‘Don’t bother with that’: the use of negative imperative directives for defusing student conflict in a special support classroom

References

• Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, W. N., and Y. Mathes 1995. “Students with ADHD in the Inclusive Classroom: A Hierarchical Approach to Strategy Selection.” Intervention in School and Clinic 30 (4): 2226–2234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. 1988. “Educating Teachers about Managing Classrooms and Students.” Teaching and Teacher Education 4 (1): 1–18.10.1016/0742-051X(88)90020-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S. Levinton. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. H. 1999. “Smoothing the Rough Edges of Classroom Transitions.” Intervention in School and Clinic 34 (4): 224–235.10.1177/105345129903400406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M., and D. Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., and E. Holt. 1988. “Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints.” Social Problems 35: 398–417.10.2307/800594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J., and E. Kärkkäinen. 2012. “Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction.” Text and Talk 32 (4): 433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. 1980. “Conversational Mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 4 (4): 341–350.10.1016/0378-2166(80)90029-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freebody, P., and J. Freiberg. 2000. “Public and Pedagogic Morality: The Local Orders of Instructional and Regulatory Talk in Classrooms.” In Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological Studies of Knowledge in Action, edited by S. Hester and D. Francis, 141–162. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1967. “On Face Work.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior, edited by E. Goffman, 5–33. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, P., B. Glick, and J. Gibbs. 1998. Aggression Replacement Training: A Comprehensive Intervention for Aggressive Youth. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2003. “The Body in Action.” In Discourse, the Body and Identity, edited by J. Coupland and R. Gwyn, 19–42. Houndsmill: Palgrave/Macmillan.10.1057/9781403918543
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2006. “Retrospective and Prospective Orientation in the Construction of Argumentative Moves.” Text & Talk 26 (4–5): 443–461.10.1515/TEXT.2006.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., and C. Goodwin. 1987. “Children Arguing.” In Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, edited by S. Philips, S. Steele, and C. Tanz, 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621918
   Google Scholar
• Haddington, P. 2006. “The Organization of Gaze and Assessments as Resources for Stance Taking.” Text & Talk 26 (3): 281–328.10.1515/TEXT.2006.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, A. H. 2000. “The Grammatical and Interactional Organization of Teacher’s Directives: Implications for Socialization of Chinese American Children.” Linguistics and Education 11 (2): 119–140.10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00025-5
   Google Scholar
• Heap, J. L. 1985. “Discourse in the Production of Classroom Knowledge: Reading Lessons.” Curriculum Inquiry 15 (3): 245–279.10.1080/03626784.1985.11075966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, S., and D. Francis. 2000. “Ethnomethodology and Local Educational Order.” In Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological Studies of Knowledge in Action, edited by S. Hester and D. Francis, 1–20. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. 2000. “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace.” Discourse Studies 2 (2): 159–185.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R. 1996. “‘Save the Talk for after the Listening’: The Realisation of Regulative Discourse in Teacher Talk.” Language and Education 10 (2–3): 82–102.10.1080/09500789608666702
   Google Scholar
• Ispa, J. 1981. “Social Interactions among Teachers, Handicapped Children, and Nonhandicapped Children in a Mainstreamed Preschool.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 1 (4): 231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 1984. “Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgement Tokens “Yeah”; and “Mm Hm”.” Paper in Linguistics 17 (2): 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 1988. “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35: 418–441.10.2307/800595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. H. 1990. “Classroom Order as Practical Action: The Making and Un-making of a Quiet Reproach.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 11 (2): 189–214.10.1080/0142569900110205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manke, M. 1997. Classroom Power Relations: Understanding Student–Teacher Interaction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Margutti, P. 2011. “Teachers’ Reproaches and Managing Discipline in the Classroom: When Teachers Tell Students What They Do ‘Wrong’.” Linguistics and Education 22 (4): 310–329.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. 1985. “On the Functions of Social Conflict among Children.” American Sociological Review 50: 207–223.10.2307/2095410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L., and A. Hemmings. 2006. Classroom Authority. Theory, Research & Practice. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9 (2): 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psathas, G. 1995. Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rampton, B. 2006. Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schieffelin, B. 1986. “Teasing and Shaming in Kaluli Children’s Interactions.” In Language Socialization across Cultures, edited by B. Schiffelin and E. Ochs, 165–182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23.10.1017/S0047404500006837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainio, L. 2011. “Gendered Address Terms in Reproach Sequences in Classroom Interaction.” Linguistics and Education 22: 330–347.10.1016/j.linged.2010.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. 2006. “Intertextuality in Interaction: Reframing Family Arguments in Public and Private.” Text & Talk 26 (4–5): 597–617.10.1515/TEXT.2006.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z., and B. Hruska. 2011. “Getting and Keeping Nora on Board: A Novice Elementary ESOL Student Teacher’s Practices for Lesson Engagement.” Linguistics and Education 22 (4): 441–455.10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.009
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z., E. Reddington, and N. Tadic. 2016. “Responding Artfully to Student-initiated Departures in the Adult ESL Classroom.” Linguistics and Education 33: 28–39.10.1016/j.linged.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar