One world or two? Science–policy interactions in the climate field

References

• Agrawala, S., and M. Van Aalst. 2005. “Bridging the Gap between Climate Change and Development.” In Bridge over Troubled Waters: Linking Climate Change and Development, edited by S. Agrawala. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S. 2011. “Moving beyond the Linear Model of Expertise? IPCC and the Test of Adaptation.” Regional Environmental Change 11 (2): 297–306. doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0136-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. 2012b. “Between Tribalism and Trust: The IPCC under the ‘Public Microscope’.” Nature and Culture 7 (2): 151–173. doi:10.3167/nc.2012.070203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. 2012a. “From Truth to Trust: Lessons Learned from ‘Climategate’.” In Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness, edited by K. Hogl, E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck, and M. Pregernig, 220–241. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bolin, B. 2007. A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, G. A., and J. G. Borchers. 2000. “Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-Policy Gap.” Conservation Ecology 4 (1): 7. doi:10.5751/ES-00174-040107.
   Google Scholar
• Brysse, K., N. Oreskes, J. O’Reilly, and M. Oppenheimer. 2013. “Climate Change Prediction: Erring on the Side of Least Drama?.” Global Environmental Change 23 (1): 327–337. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budescu, D. V., S. Broomwell, and H. Por. 2009. “Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Psychological Science 20 (3): 299–308. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02284.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R. B. Mitchell. 2003. “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (14): 8086–8091. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231332100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, S., et al. 2013. “Opening up Knowledge Systems for Better Responses to Global Environmental Change”. Environmental Science & Policy 28: 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, A., and C. Groves. 2014. “Breaking the Climate Change Communication Deadlock.” Nature Climate Change 4 (9): 743–745. doi:10.1038/nclimate2348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilling, L., and M. C. Lemos. 2011. “Creating Usable Science: Opportunities and Constraints for Climate Knowledge Use and Their Implications for Science Policy.” Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 680–689. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., and J. Minx. 2014. “Mapmakers and Navigators, Facts and Values.” Science 345 (6192): 37–38. doi:10.1126/science.1255998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenack, K., et al. 2014. “Explaining and Overcoming Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation.” Nature Climate Change 4: 867–872. doi:10.1038/nclimate2350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, S., and L. O. Næss, 2003. Pro-Poor Climate Adaptation – Norwegian Development Co-Operation and Climate Change Adaptation: An Assessment of Issues, Strategies and Potential Entry Points. CICERO Report 2003: 2. Oslo: Center for International Climate and Environmental Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fløttum, K., D. Gasper, and A. L. St.Clair. 2016. “Synthesizing A Policy-Relevant Message from the Three IPCC “Worlds” – A Comparison of Topics and Frames in the SPMs of the Fifth Assessment Report.” Global Environmental Change 38: 118–129. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1995. “Boundaries of Science.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 393–443. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 1999. “Stabilizing the Boundary between U.S. Politics and Science: The Role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a Boundary Organization.” Social Studies of Science 29 (1): 87–112. doi:10.1177/030631299029001004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M., and C. Stevens. 2011. “Organized Science, Usable Knowledge and Multilateral Environmental Governance.” In Governing the Air: The Dynamics of Science, Policy, and Citizen Interaction, edited by R. Lidskog and G. Sundqvist, 125–161. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. 2007. “Epistemic Communities.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, edited by D. Bodanski, J. Brunnée, and E. Hey, 791–806. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackmann, H., S. Moser, and A. L. St.Clair. 2014. “The Social Heart of Global Environmental Change.” Nature Climate Change 4: 653–655. doi:10.1038/nclimate2320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., et al. 2016. “Ice Melt, Sea Level Rise and Superstorms: Evidence from Paleoclimate Data, Climate Modeling, and Modern Observations that 2°C Global Warming Is Highly Dangerous”. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16: 3761–3812. doi:10.5194/acp-16-3761-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. 2000. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogwood, B. W., and L. A. Gunn. 1984. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., A. Wesselink, and R. Cairns. 2013. “Lost in the Problem: The Role of Boundary Organisations in the Governance of Climate Change.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4 (4): 283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., E. Zorita, T. F. Stocker, J. Price, J. R. Christy. 2010. “IPCC: Cherish It, Tweak It or Scrap It?”. Nature 463: 730–732. doi:10.1038/463730a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2010. “Problems with Making and Governing Global Kinds of Knowledge.” Global Environmental Change 20 (4): 558–564. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., and M. Mahony. 2010. “Climate Change: What Do We Know about the IPCC?.” Progress in Physical Geography 34 (5): 705–718. doi:10.1177/0309133310373719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InterAcademy Council (IAC). 2010. Climate Change Assessments: Review of the Processes and Procedures of the InterGovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Amsterdam: IAC.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [O.R. Edenhofer Et Al. Eds.]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2014. “From Deficit to Democracy (Re-Visited).” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 71–76. doi:10.1177/0963662513510646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2010. “A New Climate for Society.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3): 233–253. doi:10.1177/0263276409361497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2012. Science and Public Reason. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2017. “Science and Democracy.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., C. J. Kirchhoff, and V. Ramprasad. 2012. “Narrowing the Climate Information Usability Gap.” Nature Climate Change 2 (11): 789–794. doi:10.1038/nclimate1614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and G. Sundqvist. 2015. “When Does Science Matter? International Relations Meets Science and Technology Studies.” Global Environmental Politics 15 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrandrea, M. D., N. E. Heller, T. L. Root, and S. H. Schneider. 2010. “Bridging the Gap: Linking Climate-Impacts Research with Adaptation Planning and Management.” Climatic Change 100 (1): 87–101. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9827-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., and F. J. Arndt. 2009. “The Politics of Socionatures: Images of Environmental Foreign Policy.” In Environmental Change and Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice, edited by P. G. Harris, 74–89. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C. 2010. “Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1: 31–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2003. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. 2004. “Science and Public Policy: What’s Proof Got to Do with It?” Environmental Science & Policy 7 (5): 369–383. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielke Jr., R. A. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, C., and K. De Meyer. 2014. “Climate Science Reconsidered.” Nature Climate Change 4: 745–746. doi:10.1038/nclimate2352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. 2011. “Does Climate Change Knowledge Really Matter.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2 (4): 475–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D., and R. A. Pielke Jr. 2007. “The Neglected Heart of Science Policy: Reconciling Supply of and Demand for Science.” Environmental Science & Policy 10 (1): 5–16. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, N. J., and S. M. Lensink. 2007. “Communicating Uncertainty in the IPCC’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scenarios.” Climatic Change 82 (3–4): 293–308. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9194-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, G. 2012. “Climate Science Predictions Prove Too Conservative.” Scientific American, December 6: 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shackley, S., and B. Wynne. 1997. “Global Warming Potentials: Ambiguity or Precision as an Aid to Policy?” Climate Research 8 (2): 89–106. doi:10.3354/cr008089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St.Clair, A. L., and K. Aalbu. 2016. “The Four Transformative Governance Shifts Emerging from COP21.” In Will the Paris Agreement Save the World? an Analysis and Critique of the Governance Roadmap Set Out in COP 21, Oslo Academy of Global Governance Working Paper 2016.1, edited by H. Wilhite and A. Hansen, 41–46. Oslo: University of Oslo, Centre for Development and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, N., and R. Grundmann. 2012. “How Does Knowledge Relate to Political Action?” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25 (1): 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G., I. Bohlin, E. A. Hermansen, and S. Yearley. 2015. “Formalization and Separation: A Systematic Basis for Interpreting Approaches to Summarizing Science for Climate Policy.” Social Studies of Science 45 (3): 416–440. doi:10.1177/0306312715583737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol, R. S. 2011. “Regulating Knowledge Monopolies: The Case of the IPCC.” Climatic Change 108: 827–839. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0214-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadrot, A. B. 2014. The Politics of Knowledge and Global Diversity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoek, R. E., M. Brugnach, J. P. Mulder, and A. Y. Hoekstra. 2014. “Analysing the Cascades of Uncertainty in Flood Defence Projects: How “Not Knowing Enough” Is Related to “Knowing Differently”.” Global Environmental Change 24: 373–388. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Sluijs, J. P., R. van Est, and M. Riphagen. 2010. “Beyond Consensus: Reflections from a Democratic Perspective on the Interaction between Climate Politics and Science.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2 (5–6): 409–415. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weart, S. R. 2008. The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U. 2010. “What Shapes Perceptions of Climate Change?” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (3): 332–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1993. “Public Uptake of Science: A Case for Institutional Reflexivity.” Public Understanding of Science 2 (4): 321–337. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/2/4/003.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2010. “Strange Weather, Again: Climate Science as Political Art.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3): 289–305. doi:10.1177/0263276410361499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamin, F., and J. Depledge. 2004. The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yearley, S. 2009. “Sociology and Climate Change after Kyoto: What Roles for Social Science in Understanding Climate Change?” Current Sociology 57 (3): 389–405. doi:10.1177/0011392108101589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar