Going beyond science-policy interaction? An analysis of views among intergovernmental panel on climate change actors

References

• Beck, S. 2011. “Moving beyond the Linear Model of Expertise? IPCC and the Test of Adaptation.” Regional Environmental Change 11 (2): 297–306. doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0136-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., M. Borie, J. Chilvers, A. Esguerra, K. Heubach, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, et al. 2014. “Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise: The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.” GAIA 23 (2): 80–87. DOI:10.14512/gaia.23.2.4.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., and M. Mahony. 2017. “The IPCC and the Politics of Anticipation.” Nature Climate Change 7 (5): 311–313. doi:10.1038/nclimate3264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., and M. Mahony. 2018. “The IPCC and the New Map of Science and Politics.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 9 (6): e547. doi:10.1002/wcc.547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M., and R. Lidskog. 2018a. “Deliberative Democracy Meets Democratised Science: A Deliberative Systems Approach to Global Environmental Governance.” Environmental Politics 27 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M., and R. Lidskog. 2018b. “Pathways to Deliberative Capacity: The Role of the IPCC.” Climatic Change 148 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2180-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmer-Christiansen, S. 1994. “Global Climate Protection Policy: The Limits of Scientific Advice: Part 1.” Global Environmental Change 4 (2): 140–159. doi:10.1016/0959-3780(94)90049-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, K., and J. Dodge. 2018. “Critical Policy Studies and the Politics of Post-truth Politics.” Critical Policy Studies 12 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1080/19460171.2018.1444498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, S. 2017. “Have We Given up Too Much? on Yielding Climate Representation to Experts.” Futures 91: 72–75. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. 2019. “Critical Reflections on the March for Science.” Sociological Forum 33 (1): 255–258. doi:10.1111/socf.12398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., L. Calvet-Mir, H. Hughes, and M. Paterson. 2015. “Patterns of Authorship in the IPCC Working Group III Report.” Nature Climate Change 6: 94. doi:10.1038/nclimate2782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pryck, K., and F. Gemenne. 2017. “The Denier-in-Chief: Climate Change, Science and the Election of Donald J. Trump.” Law and Critique 28 (2): 119–126. doi:10.1007/s10978-017-9207-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devès, M. H., M. Lang, P.-H. Bourrelier, and F. Valérian. 2017. “Why the IPCC Should Evolve in Response to the UNFCCC Bottom-up Strategy Adopted in Paris? an Opinion from the French Association for Disaster Risk Reduction.” Environmental Science & Policy 78: 142–148. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., L. Cameron, J. Rubis, M. Maillet, D. Nakashima, A. C. Willox, and T. Pearce. 2016. “Including Indigenous Knowledge and Experience in IPCC Assessment Reports.” Nature Climate Change 6: 349. doi:10.1038/nclimate2954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, T. 2011. “Expertise Needs Transparency Not Blind Trust: A Deliberative Approach to Integrating Science and Social Participation.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (3): 317–322. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.606305.
   Google Scholar
• Geden, O. 2018. “Politically Informed Advice for Climate Action.” Nature Geoscience 11 (6): 380–383. doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0143-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R., M. Hulme, S. Raman, E. H. Kershaw, and J. Tsouvalis. 2017. “A Reply to Cook and Oreskes on Climate Science Consensus Messaging AU - Pearce, Warren.” Environmental Communication 11 (6): 736–739. doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1392109.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P., and C. Stevens. 2011. “Organized Science, Usable Knowledge, and Multilateral Environmental Governance.” In Governing the Air: The Dynamics of Science, Policy, and Citizen Interaction, edited by R. Lidskog and G. Sundqvist, 125–162. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. 1992. “Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. 2017. “The Epistemic Authority of Solution-oriented Global Environmental Assessments.” Environmental Science & Policy 77: 221–224. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho-Lem, C., H. Zerriffi, and M. Kandlikar. 2011. “Who Participates in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Why: A Quantitative Assessment of the National Representation of Authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 21 (4): 1308–1317. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2010. “Problems with Making and Governing Global Kinds of Knowledge.” Global Environmental Change 20 (4): 558–564. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2016. “1.5 °C and Climate Research after the Paris Agreement.” Nature Climate Change 6: 222. doi:10.1038/nclimate2939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2018. “WIREs Climate Change 2018: An Editorial Essay.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 9 (1): e503. doi:10.1002/wcc.503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2013. “Future Work of the IPCC: Collated Comments from Governments. IPCC-XXXIX/INF. 1 (27.II.2014).” Thirty-ninth session of the IPCC, Berlin, Germany, 7-12 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. “Future Work of the IPCC: Compilation of Submissions by Authors, Contributing Authors and Review Editors. IPCC-XL/INF. 2, Add.1 (29.IX.2014).” Fortieth session of the IPCC Copenhagen, Denmark, 27-31 October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2016. “REPORT OF THE FORTY-THIRD SESSION OF THE IPCC, Nairobi, Kenya, 11 – 13 April 2016.” http://ipcc.ch/meeting_documentation/meeting_documentation.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, J. 1998. “Current Thinking on Using Scientific Findings in Environmental Policy Making.” Environmental Modeling & Assessment 3 (3): 143–153. doi:10.1023/A:1019066907165.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1987. “Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science.” Social Studies of Science 17 (2): 195–230. doi:10.2307/284949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univserity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2010. “A New Climate for Society.” Theory, Culture and Society 27 (2–3): 233–253. doi:10.1177/0263276409361497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kary, A., B. R. Newell, and B. K. Hayes. 2018. “What Makes for Compelling Science? Evidential Diversity in the Evaluation of Scientific Arguments.” Global Environmental Change 49: 186–196. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. H., and M. Linsey. 2018. “Facts, Power and Global Evidence: A New Empire of Truth.” Economy and Society 47 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1080/03085147.2018.1457261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. 2015. “Turning the Focus to Solutions.” Science 350 (6264): 1007. doi:10.1126/science.aad8954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., U. K. Ecker, and J. Cook. 2017. “Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “post-truth” Era.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6: 353–369. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and G. Sundqvist. 2015. “When Does Science Matter? International Relations Meets Science and Technology Studies.” Global Environmental Politics 15 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, J. E., E. Lövbrand, and J. A. Olsson. 2018. “From Climates Multiple to Climate Singular: Maintaining Policy-relevance in the IPCC Synthesis Report.” Environmental Science & Policy 90: 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfmarck, E., and R. Lidskog. 2017. “Bumping against the Boundary: IPBES and the Knowledge Divide.” Environmental Science and Policy 22. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.008.
   Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., S. Beck, J. Chilvers, T. Forsyth, J. Hedren, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, and E. Vasileiadou. 2015. “Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene.” Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, M., and M. Hulme. 2018. “Epistemic Geographies of Climate Change: Science,space and Politics.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (3): 395–424. doi:10.1177/0309132516681485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. 2016. “Deliberative Elitism? Distributed Deliberation and the Organization of Epistemic Inequality.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 191–208. doi:10.1080/19460171.2016.1165126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, M. 2018. “The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4): 782–788. doi:10.1017/S1049096518000938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., R. Grundmann, M. Hulme, S. Raman, E. H. Kershaw, and J. Tsouvalis. 2017. “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus.” Environmental Communication 11 (6): 723–730. doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1333965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., M. Mahony, and S. Raman. 2018. “Science Advice for Global Challenges: Learning from Trade-offs in the IPCC.” Environmental Science and Policy 80: 125–131. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P. 2016. “The ‘best Available Science’ to Inform 1.5 °C Policy Choices.” Nature Climate Change 6: 646. doi:10.1038/nclimate3000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. J., T. R. Kuhn, and B. Nerlich. 2018. “Organizing Authority in the Climate Change Debate: IPCC Controversies and the Management of Dialectical Tensions.” Organization Studies 39 (7): 873–898. doi:10.1177/0170840617707999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pregernig, M. 2014. “Framings of Science-Policy Interactions and Their Discursive and Institutional Effects: Examples from Conservation and Environmental Policy.” Biodiversity and Conservation 23 (14): 3615–3639. doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0806-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. K. 1981. “The Spectrum from Truth to Power.” In Science, Technology, and National Policy, edited by T. J. Kuehn and A. L. Porter, 95–132. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, R. F. 1991. “Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Utilization: Perspectives of the Founding Editor of Knowledge.” Science Communication 12 (3): 319–337. doi:10.1177/107554709101200308.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. C. 2014. “Five Ways to Enhance the Impact of Climate Science.” Nature Climate Change 4: 522. doi:10.1038/nclimate2270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruijt, P., A. B. Knol, E. Vasileiadou, J. Devilee, E. Lebret, and A. C. Petersen. 2014. “Roles of Scientists as Policy Advisers on Complex Issues: A Literature Review.” Environmental Science & Policy 40: 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stressheim, H., and P. Kettunen. 2014. “When Does Evidence-based Policy Turn into Policy-based Evidence? Configurations, Contexts, and Mechanisms.” Evidence & Policy 10 (2): 259–277. doi:10.1332/174426514X13990433991320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G., D. Gasper, A. L. St.Clair, E. A. T. Hermansen, S. Yearley, I. Øvstebø Tvedten, and B. Wynne. 2018. “One World or Two? Science–Policy Interactions in the Climate Field.” Critical Policy Studies 12 (4): 448–468. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1374193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellstead, A., M. Howlett, and J. Rayner. 2017. “Structural-functionalism Redux: Adaptation to Climate Change and the Challenge of a Science-driven Policy Agenda.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (4): 391–410. doi:10.1080/19460171.2016.1166972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar