Locating agency in the classroom: A metaphor analysis of teacher talk in a college developmental reading class

References

• ACT. 2013. The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2013. http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr13/pdf/CCCR13-NationalReadinessRpt.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ahearn, L. M. 2001. “Language and Agency.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–137.10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. L. 2007. “Beginning the Literacy Transition: Postsecondary students’ Conceptualizations of Academic Writing in Developmental Literacy Contexts.” Unpublished Dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. L., H. Davis, and E. J. Paulson. 2011. “The Subjectivity Problem: Improving Triangulation Approaches in Metaphor Analysis Studies.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 10 (2): 151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2008. “Toward an Agentic Theory of the Self.” In Self-Processes, Learning, and Enabling Human Potential: Dynamic New Approaches, edited by H. Marsh, R. G. Craven and D. M. McInerney, 15–49. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D. 1971. “Language and Learning in the Classroom.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 3 (1): 27–38.10.1080/0022027710030104
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. 2009. “Distinguishing the Power of Agency from Agentic Power: A Note on Weber and the “Black Box” of Personal Agency.” Sociological Theory 27 (4): 407–418.10.1111/soth.2009.27.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, E., M. J. Zimmer-Gembeck, P. A. Creed, and M. Tucker. 2006. “An Integrative Study of Multiple Correlates of Reading: Family History, Self-Perceptions, Attitudes, Ability, and Neural Processing.” Journal of Research on Reading 29: 11–32.10.1111/jrir.2006.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortazzi, M., and L. Jin. 1999. “Bridges to Learning: Metaphors of Teaching, Learning and Language.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor, edited by L. Cameron and G. Low, 149–176. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524704
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023.10.1086/ajs.1998.103.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennimore, B. S. 2000. Talk Matters: Refocusing the Language of Public Schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970 [1993]. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York/London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2000. “Discourse and Sociocultural Studies in Reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research. vol. III, edited by M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson and R. Barr, 195–207. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M., and A. M. Marek. 1996. “Retrospective Miscue Analysis.” In Retrospective Miscue Analysis: Revaluing Readers and Reading, edited by Y. M. Goodman and A. M. Marek, 39–47. Katonah, NY: Richard C. Owen Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• de Guerrero, M., and O. S. Villamil. 2002. “Metaphorical Conceptualizations of ESL Teaching and Learning.” Language Teaching Research 6 (2): 95–120.10.1191/1362168802lr101oa
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., and N. Quinn eds. 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H. 2004. Choice Words: How Our Language Affects Children’s Learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kovecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ley, K., and D. B. Young. 1998. “Self-Regulation Behaviors in Underprepared (Developmental) and Regular Admission College Students.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 23: 42–64.10.1006/ceps.1997.0956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. L., and R. J. Marzono. 1990. “Putting the Self in Self-Regulated Learning: The Self as Agent in Integrating Will and Skill.” Educational Psychologist 25 (1): 51–69.10.1207/s15326985ep2501_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 1995. “Talking about Science: An Interpretation of the Effects of Teacher Talk in a High School Science Classroom.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32 (4): 349–371.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nist, S. L., and M. L. Simpson. 2000. “College Studying.” In Handbook of Reading Research. vol. III, edited by M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson and R. Barr, 645–666. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, E. J., and S. L. Armstrong. 2011. “Mountains and Pit Bulls: Students’ Metaphors for College Reading and Writing.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 54 (7): 494–503.10.1598/JAAL.54.7.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V. 2004. “Ethnographic Research.” In Literacy Research Methodologies, edited by N. K. Duke and M. H. Mallette, 92–113. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., and R. Bruning. 1996. “Readers’ Implicit Models of Reading.” Reading Research Quarterly 31 (3): 290–305.10.1598/RRQ.31.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., and R. Bruning. 1999. “How Implicit Models of Reading Affect Motivation to Read and Reading Engagement.” Scientific Studies of Reading 3 (3): 281–302.10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_5
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, M. L., and Nist, S. L. 2002. “Encouraging Active Reading at the College Level.” In Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices, edited by C. Collins Block and M. Pressley , 365–377. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, N. A., and J. R. King. 2009. “A History of College Reading.” In Handbook of College Reading and Study Strategy Research. 2nd ed, edited by R. F. Flippo and D. C. Caverly, 3–25. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vacca, R. T. 2006. “They Can Because They Think They Can.” Educational Leadership 63 (5): 56–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V., and L. J. Rupert. 1993. “The Authority of Cultural Tools in a Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Agency.” Cognition and Instruction 11: 227–239.10.1080/07370008.1993.9649022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V., P. Tulviste, and F. Hagstrom. 1993. “A Sociocultural Approach to Agency.” In Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Children’s Development, edited by E. A. Forman, N. Minick and C. A. Stone, 336–356. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. J., and R. Bruning. 2005. “Implicit Writing Beliefs and Their Relation to Writing Quality.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 30 (2): 166–189.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., and N. G. Lederman. 1989. “The Effect of Teachers’ Language on Students’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26 (9): 771–783.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar