Examining booktalks to shed light on authentic classroom discussion

References

• Adler, Mary, Eija Rougle, Eileen Kaiser, and Samantha Caughlan. 2003. “Closing the Gap between Concept and Practice: Toward More Dialogic Discussion in the Language Arts Classroom.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 47 (4): 312–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albritton, T. 1992. “Honest Questions and the Teaching of English.” English Education 24 (2): 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. 2008a. Essays on Pedagogy. New York; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. 2008b. “Culture, Dialogue and Learning: Notes on an Emerging Pedagogy.” In Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes, edited by N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson, 91–114. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Almasi, J. 1996. “A New View of Discussion.” In Lively Discussions! Fostering Engaged Reading, edited by L. Cambrell and J. Almasi, 2–24. Newark: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. 2002. “Engaging Students in the Disciplines of English: What Are Effective Schools Doing?” English Journal 91 (6): 30–36.10.2307/821813
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A., J. Langer, M. Nystrand, and A. Gamoran. 2003. “Discussion-based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (3): 685–730. doi:10.3102/00028312040003685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, C. 2002. And with a Light Touch: Learning about Reading, Writing, and Teaching with First Graders. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Translated and edited by C. Emerson. Minneapolis, MN: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. 1993. Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. 1986. “Classroom Discourse.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by M. C. Wittrock, 432–463. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Cazden.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. 2001. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Christoph, J. N., and M. Nystrand. 2001. “Taking Risks, Negotiating Relationships: One Teachers Transition toward a Dialogic Classroom.” Research in the Teaching of English 36 (2): 249–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colfer, E. 2002. Artemis Fowl. New York: Hyperion Paperbacks For Children.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, J., and C. Collier. 1985. My Brother Sam is Dead. New York: Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers.
   Google Scholar
• Crump, C. 1996. Teacher Immediacy: What Students Consider to Be Effective Teacher Behaviors. Texas. ( ERIC Reproduction Document Service No. ED390099).
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. 1993. Social Worlds of Children Learning to Write. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R., R. Fretz, and L. Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226206851.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gallas, K. 1994. The Languages of Learning: How Children Talk, Write, Dance, Draw, and Sing Their Understanding of the World. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallas, K. 1999. “Story Time as a Magical Act Open Only to the Initiated: What Some Children Don’t Know about Power and May Not Find out.” In Teaching Language Arts: Learning through Dialogue, edited by J. W. Lindfors and J. S. Townsend, 70–83. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. 1996. “What Research Reveals about Discussion.” In Lively Discussions! Fostering Engaged Reading, edited by L. Cambrell and J. Almasi, 25–38. Newark: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, Robyn M., and Asaduzzaman Khan. 2009. “Promoting Reasoned Argumentation, Problem-solving and Learning during Small-group Work.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (1): 7–27. doi:10.1080/03057640802701945.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. 1983. Writing: Teachers and Children at Work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, Maughn Rollins. 2007. “A Framework for Facilitating Classroom Dialogue. Edited by Michael Goldman.” Teaching Philosophy 30 (1): 59–84.10.5840/teachphil200730141
   Google Scholar
• Hadjioannou, X. 2007. “Bringing the Background to the Foreground: What Do Classroom Environments That Support Authentic Discussions Look like?” American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) 44 (2): 370–399.10.3102/0002831207302173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjioannou, X., and E. Loizou. 2011. “Talking about Books with Young Children: Analyzing the Texture of Talk in One-to-One Booktalks.” Early Education and Development Journal 22 (1): 53–76.10.1080/10409280903544389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. 1990. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203330340
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, B., and G. Chalk. 1986. Redwall. New York: Philomel Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kachur, R., and C. Prendergast. 1997. “A Closer Look at Authentic Interaction: Profiles of Two Teachers-Student Talk in Two Classrooms.” In Opening Dialogue, edited by M. Nystrand, A. Gamoran, R. Kachur and C. Prendergast, 75–88. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, E. 2007. “Building Fires: Raising Achievement through Class Discussion.” English Journal 96 (4): 16–18.10.2307/30047157
   Google Scholar
• Konigsburg, E. 1968. From the Mixed-up Files of Mrs Basil E. Frankweiler. New York: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, J. 1995. Envisioning Literature: Literary Understanding and Literature Instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, J. 1999. “Thinking and doing Literature: An Eight Year Study.” English Journal 87 (2): 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lindfors, J. 1987. Children’s Language and Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lindfors, J. 1999. Children’s Inquiry: Using Language to Make Sense of the World. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, and C. Sams. 2004. “Reasoning as a Scientist: Ways of Helping Children to Use Language to Learn Science.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 359–377.10.1080/01411920410001689689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, K. 2005. “Creating Zones of Possibility for Struggling Readers: A Study of One Fourth Grader’s Shifting Roles in Literature Discussions.” Journal of Literacy Research 36 (4): 419–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 1997. “Dialogic Instruction: When Recitation Becomes Conversation.” In Opening Dialogue, edited by M. Nystrand, et al., 1–29. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 2002. “Dialogic Discourse Analysis of Revision in Response Groups.” In Discourse Studies in Composition, edited by E. Barton and G. Stygall. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 2006. “Research on the Role of Classroom Discourse as It Affects Reading Comprehension.” Research in the Teaching of English 40 (4): 392–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., and A. Gamoran. 1991. “Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement.” Research in the Teaching of English 25 (3): 261–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., A. Gamoran, R. Kachur, and C. Prendergast. 1997. Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language Learning and Teaching in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., L. L. Wu, A. Gamoran, S. Zeiser, and D. A. Long. 2003. “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes 35 (2): 135–198. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A. 2012. “Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Language Use during Literature Discussions.” The Reading Teacher 65 (7): 446–456.10.1002/TRTR.01066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., L. Kuo, A. Clark, B. Miller, M. Jadallah, R. Anderson, and M. Nguyen-Jahiel. 2009. “Collaborative Reasoning: A Dialogic Approach to Group Discussions.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1080/03057640802701952.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. 1995. Literature as Exploration. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Sachar, L. 1998. Holes. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, R., and O. Tietje. 2001. Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Short, K., J. Harste, and C. Burke. 1996. Creating Classrooms for Authors and Inquirers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Short, K., G. Kaufman, S. Kaser, L. H. Kahn, and K. M. Crawford. 1999. “‘Teacher-Watching’: Examining Teacher Talk in Literature Circles.” Language Arts 76 (5): 377–385.
   Google Scholar
• Soter, Anna O., Ian A. Wilkinson, P. Karen Murphy, Lucila Rudge, Kristin Reninger, and Margaret Edwards. 2008. “What the Discourse Tells Us: Talk and Indicators of High-Level Comprehension.” International Journal of Educational Research 47 (6): 372–391. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli, J. 1992. Maniac Magee. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., M. Pressley, and D. Pearson. 2000. Effective Teachers and Schools: Trends across Recent Studies (ED 450353). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. S. 1991. A Study of Wondering Discourse in Three Literature Class Discussions (Order No. 9128380). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (303935754).
   Google Scholar
• Van den Branden, K. 2000. “Does Negotiation of Meaning Promote Reading Comprehension? A Study of Multilingual Primary School Classes.” Reading Research Quarterly 35 (3): 426–443.10.1598/RRQ.35.3.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory in Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605895
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., and R. M. Arauz. 2006. “Dialogue in the Classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (3): 379–428.10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., A. O. Soter, and P. K. Murphy. 2010. “Developing of a Model of Quality Talk about Literary Text.” In Bringing Reading Research to Life, edited by M. G. McKeown and L. Kucan, 142–169. New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar