An unbalanced model for sustainable urban development

References

• Batty M. 2008. The size, scale and shape of cities. Science. 319:769–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund C, Hage O, Söderholm P. 2010. Household recycling and the influence of norms and convenience. In: Söderholm P, editor. Environmental policy and household behaviour: sustainability and everyday life. London: Earthscan; p. 193–210.
   Google Scholar
• Breheny M. 1997. Urban compaction: feasible and acceptable? Cities. 14:209–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S. 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradiction of sustainable development. J Am Plan Assoc. 62: 296–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley M, Christie I. 2000. Managing sustainable development. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Kanyamma A, Linden A-L. 2007. Energy efficiency in residences – challenges for women and men in the North. Energy Policy. 35:2163–2172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter N. 2001. The politics of the environment, ideas, activism, policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities 2009. On the application and effectiveness of the directives on strategic environmental assessment. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Feng H, Yu L, Solecki W. 2005. Urban dimensions of environmental change. Manmouth (NJ): Science Press USA Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann J, Alonso W, editors. 1975. Regional policy. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fundingsland TM, Hanusch M. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art. Imp Assess Proj. 30:15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guijt I, Moiseev A. 2001. IUCN resource kit for sustainability assessment. Gland: The World conservation Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gyberg P. 2003. Energi som kunskapsområde. Om praktik och diskurser i skolan [Energy as an area knowledge. On practice and discourses in schools] [PhD thesis]. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Technology and Social Change.
   Google Scholar
• Hall MC. 1999. Rethinking collaboration and partnership: a public policy perspective. J Sustain Tourism. 7:274–289.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton G. 1997. Developing sustainable urban development models. Cities. 14:189–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey P. 1997. Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: MacMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen E, Johnson M, Robinson S, Vadovics E, Saastamoinen M. 2010. Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change. Energy Policy. 38:7586–7595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO. 1958. The strategy of economic development. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Ministry of Environment & Forests. 2002. Ecocities in making, report by the central pollution control board. Delhi: Ministry of Environments & Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Innes JE, Booher DE 2010. Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson T. 2005. Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscane.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson T, Papathanasopoulou E. 2008. Luxary or “lock-in”? An exploration of unsustainable consumption in the UK: 1968–2000. Ecol Econ. 68:80–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks M, Burgess R. 2000. Compact cities: sustainable urban form for developing countries. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks M, Jones J. 2010. Dimensions of the sustainable city. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan A. 2008. The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forward. Environ Plan C. 26:17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan A, Lenschow A, editors. 2008. Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kain J-H. 2000. Urban support systems: social and technical, socio-technical or sociotechnical? Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology, School of Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp RL, Stephani CJ. 2011. Cities going green: a handbook of best practice. Jefferson (NC): McFarland & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty W, Meadowcroft J, editors. 2000. Implementing sustainable development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis AW. 1954. The theory of economic growth. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Loukola M-L, Isoaho S, Lindström K. 2001. Education for sustainable development in Finland. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Massey D. 2005. For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• May AD, Kelly C, Shepherd S. 2006. The principles of integration in urban transport strategies. Trans Policy. 13:319–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molotch H. 1976. The city as a growth machine: towards a political economy of space. Am J Socio. 82:309–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris D. 2008. Self-reliant cities: energy and the transformation of Urban America. Washington (DC): Institute of Local Self-Reliance.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal G. 1957. Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal G. 1968. Asian drama. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Newman P, Jennings I. 2009. Cities as sustainable ecosystems: principles and practices. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Development and Co-operation 2004. Key environmental indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Co-operation.
   Google Scholar
• Peters BG, Pierre J, editors. 2007. Handbook of public administration. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rees WE. 2004. The ecological footprints of cities: urban sustainability and vulnerability in the 21st Century. Paper presented at: Final Workshop of the US-Japan Urban Ecosystem Initiative, New York, Nov 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhead J, Mongers J, editors. 2001. Rational analysis in a problematic world revisited. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ruth M, Coelho D. 2007. Understanding and managing the complexity of urban systems under climate change. Clim Policy. 7:317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets E, Weterings R. 1999. Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg J. 2001. Bridging gaps: sustainable development and local democratic processes [masters thesis]. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology, School of Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Söderholm K. 2010. Policy-driven socio-technical structures and Swedish households’ consumption of housing and transport since the 1950s. In: Söderholm P, editor. Environmental policy and household behaviour: sustainability and everyday life. London: Earthscan; p. 149–172.
   Google Scholar
• Söderholm P, editor. 2010. Environmental policy and household behaviour: sustainability and everyday life. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Valentin A, Spangenberg J. 1999. Indicators for sustainable communities. Paper presented at: International Workshop on Assessment Methodologies for Urban Infrastructures, Stockholm, Nov 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel M, Rees WE. 1996. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Werquin AC, Duham G, Lindholm G, Oppermann B, Pauleit S, Tjallingii S, editors. 2005. Green structure and urban planning. Final report of COST action CI, cost programme. Brussels: COST Office.
   Google Scholar
• Williams K, Dair C, Lindsay M. 2010. Neighbourhood design and sustainable lifestyles. In: Jenks M, Jones J, editors. Dimensions of the sustainable city. Berlin: Springer; p. 183–214.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L, Yang Z, Li W. 2008. Modelling the carrying capacity of the urban eco-system. Paper presented at: 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, May 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zuindeau B. 2006. Spatial approach to sustainable development: challenges of equity and efficiency. Reg Stud. 40:459–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar