization of business interests: studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies. MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/1. Köln: MPIfG.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., 2013. Knowledge actors and transnational governance: the public-private policy nexus in the global agora. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S., 1988. States and markets. An Introduction to International Political Economy. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tanurao, D., 2013. Green capitalism. Why it can’t work. London: Merlin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Union of Concerned Scientists, 2012. A climate of corporate control. How corporations have influenced the U.S. dialogue on climate science and policy. Washington, DC: Union of Concerned Scientists.
   Google Scholar
• von Storch, H., 2009. Klimaforschung und Politikberatung – zwischen Bringeschuld und Postnormalität. Leviathan, 37, 305–317.
   Google Scholar
• Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU), 2011. Hauptgutachten. Welt imWandel. Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine große Transformation. Berlin: WBGU.
   Google Scholar