Facilitating sustainable behavior through urban infrastructures: learning from Singapore?

References

• Abelson J, Gauvin F. 2006. Assessing the impacts of public participation: concepts, evidence and policy implications. Research Report P.06, Public Involvement Network, Canadian Policy Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich M. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker WE, Law J, editors. Shaping technology/ building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein S. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners. 35.4:216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber B. 2003. Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age (20th anniversary ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop R, Phillips J, Yeo W. 2004. Beyond description: Singapore space historicity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell P, Petrescu D, Till J. 2005. Architecture and participation. Abingdon: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Brand R. 2005a. Synchronizing science and technology with human behavior. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Brand R. 2005b. Urban infrastructures and sustainable social practices. J Urban Tech. 12(2):1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand R. 2008. Co-evolution of technical and social change in action: Hasselt’s approach to urban mobility. Built Environ. 34(2):182–199.
   Google Scholar
• Broome J. 2005. Mass housing cannot be sustained. In: Blundell P, Petrescu D, Till J, editors. Architecture and participation. Abingdon: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Building and Construction Authority. 2008. BCA Green Mark Scheme, Building and Construction Authority. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/green_mark_buildings.html
   Google Scholar
• Building and Construction Standards Committee. 2006. SS 530: 2006 – Code of practice for energy efficiency standard for building services and equipment, Building and Construction Standards Committee. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://www.singaporestandardseshop.sg/product/ProductView.aspx?id=988fd2a3-c71d-4c97-b9e0-7c61fb512415
   Google Scholar
• Bull R, Petts J, Evans J. 2008. Social learning from public engagement: dreaming the impossible? J Environ Plann Manage. 51.5:701–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnell T, Muzaini H, Sidaway JD. 2006. Global city frontiers: Singapore’s hinterland and the contested socio-political geographies of Bintan, Indonesia. Int J Urban Reg Res. 30(1):3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TC. 2000. Renaissance revisited: Singapore as a ‘Global City for the Arts’. Int J Urban Reg Res. 24(4):818–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chess C, Purcell K. 1999. Public participation and the environment: do we know what works? Environ Sci Tech. 33.16:2685–2692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper B, Pickering M. 2008. Dialogues in widening participation. Transformative dialogues. Teach Lear J. 1(3):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• da Cunha D, editor. 2002. Singapore in the new millennium: challenges facing the city-state. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Day C. 2003. Consensus design – socially inclusive process. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek JS. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq. 12(2):219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R, Bransford J, editors. Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson W. 1993. Disneyland with the death penalty. Wired 1.4. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.04/gibson.html
   Google Scholar
• Goh RBH. 2005. The Internet and Christianity in Asia – cultural trends, structures and transformations. Int J Urban Reg Res. 29(4):831–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy S, Shove E. 2000. A sociology of energy. Buildings and the environment: constructing knowledge, designing practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas J. 1984. The theory of communicative action: reason and rationalisation of society. vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding M. 2003. Singapore – the policeman inside. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://wherethehellismatt.typepad.com/blog/2003/04/singapore_the_p.html
   Google Scholar
• Hassan H. 2006. Statement at the fourteenth session of the commission on sustainable development. Press Release ENV/DEV/898. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/envdev898.doc.htm
   Google Scholar
• Healey P. 1997. Collaborative planning – shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hee L, Ooi GL. 2003. The politics of public space planning in Singapore. Plann Perspect. 18(1):79–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogma R, Kemp R, Schot J, Truffer B. 2002. Experimenting for sustainable transport – the approach of strategic niche management. London: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Huat CB. 1999. Global economy/immature polity: current crisis in Southeast Asia. Int J Urban Reg Res. 23(4):782–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Involve. 2005. People and participation – how to put citizens at the heart of decision making. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.wilsonielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/people-and-participation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kemp R, Rotmans J. 2005. The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems. In: Weber M, Hemmelskamp J, editors. Towards environmental innovation systems. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ker LT. 1983. Reprint of original from 1981. Images of man-made environment. In: Saw SH, Bhanthal RS, editos. Singapore towards the year 2000. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kernohan D, Daish J, Gray J, Joiner D. 1992. User participation in building design and management. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Keung J. 1998. Planning for sustainable urban development – The Singapore approach. In: Yuen B, editor. Planning Singapore – from plan to implementation. Singapore: Singapore Institute of Planners.
   Google Scholar
• Kleemeier K. 2000. The impact of participation on sustainability: an analysis of the Malawi Rural Piped Scheme Program. World Dev. 28(5):929–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesnikov-Jessop S. 2007. Singapore housing agency tries a greener look. New York Times, May 31. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2007/05/30/business/worldbusiness/30iht-bgspore.1.5929907.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Koolhaas R. 1995. Singapore: portrait of a Potemkin metropolis; Songlines … or thirty years of tabula rasa. In: Sigler J, Office for Metropolitan Architecture, Koolhaas R, Mau B, editors. Small, medium, large, extra-large. Rotterdam: O10 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. 2000. The Berlin key or how to do words with things. In: Graves-Brown PM, editor. Matter, materiality and modern culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod G. 2002. From urban entrepreneurialism to a ‘revanchist city’? On the spatial injustices of Glasgow’s renaissance. Antipode. 34(3):602–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah BT, Yaacob I, Singapore Inter-Ministerial Committee on Sustainable Development, Singapore Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, Singapore Ministry of National Development. 2009. A lively and liveable Singapore – strategies for sustainable growth. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://app.mewr.gov.sg/web/Contents/ContentsSSS.aspx?ContId=1299
   Google Scholar
• Marshall N, Roberts R. 1997. That thing called public involvement. Plan Canada. 37(2):3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mccoy P. (2001) Singapore ranked 8th for eco-friendly performance. The Straits Times 22 January. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Issue/straitstimes20010122.aspx
   Google Scholar
• [MEWR] Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources. 2006. Clean land – solid waste management. Available from: http://app.mewr.gov.sg/home.asp?cid=166&nid=166&id=SAS762
   Google Scholar
• [MEWR] Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources. 2007. Key environmental statistics 2007. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Mar 11]. Available from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN026593.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MND. 1994. The MND network – shaping the future. Singapore: Ministry of National Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mo F. 2007. Expenditure Overview – Ministry of Environment and Water Resources. Ministry of Finance. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://www.mof.gov.sg/budget_2007/expenditure_overview/mewr.html
   Google Scholar
• Moore SA. 2007. Alternative routes to the sustainable city – Austin, Curitiba, and Frankfurt. Lanham (MD): Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• [NEA] National Environment Agency. 2004. Waste minimisation and recycling programmes. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://app2.nea.gov.sg/topics_recyclingprog.aspx
   Google Scholar
• [NEA] National Environment Agency. 2005. Semakau landfill opens for nature-based activities. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Mar 11]. Available from: http://app2.nea.gov.sg/news_detail_2005.aspx?news_sid=20081014375833105888
   Google Scholar
• [NEA] National Environment Agency. 2007. Green vehicle rebate. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Mar 11]. Available from: http://app2.nea.gov.sg/topics_gvr.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2004. Community involvement in planning: the government’s objectives. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
   Google Scholar
• Olds K, Wai-Chung YH. 2005. Pathways to global city formation: a view from the developmental city-state of Singapore. In: Brenner N, Keil R, editors. The global cities reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ong SE. 2005. 3R portfolio – good practices to promote the 3Rs. National Environment Agency, Resource Conservation Department. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/3r/en/info/05_13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ow CH. 1984. Singapore: past, present and future. In: You PS, Lim CY, editors. Singapore: twenty years of development. Singapore: Nan Yang Xing Zhou Lianhe Zaobabo.
   Google Scholar
• Owens S. 2000. Engaging the public: information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environ Plann A. 32:1141–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts J. 2000. Evaluating methods for public participation – literature review. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Petts J. 2001. Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberative processes: waste management case-studies. J Environ Plann Manage. 44(2):207–226.
