Control, membership and consequences: Analysis of discursive practices to respond to behaviors of kindergartners with disabilities

References

• Orsati, F. T. 2014. “Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators Regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom”. Education Research International. Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/325430
   Google Scholar
• Orsati, F., and Causton-Theoharis. 2013. “Challenging Control: Inclusive Teachers’ and Teaching Assistants’ Discourse on Students with Challenging Cehaviour.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (5): 507–525, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.689016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Moshe, L. 2011. Disabling Incarceration: Connecting Disability to Divergent Confinements in the USA. Critical Sociology 39 (3): 385–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., and S. K. Biklen. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. 2003. Ability Profiling and School Failure: One Child’s Struggle to Be Seen as Competent. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Curwood, J. S. 2007. “What Happened to Kindergarten? Are Academic Pressures Stealing Childhood?” Instructor, August. http://www.scholastic.com/teachers/article/what-happened-kindergarten
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, S. 2009. “Compliance as Alienated Labor: A Critical Analysis of Public School Programs for Students Considered to Have Emotional/Behavioral Disorders.” In Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method, edited by S. Gabel, 85–102. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2007. “Standards, Accountability, and School Reform.” In Facing Accountability in Education: Democracy and Equity at Risk, edited by C. Sleeter, 78–111. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVore, S., and K. Russell. 2007. “Early Childhood Education and Care for Children with Disabilities: Facilitating Inclusive Practice.” Early Childhood Education Journal 35 (2): 189–198.10.1007/s10643-006-0145-4
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society 4 (2): 249–283.10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. 2005. “Rewriting Critical Pedagogy from the Periphery: Materiality, Disability and the Politics of Schooling.” In Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method, edited by S. Gabel, 65–83. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2001. Language and Power. New York: Pearson Education Limite.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A., and D. Connor. 2006. Reading Resistance: Discourse of Exclusion in Desegregation & Inclusion Debate. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Filler, J., and Y. Xu. 2012. “Including Children with Disabilities in Early Childhood Education Programs: Individualizing Developmentally Appropriate Practices.” Childhood Education 83 (2): 92–98.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 2005. Pedagogia Do Oprimido [Pedagogy of the Oppressed]. 47th ed. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, S. 2009. “Introduction: Disability Studies in Education.” In Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method, edited by S. Gabel, 1–20. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, D. J. 2008. “The Natural Hierarchy Undone: Disability Studies’ Contributions to Contemporary Debates in Education.” In Vital Questions Facing Disability Studies in Education, edited by S. Danforth and S. Gabel, 63–75. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011a. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011b. “Discourse Analysis: What Makes It Critical?” In An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education, edited by R. Rogers, 23–45. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graue, M. E. 2001. What’s Happening in the Children’s Garden? Young Children 56 (3): 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, T. 2005. New Directions in Special Education: Eliminating Ableism in Policy and Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. T., and D. M. Valle-Riestra. 2007. “Experiences of Kindergarten Teachers Implementing Instructional Practices for Diverse Learners.” International Journal of Special Education 22 (2): 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. 1996. Beyond Discipline: From Compliance to Community. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development.
   Google Scholar
• Litty, C. G., and A. Hatch. 2006. “Hurry up and Wait: Rethinking Special Education Identification in Kindergarten.” Early Childhood Education Journal 33 (4): 203–208.10.1007/s10643-005-0048-9
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, H. 1996. Learning to Listen: Positive Approaches and People with Difficult Behavior. Boston, MA: Paul Brooks Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Meiners, E. R. 2007. Right to Be Hostile: Schools, Prisons, and the Making of Public Enemies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G., and K. J. Fox. 2004. “Building Bridges: The Possibility of Analytic Dialogue between Ethnography, Conversation Analysis and Foucault.” In Qualitative Research, edited by D. Silverman, 35–55. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Rights Network. 2009. Schools Are Not Supposed to Hurt: Investigative Report on Abusive Restraint and Seclusion in Schools. http://www.ndrn.org/en/media/publications.html
   Google Scholar
• Philips, L., and M. Jorgensen. 2002. Discourse Analysis and Theory and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. L. 2010. “From Child’s Garden to Academic Press: The Role of Shifting Institutional Logics in Redefining Kindergarten Education.” American Educational Research Journal 48 (2): 236–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailor, W., and J. L. Paul. 2004. “Framing Positive Behavior Support in the Ongoing Discourse concerning the Politics of Knowledge.” Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 6 (1): 37–49.10.1177/10983007040060010601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. 2007. The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Skrtic, T. M. 1995. Disability and Democracy: Reconstructing (Special Education for Postmodernity). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. J., S. Danforth, and S. Nice. 2005. “Creating a Participatory Class Community.” In Engaging Troubling Students: A Constructivist Approach, edited by S. Danforth and T. J. Smith, 57–91. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. 2008. “Before It Had a Name.” In Vital Questions Facing Disability Studies in Education, edited by S. Danforth and S. Gabel, x–xxiii. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, S. 1982. A Sociology of Special Education. London: Routledge and Kegan.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. 2009. Seclusions and Restraints: Selected Cases of Death and Abuse at Public and Private Schools and Treatment Centers. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-719T.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, L. 2009. “Many Possible Futures, Many Different Directions: Merging Critical Special Education and Disability Studies.” In Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method, edited by S. Gabel, 103–124. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., and M. Meyer. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 1–33. Washington, DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar