Measuring the link between democracy and transparent lobbying

References

• Abromeit, H. 1998. Democracy in Europe: Legitimizing Politics in a Non-State Polity. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, M., and E. Ziglio. 1996. Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, R., and M. O’Hara. 1999. “Market Transparency: Who Wins and Who Loses?” The Review of Financial Studies 12 (1): 5–35. doi:10.1093/rfs/12.1.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowers, A., J. Boersema, and M. Adrian. 2005. “Experts, Decision Making and Deliberative Democracy.” Environmental Sciences 2 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1080/15693430500111793.
   Google Scholar
• Bühlmann, M., W. Merkel, L. Müller, and B. Wessels. 2012. “The Democracy Barometer: A New Instrument to Measure the Quality of Democracy and Its Potential for Comparative Research.” European Political Science 11 (1): 519–536. doi:10.1057/eps.2011.46.
   Google Scholar
• Bushman, R., J. Piotroski, and A. Smith. 2004. “What Determines Corporate Transparency?” Journal of Accounting Research 2: 207–252. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00136.x.
   Google Scholar
• Chari, R., J. Hogan, and G. Murphy. 2010. Regulating Lobbying: A Global Comparison. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Churchwell, C. 2003. “Corporate Transparency Improves for Foreign Firms in US Markets.” Harvard Business School Working Knowledge Series. [Accessed 09 July 2018]. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3489.html
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D., and S. Levitsky. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics 49 (3): 430–451. doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., and D. D. Searing. 2005. “Studying ‘Everyday Political Talk’ in the Deliberative System.” Acta Politica 40 (3): 269–283. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. 2005. “Deliberation in Movement: Why and How to Study Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements.” Acta Politica 40: 336–350. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. J., and L. Morlino. 2004. “The Quality of Democracy. An Overview.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 20–31. doi:10.1353/jod.2004.0060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economic Intelligence Unit. 2017. “Democracy Index 2016.” [Accessed 09 July 2018]. http://www.eiu.com/Handlers/WhitepaperHandler.ashx?fi=Democracy-Index-2016.pdf&mode=wp&campaignid=DemocracyIndex2016
   Google Scholar
• ERCAS. 2017. “European Public Accountability Mechanisms.” [Accessed 09 July 2018]. http://europam.eu/?module=overview
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. 2011. When the People Speak. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-960443-2.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., and R. C. Luskin. 2005. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica 40 (3): 284–298. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleuss, D., K. Helbig, and G. S. Schaal. 2018. “Four Parameters for Measuring Democratic Deliberation: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges and How to Respond.” Politics and Governance 6 (1): 11–21. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i1.1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M., R. Huisman, K. Koedijk, and R. Mahieu. 1999. “Quote Disclosure and Price Discovery in Multiple-dealer Financial Markets.” Review of Financial Studies 1: 37–59. doi:10.1093/rfs/12.1.37.
   Google Scholar
• Forssbaeck, J., and L. Oxelheim. 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Economic and Institutional Transparency. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2017. “Freedom of the World 2017.” [Accessed 09 July 2018]. https://freedomhouse.org/report/methodology-freedom-world-2017
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., M. Kneuer, and H. J. Lauth. 2016. “Measuring the Quality of Democracy: Introduction.” International Political Science Review 37 (5): 571–579. doi:10.1177/019251216669141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goehring, R. 2002. “Interest Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union: The New Quest for Civil Society Formation.” In Influence and Interests in the European Union: The New Politics of Persuasion and Advocacy, edited by A. Warleigh and J. Fairbrass, 118–138. London: Europa Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Granados, N., A. Gupta, and R. Kauffman. 2006. “The Impact of IT on Market Information and Transparency: A Unified Theoretical Framework.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7 (3): 148–178. doi:10.17705/1jais.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1990. Discourse Ethics: Notes on the Program of Philosophical Justification. In Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., and D. Grelling. 2013. “Transparency, E-government, and Accountability.” Public Performance & Management Review 36 (4): 562–584. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetzek, T., M. Avital, and N. Bjorn-Andersen. 2013. “The Generative Mechanisms of Open Government Data. Utrecht: The 21st European Conference on Information Systems.” [Accessed 09 July 2018]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thorhildur_Jetzek/publication/259501249_Generating_Value_from_Open_Government_Data/links/0046352c535fb81d99000000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, J., J. Peek, and E. Rosengren. 2000. “The Market Reaction to the Disclosure of Supervisory Actions: Implications for Bank Transparency.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 3: 298–319. doi:10.1006/jfin.2000.0292.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J., and J. Johnson. 1997. “What Sort of Equality Does Deliberative Democracy Require?” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by J. Bohman and W. Rehg, 280–319. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laboutková, Š. 2017. “Identifying a Connection between Transparent Lobbying and Quality of Democracy.” In Proceedings of the 13th Liberec Economic Forum 2017, edited by A. Kocourek, 439–446. Liberec: Technical University of Liberec. ISBN 978-80-7494-349-2.
   Google Scholar
• Laboutková, Š., and P. Vymětal. 2017. “Transparency in Economic and Political Decision-Making: The Identification of Sunshine Rules for Transparent Lobbying.” DANUBE: Law and Economics Review 8 (3): 157–171. doi:10.1515/danb-2017-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Laboutková, Š., and P. Vymětal. 2018. “Key Elements of Transparent Lobbying: Relevance of Wider Approach.” Public Policy and Administration 17 (2). doi:10.13165/VPA-18-17-2-01.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic. Systems. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” The American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69–105. doi:10.2307/1951731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan, A., D. Porter, and D. Weaver. 2005. “Should Securities Markets Be Transparent?” Journal of Financial Markets 8 (3): 265–287. doi:10.1016/j.finmar.2005.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. G, R. T. Gurr, and K. Jaggers. 2014. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800 – 2013.” Data User´s Manual. [Accessed 09 July 2018]. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html
   Google Scholar
• Pickel, S., T. Stark, and W. Breusted. 2015. “Assessing the Quality of Quality Measures of Democracy: A Theoretical Framework and Its Empirical Application.” European Political Science 14 (4): 496–520. doi:10.1057/eps.2015.61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraad-Tischler, D., P. Paulini, and S. Empter. 2016. “Sustainable Government Indicator.” [Accessed 09 July 2018]. http://www.sgi-network.org/2016/Questionnaire
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. 2016. “The Boundaries of a Deliberative System: The Case of Disruptive Protest.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 152–170. doi:10.1080/19460171.2016.1165128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 1999. On Liberty, the Right to Know, and Public Discourse: The Role of Transparency in Public Life. Oxford, UK: Oxford Amnesty Lecture. January 27. Accessed 09 July 2018. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.594.93&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical PoliticalScience.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497–520. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TI. 2015. “Lobbying in Europe: Hidden Influence, Privileged Access“. [Accessed 09 July 2018]. http://www.transparencyinternational.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Lobbying_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Warleigh, A. 2003. “Informal Governance: Improving EU Democracy?” In Informal Governance in the European Union, edited by T. Christiansen and S. Piattoni, 22–36. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wendler, F. 2002. “Neue Legitimationsquellen für Europa? Verbände in der europäischen Sozialpolitik.” Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen 9: 253–274. doi:10.5771/0946-7165-2002-2.
   Google Scholar
• Wene, C. O., and R. Espejo. 1999. “A Meaning for Transparency in Decision Processes”. In Proceedings of the first VALDOR symposium, edited by K. Andersson, 402-21. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate.
   Google Scholar
• World Justice Project. 2015. “WJP Open Government Index.” [Accessed 09 July 2018]. https://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/ogi_methodology_0.pdf
   Google Scholar