Bringing back Max Weber into Network Governance Research

References

• Akkerman, T. 2001. “Urban Debates and Deliberative Democracy.” Acta Politica 36: 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V., and E. R. Engelen. 2003. “Taking Pluralism Seriously. Arguing for an Institutional Turn in Political Philosophy.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 29 (4): 364–406. doi:10.1177/0191453703294002.
   Google Scholar
• Bogason, P., and J. A. Musso. 2006. “The Democratic Prospects of Network Governance.” The American Review of Public Administration 36 (2): 3–18. doi:10.1177/0275074005282581.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and D. Panke. 2007. “Network Governance: Effective and Legitimate?.” In Theories of Democratic Governance, edited by E. Sørensen and J. Torfing. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan: 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. 1993. “Beyond Good and Evil: The Ethical Sensibility of Michel Foucault.” Political Theory 21 (3): 365–389. doi:10.1177/0090591793021003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. 1999. “Civil Society at the Turn of the Millenium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order.” Review of International Studies 25: 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. 2011. Challenging Governance Theory. From Networks to Hegemony. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2007. “Networks and Democratic Ideals: Equality, Freedom, and Communication.” In Theories of Democratic Governance, edited by E. Sørensen and J. Torfing. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan: 262–273.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., J. Justice, and C. Skelcher. 2015. “Governing at Arm’s Length: Eroding or Enhancing Democracy?” Policy & Politics 43 (1): 137–153. doi:10.1332/030557314X14029325020059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M. 2014. “The Concept of Governance in the Spirit of Capitalism.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1080/19460171.2014.883854.
   Google Scholar
• Erkkillä, T. 2007. “Governance and Accountability – A Shift in Conceptualization.” Public Administration Quarterly 31 (1/2): 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Esmark, A. 2007. “Democratic Accountability and Network Governance – Problems and Potentials.” In Theories of Democratic Governance, edited by E. Sørensen and J. Torfing. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan: 274–296.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2003. “Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void.” Policy Sciences 36: 175–195. doi:10.1023/A:1024834510939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2009. Authoritative Governance. Policy-Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. 2009. “Deliberative Governance in the Context of Power.” Policy and Society 28: 173–184. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. 1992. Essays. Moral, Political, and Literary. Aalen: Scientia Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1998. “The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 29–45. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00107.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2016. The State: Past, Present, Future. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. 2007. “Post-Hegemony? I Don’t Think So.” Theory, Culture & Society 24 (3): 95–110. doi:10.1177/0263276407075958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten, P. H., M. J. J. Eekhout, R. P. Kranendonk, K. R. de Poel, and J. J. N. Geenen. 2001. Op zoek naar Magische Momenten in de ruimtelijke planvorming. Wageningen: Research Instituut voor de Groene Ruimte.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, A. M. 2011. “Rhodes’ Contribution to Governance Theory: Praise, Criticism and the Future Governance Debate.” Public Administration 89 (1): 101–113. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. 2008. “Governance and Governance Networks in Europe. An Assessment of Ten Years of Research on the Theme.” Public Management Review 10 (4): 505–525. doi:10.1080/14719030802263954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and C. Skelcher. 2007. “Democracy and Governance Networks: Compatible or Not?” Public Administration 85 (3): 587–608. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. Koppenjan. 2016. Governance Networks in the Public Sector. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., and E. H. Klijn. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks. A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O. 2013. “Sovereign Power beyond the State: A Critical Reappraisal of Governance by Networks.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (2): 99–114. doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.784624.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D., and J. Forester. 2010. “Learning in Practice: Public Policy Mediation.” Critical Policy Analysis 1 (4): 342–370.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1975. Macht. Stuttgart: Enke Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1985. A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” The American Political Science Review 78 (3): 734–749. doi:10.2307/1961840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez, X. 2016. “The Irrelevance of Legitimacy.” Political Studies 61 (1): 19–34. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12202.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2011. “The New Orthodoxy: The Differentiated Polity Model.” Public Administration 89 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 2004. The German Ideology. New York: International Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Netelenbos, B. (2016). Political Legitimacy beyond Weber. An analytical framework. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. 2014. “Governing the Present: Activism, Neoliberalism, and the Problem of Power and Consent.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (2): 133–147. doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.818397.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 2009. “Governance: An ‘Empty Signifier’?” Constellations 16 (4): 550–562. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00570.x.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. 2015. “Democratic Order, Autonomy, and Accountability.” Governance 28 (4): 425–440. doi:10.1111/gove.2015.28.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance Of Complex Economic Systems.” American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2013. Democracy in Crisis? Politics, Governance and Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2005. Governing Complex Societies. Trajectories and Scenarios. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2003. The Essential Public Manager. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy. Network Forms of Organisation.” Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and P. Kenis. 2007. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years On.” Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., H. Sullivan, and S. Jeffares. 2013. Hybrid Governance in European Cities. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2002. “Democratic Theory and Network Governance.” Administrative Theory & Practice 24 (4): 693–720. doi:10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2005. “The Democratic Problems and Potentials of Network Governance.” European Political Science 4: 348–357. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210033.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2007. Theories of Democratic Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2009. “Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic through Metagovernance.” Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2012. Policy Paradox. The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd ed. New York: Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2005. “Governance Network Theory: Towards a Second Generation.” European Political Science 4: 305–314. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210031.
   Google Scholar
• Triantafillou, P. 2012. New Forms of Governing. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57: 375–400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stokkum, B. 2006. Rituelen van Beraadslaging. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2002. “In the Shadow of Hierarchy: Deliberative Democracy and Public Administration.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 24 (1): 231–250. doi:10.1080/10841806.2002.11029342.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. 1996. “Deliberative Democracy and Authority.” American Political Science Review 90 (1): 46–60. doi:10.2307/2082797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. 2009. “Governance-Driven Democratization.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1080/19460170903158040.
   Google Scholar
• Weale, A. 2011. “New Modes of Governance, Political Accountability and Public Reason.” Government and Opposition 46 (1): 58–80. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01330.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1958a. “Politics as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills. New York: Oxford University Press: 77–128.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1958b. “Science as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills. New York: Oxford University Press: 129–156.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 2011. “‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy.” In The Methodology of the Social Sciences. edited by E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers: 49–112.
   Google Scholar