Conceding in disagreements during small group interactions in academic writing class

References

• Antaki , C. 1994 . Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Arminen , I. 2005 . Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work , Aldershot : Ashgate .
   Google Scholar
• Bonito , J.A. and Sanders , R.E. 2002 . Speakers’ footing in a collaborative writing task: A resource for addressing disagreement while avoiding conflict . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 35 : 481 – 514 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen , M. 1989 . “ The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks ” . In The second language curriculum , Edited by: Johnson , R.K. 187 – 206 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , P. and Levinson , S.C. 1987 . Politeness: Some universals in language usage , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Davidson , J. 1984 . “ Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection ” . In Structures of social action , Edited by: Atkinson , J.M. and Heritage , J. 102 – 128 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Frazier , S. 2007 . Tellings of remembrances ‘touched off’ by student reports in group work in undergraduate writing classes . Applied Linguistics , 28 : 189 – 210 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, D. 2010. Agreements and disagreements: The small group discussion in a foreign language classroom. In Pragmatics and language learning, ed. G. Kasper, H.t. Nguyen, D.R. Yoshimi, and J.K. Yoshioka, vol. 12, 297–325. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign language Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner , R. 2004 . “ On delaying the answer: Question sequences extended after the question ” . In Second language conversations , Edited by: Gardner , R. and Wagner , J. 246 – 266 . London : Continuum .
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel , H. and Sacks , H. 1970 . “ On formal structures of practical actions ” . In Theoretical sociology , Edited by: McKinney , J.C. and Tiryakian , E.A. 337 – 366 . New York , NY : AppletonCentury-Crofts .
   Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulou , A. 2001 . Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations . Journal of Pragmatics , 33 : 1881 – 1900 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin , C. 1981 . Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers , New York , NY : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , M.H. 1990 . He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children , Bloomington , IN : Indiana University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Haller , C.R. , Gallagher , V.J. , Weldon , T.L. and Felder , R.M. 2000 . Dynamics of peer education in cooperative learning workgroups . Journal of Engineering Education , 89 : 285 – 293 .
   Google Scholar
• Have , P. ten . 2007 . Doing conversation analysis , 2nd edn , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 1984 . “ A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J.M. and Heritage , J. 57 – 101 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 1988 . “ Explanations as accounts: A conversation-analytic approach ” . In Analyzing everyday explanation , Edited by: Antaki , C. 127 – 144 . London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J.C. and Watson , R. 1979 . “ Formulations as conversational objects ” . In Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology , Edited by: Psathas , G. 123 – 162 . New York , NY : Irvington .
   Google Scholar
• Holt , E. 2010 . The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination . Journal of Pragmatics , 42 : 1513 – 1525 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs , S. 2002 . Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree . Journal of Pragmatics , 34 : 1403 – 1426 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. 1979 . “ A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination ” . In Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology , Edited by: Psathas , G. 79 – 96 . New York , NY : Irvington Publishers Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. 1984 . “ On step-wise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters ” . In Structures of social action , Edited by: Atkinson , J.M. and Heritage , J.C. 191 – 222 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kangasharju , H. 2002 . Alignment in disagreement: Forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings . Journal of Pragmatics , 34 : 1447 – 1471 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper , G. and Ross , S.J. 2007 . Multiple questions in oral proficiency interviews . Journal of Pragmatics , 39 : 2045 – 2070 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppler , A. and Luckmann , T. 1991 . “ ‘Teaching’: Conversational transmission of knowledge ” . In Asymmetries in dialogue , Edited by: Markovà , I. and Foppa , K. 143 – 65 . Hemel Hempstead : Harvester Wheatsheaf .
   Google Scholar
• Keys , C.W. 1996 . Writing collaborative laboratory reports in ninth grade science. Three case studies of social interactions . School Science and Mathematics , 96 : 178 – 186 .
   Google Scholar
• Koshik , I. 2002 . A conversation-analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions . Journal of Pragmatics , 34 : 1851 – 1877 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotthoff , H. 1993 . Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures . Language in Society , 22 : 193 – 216 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu , B. 2003 . Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching , New Haven , CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Leki , I. 2001 . ‘A narrow thinking system’: Non-native English speaking students in group work projects across the curriculum . TESOL Quarterly , 35 : 39 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. (ed.) 2004. Collaborative turn sequences. In Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 225–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mori , J. 1999 . ‘Well I may be exaggerating but’…: Self-qualifying clauses in negotiation of opinions among Japanese speakers . Human Studies , 22 : 447 – 473 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori , J. 2003 . The construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 36 : 143 – 184 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntigl , P. and Turnbull , W. 1998 . Conversational structure and facework in arguing . Journal of Pragmatics , 29 ( 3 ) : 225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1984 . “ Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J.M. and Heritage , J. 57 – 101 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1986 . Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims . Human Studies , 9 : 219 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter , J. 1996 . Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Sacks , H. , Schegloff , E.A. and Jefferson , G. 1974 . A simplest systematics of turn-taking for conversation . Language , 50 : 696 – 735 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. and E.A. Schegloff. 1979. Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction, ed. G. Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E.A. 2007 . Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin , D. 1987 . Discourse markers , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe , E.H. 2000 . Constructing topicality in university students’ small group discussion: A conversation analytic approach . Language and Education , 14 : 184 – 203 .
   Google Scholar
• Storch , N. 2005 . Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections . Journal of Second Language Writing , 14 : 153 – 173 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain , M. and Lapkin , S. 1995 . Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning . Applied Linguistics , 16 : 371 – 391 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi , T. 1999 . ‘Questions’ in argument sequences in Japanese . Human Studies , 22 : 397 – 423 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuchinich , S. 1990 . “ The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict ” . In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations , Edited by: Grimshaw , A. 118 – 139 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Waring , H.Z. 2001 . Balancing the competing interests in seminar discussion: Peer referencing and asserting vulnerability . Issues in Applied Linguistics , 12 : 29 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• Waring , H.Z. 2005 . Peer tutoring in a graduate writing center: Identity, expertise and advice resisting . Applied Linguistics , 26 : 141 – 168 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer , M. 2002 . Networking into academic discourse . Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 1 : 45 – 58 .
   Google Scholar