   Google Scholar
• Popper K. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pratchett L. 1999. New fashions in public participation: towards greater democracy? Parliament Aff. 52.4:616–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Utility Board. 2006. Water efficient homes. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.pub.gov.sg/conserve/Households/Pages/WaterEfficientHomesProgram.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ravetz J. 1999. Citizen participation for integrated assessment: new pathways in complex systems. Int J Environ Pollut. 11(3):331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed M. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv. 141(10):2417–2431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J. 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol Econ. 48(4):369–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohracher H, Ornetzeder M. 2002. Green buildings in context: improving social learning processes between users and producers. Built Environ. 28(1):73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Schein EH. 1996. Strategic pragmatism: the culture of Singapore’s economic development board. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schot J. 2002. Towards new forms of participatory technology development. In: Jamison A, Rohracher H, editors. Technology studies and sustainable development. Munich and Vienna: Profil.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar SM. 2007. Let’s learn lesson from Singapore. The Kathmandu Post 7 July. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://wacblogger.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/artciles_matrix_2007.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Bus Service. 2008. Average daily ridership. Singapore Bus Service. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available 1285 from: www.sbstransit.com.sg./generalinfo/operational.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Department of Statistics. 2010. Press Release: Census of population 2010. Statistical release 1 on demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/news/news/press12012011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Government. 2004. Survey for Reporting on National Sustainable Development Strategies. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/singapor/nsds.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Mass Rapid Transit. 2008a. Monthly total bus ridership. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.smrt.com.sg/AboutSMRT/InvestorRelations/KeyOperatingMatrix/Buses.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Mass Rapid Transit. 2008b. Monthly total MRT ridership. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.smrt.com.sg/AboutSMRT/InvestorRelations/KeyOperatingMatrix/Trains.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Southerton, D, Chappells H, van Vliet B, editors. 2004. Sustainable consumption: the implications of changing infrastructures of provision. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Tan SH. 2003. Confucian democracy – a Deweyan reconstruction. Albany (NY): State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teo P, Yeoh BSA, Ong SN. 2008. Surveillance in a globalizing city: Singapore’s battle against SARS. In: Harris Ali S, Keil R, editors. Networked disease: emerging infections in the global city. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2008. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Till J. 2005. The negotiation of hope. In: Blundell-Jones P, Petrescu D, Till J, editors. Architecture and participation. Abingdon: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Till J. 2006. The architect and the other. openDemocracy, 25 June 2006. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: http://www.opendemocracy.net/ecology-landscape/architecture_3680.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Trocki CA. 2006. Singapore: wealth, power and the culture of control. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui-Auch LS. 2002. Regional production relationships and developmental impacts: a comparative study of three production networks. Int J Urban Reg Res. 23(2):329–344.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. 1992. Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. New York: United Nations Dept. of Public Information.
   Google Scholar
• [URA] Urban Redevelopment Authority, ed. 2004. Stay pro-business to stay ‘in business’: new URA chief. In Skyline – ‘Planning for Sustainability’. March/April, 2–3. [cited 2013 March 19]. Available from: www.ura.gov.sg/skyline/skyline04/skyline04-02/text/p2.html
   Google Scholar
• Wilson D. 1999. Exploring the limits of public participation in local government. Parliament Aff. 52(2):246–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woon KK. no date. Statement in a discussion with Mok Wei Wei and Leo van Schaik. Printed on a plaque inside the URA gallery. Transcribed by the author on-site on 17 September 2006.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Operations Evaluation Department. 2005. The effectiveness of World Bank support for community-based and -driven development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yang PP-J. 2005. From central business district to new downton: designing future sustainable urban forms in Singapore. In: Jenks M, Dempsey N, editors. Future forms and design for sustainable cities. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung HW. 1999. The internationalization of ethnic Chinese business firms from Southeast Asia: strategies, processes and competitive advantage. Int J Urban Reg Res. 23(1):88–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen B. 1998. Singapore – the planned city-state. In: Yuen B, editor. Planning Singapore – from plan to implementation. Singapore: Singapore Institute of Planners.
   Google Scholar