References
- Ali AK. 2007. Understanding local planning agency power in Florida. J Archit Plann Res. 24:325–337.
- American Planning Association. 2012. Policy Guide on Smart Growth. Available from: http://www.planning.org/policy/guides/adopted/smartgrowth.htm?print=true
- Baldassare M, Wilson G. 1996. Changing sources of suburban support for local growth controls. Urban Stud. 33:459–472.
- Berke PR, French SP. 1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. J Plann Educ Res. 13:237–250.
- Boarnet MG, McLaughlin RB, Carruthers JI. 2011. Does state growth management change the pattern of urban growth? Evidence from Florida. Reg Sci Urban Econ. 41:236–252.
- Brody SD, Carrasco V, Highfield WE. 2006. Measuring the adoption of local sprawl reduction planning policies in Florida. J Plann Educ Res. 25:294–310.
- Burby RJ, May PJ, Berke PR, Dalton LC, French SP, Kaiser EJ. 1997. Making governments plan: state experiments in managing land use. Baltimore (USA): Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Carruthers J. 2002. The impacts of state growth management programmes: a comparative analysis. Urban Stud. 39:1959–1982.
- Chapin T, Connerly C. 2004. Attitudes towards growth management in Florida: comparing resident support in 1985 and 2001. J Am Plann Assoc. 70:443–452.
- City of Cumberland. 2004. Comprehensive Plan.
- Cohen JR. 2002. Maryland’s smart growth: using incentives to combat sprawl. In: Squires G, editor. Urban sprawl: causes, consequences and policy responses. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
- Dalton L, Burby R. 1994. Mandates, plans, and planners: building local commitment to development management. J Am Plann Assoc. 60:444–461.
- Downs A. 2005. Smart growth: why we discuss it more than we do it. J Am Plann Assoc. 71:367–378.
- Edwards M, Haines A. 2007. Evaluating smart growth: implications for small communities. J Plann Educ Res. 27:49–64.
- Hawkins CV. 2011. Smart growth policy choice: a resource dependency and local governance explanation. Policy Stud J. 39:679–707.
- Hirt S. 2007. The mixed use trend: planning attitudes and practices in Northeast Ohio. J Archit Plann Res. 24:224–244.
- Knaap G. 2005. A requiem for smart growth? In: Mandelker D, editor. Planning reform in the new century. Chicago (USA): Planners Press.
- Litman T. 2012. Smart growth reforms changing planning, regulatory and fiscal practices to support more efficient land use. Victoria (Canada): Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available from: http://www.vtpi.org/smart_growth_reforms.pdf
- Lynch L, Lovell SJ. 2003. Combining spatial and survey data to explain participation in agricultural land reservation programs. Land Econ. 79:259–276.
- Maryland Annotated Code Article 66 B Land Use.
- Nguyen M. 2009. Why do communities mobilize against growth: growth pressures, community status, metropolitan hierarchy, or strategic interaction? J Urban Aff. 31:25–43.
- Norton R. 2008. Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes. Land Use Policy. 25:432–454.
- O’Connell L. 2009. The impact of local supporters on smart growth policy adoption. J Am Plann Assoc. 75:281–291.
- Schneider M, Kim D. 1996. The effects of local conditions on economic growth, 1977–1990: the changing location of high-technology activities. Urban Aff Rev. 32:131–156.
- Wassmer R. 2001. An economist’s perspective on urban sprawl influences of the “Fiscalization of Land Use” and urban-growth boundaries. Sacramento (USA): Senate Publications.
- Wassmer R, Lascher E. 2006. Who supports local growth and regional planning to deal with its consequences? Urban Aff Rev. 41:621–645.
- Yin M, Sun J. 2007. The impacts of state growth management programs on urban sprawl in the 1990s. J Urban Aff. 29:149–179.