Implementation of indigenous public policies and tensions to governance: evidences from the Chilean case

References

• Barzelay, M., F. Gaetani, J. Cortázar, and G. Cejudo. 2003. “Research on Public Management Policy Change in the Latin America Region: A Conceptual Framework and Methodological Guide.” International Public Management Review 4 (1): 20–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bengoa, J. 2000. La Emergencia Indígena En América Latina. Santiago (Chile): Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. 2007. Encyclopedia of Governance I. UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bolados, P. 2012. “Neoliberalismo Multicultural En El Chile Postdictadura: La Política Indígena En Salud Y Sus Efectos En Comunidades Mapuche Y Atacameñas.” Chungara, Revista De Antropologi´a Chilena 44 (1): 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and P. T´Hart. 2016. “Revisiting the Study of Policy Failure.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (5): 653–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIIR. 2019. Encuesta “Estudio longitudinal de relaciones interculturales.” Santiago: Centro de Estudios Interculturales e Indígenas. Accessed 3 August 2019. http://www.elri.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ResultadosPrimeraOla.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CNID. 2018. Reportes De Futuro. Tres Preocupaciones Urgentes Para Chile. Santiago: CNID.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, S., and J. P. Kalt. 2000. “Where’s the Glue: Institutional and Cultural Foundations of American Indian Economic Development.” Journal of Socio-Economics 29 (5): 443–470. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00080-9.
   Google Scholar
• CRITERIA. 2016. Encuesta Nº 2 “Otra mirada ciudadana.” Fundación Chile 21. Santiago. Accessed 3 August 2019. https://msgg.gob.cl/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/152104-Encuesta-Diciembre.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., and V. Lapuente. 2017. Organizing the Leviathan: How the Relationship between Politicians and Bureaucrats Shapes Good Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. 2014. “Contesting Governance Hegemonies: Developments in Critical Theory and Practice, Part 2.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (2): 129–132. doi:10.1080/19460171.2014.909200.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M. 2014. “The Concept of Governance in the Spirit of Capitalism.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1080/19460171.2014.883854.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. 2019. “Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis.” Public Organization Review 10 (3): 245–258. doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0137-0.
   Google Scholar
• Figueroa Huencho, V. 2017. “Institucionalidad Pública, Participación Y Representación Política De Los Pueblos Indígenas En Chile.” In El Pueblo Mapuche En El Siglo XXI: Propuestas Para Un Nuevo Entendimiento Entre Culturas En Chile, edited by I. Aninat, V. Figueroa, and R. González, 227–264. Santiago de Chile: CEP.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2007. “The Case Study: What It Is and What It Does.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by C. Boix and S. Stokes, 90–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., and P. Hupe. 2009. Implementing Public Policy. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks.: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and M. Ramesh. 2014. “The Two Orders of Governance Failure: Design Mismatches and Policy Capacity Issues in Modern Governance.” Policy and Society 33 (4): 317–327. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huencho, F., O. Verónica, and B. Navarrete. 2010. “Política De Modernización De La Gestión Pública En Chile 1990-2006: Evidencias a Partir De Un Modelo De Análisis.” Convergencia 57 (18): 61–99.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R., V. M. Wilkins, K. J. Meier, and C. A. Holland. 2002. “Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 553–564. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, F. 2013. “Diez Años De Alta Dirección Pública En Chile.” In XVIII Congreso Internacional Del CLAD Sobre La R Eforma Del Estado Y De La Administración Pública. Uruguay: Montevideo.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., and M. Shugart. 2002. Presidencialismo Y Democracia En América Latina. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, P. 2006. “El Método De Estudio De Caso. Estrategia Metodológica De La Investigación Científica.” Pensamiento & Gestión 20: 165–193.
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D., and P. Sabatier. 1989. Implementation and Public Policy. MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M., R. Noll, and B. R. Weingast. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law Economics and Organization 3 (2): 243–277.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. 1993. “Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition.” Research in Public Administration 69 (2): 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• NHRI. 2015. Third National Survey of Human Rights 2015. Santiago: National Human Rights Institute. Accessed 3 August 2019. https://www.indh.cl/indh-presenta-encuesta-nacional-de-derechos-humanos-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Olavarría-Gambi, M. 2017. “Policy Implementation: Lessons from the Chilean Policy on Public Management Modernization.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 11 (1): 41–54. doi:10.1515/cejpp-2016-0030.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J., and G. Peters. 1996. Lessons from Experience. Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Countries. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2007. “Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” In Theories of the Policy, edited by P. A. Sabatier, 21–64. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pairican, F., and R. Alvarez. 2011. “La Nueva Guerra De Arauco: La Coordinadora Arauco Malleco En El Chile De La Concertación De Partidos Por La Democracia (1997-2009)”. Revista www.izquierdas.cl 10: 66–84.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2011. “Governance as Political Theory.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (1): 63–72. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.555683.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and G. Peters. 2005. Governing Complex Societies. Trajectories and Scenarios. UK: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N., and G. Van Ryzin. 2016. “Representative Bureaucracy: A Lever to Enhance Social Equity, Coproduction, and Democracracy.” Public Administration Review 20 (20): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N., and M. Meyers. 2004. “Linking Passive and Active Representation: The Case of Front-Line Workers in Welfare Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (4): 585–597. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, H. 2019. “Extractivismo En Chile: La Producción Del Territorio Minero Y Las Luchas Del Pueblo Aimara En El Norte Grande.” Colombia Internacional, no. 98: 3–30. doi:10.7440/colombiaint98.2019.01.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, B. 2011. “Governance as Political Theory: Through the Lens of Gender. A Response to B. Guy Peters.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 454–457. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.628070.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and M. Sidney. 2009. “What Is Next for Policy Design and Social Construction Theory?1.” The Policy Studies Journal 37 (1): 103–118. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00298.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibel, W. 2010. “Beyond Bureaucracy. Public Administration as Political Integrator and Non-Weberian.” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 719–730. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02200.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekher, M., and R. Kattumuri. 2018. “Understanding Governance as a Process.” In Governance and Governed Multi-country Perspectives on State, Society and Development, edited by M. Sekher and R. Kattumuri, 15–24. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard. M. 2004. “Representative bureaucracy.” In Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy, edited by D. Schultz, 368. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and K. Monaghan. 2013. “Some Ceilings Have More Cracks: Representative Bureaucracy in Federal Regulatory Agencies.” The American Review of Public Administration 43 (1): 50–71. doi:10.1177/0275074011420997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowa, J., and S. Selden. 2003. “Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy.” Public Administration Review 63 (6): 700–710. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, E., and M. Tommasi. 2007. “The Institutional Determinants of State Capabilities in Latin America.” In Conferencia Anual Del Banco Mundial Sobre Economía Del Desarrollo: Más Allá De La Transición, edited by F. Bourguignon and B. Pleskovic, 1–39. Washington, DC, Estados Unidos: Banco Mundial.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. 2012. “Consenso De Los Commodities, Giro Ecoterritorial Y Pensamiento Crítico En América Latina.” OSAL Observatorio Social De América Latina 32: 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tommasi, M. 2011. “Latin America: How State Capacity Determines Policy Success.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24 (2): 199–203. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01528.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1997. Governance for Sustainable Human Development. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Valles, M. 2007. Técnicas Cualitativas De Investigación Social: Reflexión Metodológica Y Práctica Profesional. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
   Google Scholar
• Vancoppenolle, D., H. Sætren, and P. Hupe. 2015. “The Politics of Policy Design and Implementation: A Comparative Study of Two Belgian Service Voucher Programs.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 17 (2): 157–173. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1006831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zurbriggen, C. 2011. “Gobernanza: Una Mirada Desde América Latina.” Perfiles Latinoamericanos 19 (38): 39–64.
   Google Scholar