744
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The Great Divide: exploring the divergence between urban metabolism in theory and practice in water supply system in Bengaluru

Pages 1-20 | Received 07 Aug 2015, Accepted 11 May 2016, Published online: 28 Jul 2016

References

  • Ahluwalia MS. 2002. Economic reforms in India since 1991: has gradualism worked? J Econ Perspect. 16:67–88.
  • Bai X. 2007. Integrating global environmental concerns into urban management: the scale and readiness arguments. J Ind Ecol. 11:15–29.
  • Bakker KJ. 2003. A political ecology of water privatization. Stud Polit Econ. 70:35–58.
  • BDA CDP. [cited 2015 Oct 8]. Available from: http://www.bdabangalore.org/brochure.pdf
  • [BWSSB] Bangalore Water Supply and Sewage Board. 2013. Information on valley system and water from different stages; [cited 2014 Mar 10]. Available from: http://bwssb.org/sewerage-system/& http://bwssb.org/mission-history/
  • Banerjee-Guha S. 2009. Neoliberalising the ‘Urban’: new geographies of power and injustice in Indian cities. EPW. 44:95–107.
  • Batra L. 2009. A review of urbanisation and urban policy in post-independent India. Working Paper Series. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University; p. 5–30
  • Basant R. 2006. Bangalore cluster: evolution, growth and challenges. IIMA Working Papers. Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management.
  • Benjamin S. 2000. Governance, economic settings and poverty in Bangalore. Environ Urban. 12:35–56.
  • Bhatnagar S. 2006. India’s software industry. In: Chandra V, editor. technology, adaptation, and exports: how some developing countries got it right. Washington (DC): World Bank; p. 95–124.
  • [CGWB] Central Ground Water Board. 2013. Ground water booklet: Bangalore urban district: a report for Ministry of Water Resources. Bangalore: CGWB.
  • Census of India. 1971. Primary census abstract- general population. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
  • Chaudhary A. 2011. Changing structure of Indian textiles industry after MFA (multi fiber agreement) phase out: a global perspective. Far J Psychol Business. 2:22.
  • Chacko E. 2007. From brain drain to brain gain: reverse migration to Bangalore and Hyderabad, India’s globalizing high tech cities. Geo J. 68:131–140.
  • Chrysoulakis N, Lopes M, San José R, Grimmond CSB, Jones MB, Magliulo V, Klostermann JEM, Synnefa A, Mitraka Z, Castro EA, et al. 2013. Sustainable urban metabolism as a link between bio-physical sciences and urban planning: the BRIDGE project. Landsc Urban Plan. 112:100–117.
  • Cronon W. 1992. Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. New York: WW Norton & Company.
  • Das B. 1981. Urban planning in India. Soc Scientist. 9:53–67.
  • Dinares M. 2014. Urban metabolism: a review of recent literature on the subject. Documents d’Analisi Geographica. 60:551–571.
  • Dittrich C. 2007. Bangalore: globalisation and fragmentation in India’s high tech-capital. Asien. 103:45–58.
  • Domene E. 2014. Changing patterns of water consumption in the suburban Barcelona: lifestiles and welfare as explanatory factors. Investigaciones Geographicas, enero junu de. 61:39–53.
  • Doshi S. 2015. Rethinking gentrification in India: displacement, dispossession and the specter of development. In: Lees L, Shin HB, Lopez-Morales E, editors. Global gentrifications: uneven development and displacement. Bristol: Policy Press; p. 101–120.
  • Dossal M. 1989. Limits of colonial urban planning: a study of mid‐nineteenth century Bombay. Int J Urban Reg Res. 13:19–31.
  • Dossal M. 2005. A master plan for the city: looking at the past. EPW. 40:3897–3900.
  • Doyle P, Bennett MR, editors. 2002. Terrain in military history: an introduction. In: Fields of battle: terrain in military history. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media; p. 1–7.
  • D’Souza R, Nagendra H. 2011. Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: the Agara lake in Bangalore, India. Environ Manage. 47:840–850.
  • Drakakis-Smith DW. 2000. Third world cities. London: Routledge.
  • EMPRI. 2008. Environmental database for Peenya industrial area: complimentary project report. Bangalore: Environmental Management and Policy Research Institute.
  • Freestone R. 2000. Urban planning in a changing world: the twentieth century experience. London: Taylor & Francis; p. 8.
  • Gandy M. 2004. Rethinking urban metabolism. City. 8:363–379. Carfax publishing.
  • Gandy M. 2006. Urban nature and the ecological imaginary. In: Heynen N, Kaika M, Swyngedouw E, editors. In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Routledge; p. 62–72.
  • Gleik. PH. 1994. Water and energy. Annu Rev Energy Environ. 19:267–299.
  • Gopakumar G, editor. 2012. Studying water reform in India. In: Transforming urban water supplies in India: the role of reform and partnerships in globalization. London: Routledge; p. 9–10.
  • Fazlul HM. 1970. Bangalore through the Centuries, Vol. 11. Historical Publications; p. 124.
  • Hall P. 2014. Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design since 1880. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; p. 151–201.
  • Hebbert M. 1999. A city in good shape: town planning and public health. Town Plann Rev. 70:433.
  • Heitzman J. 1999. corporate strategy and planning in the science city: Bangalore as’ silicon valley. EPW. 34:2–11.
  • Heitzman J. 2004. Network city: planning the information society in Bangalore. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Hettne B. 1978. The political economy of indirect rule: Mysore 1881-1947. New Delhi: Ambika publications. Part III, Industrialize or Perish: Growth of a development strategy; 312.
  • Heynen N, Kaika M, Swyngedouw E. 2006. Urban political ecology: politicizing the production of urban natures. In: Heynen N, Kaika M, Swyngedouw E, editors. In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Routledge; p. 1–15.
  • Hoque SF. 2012. Urban water sector reforms in india: financing infrastructure development through market–based financing and private–public partnerships. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper No. LKYSPP, 12-05, Singapore.
  • iDeck. 2010 Jun. Study of development potential around Bangalore International Airport. Bangalore: Report submitted to Infrastructure Development Department.
  • [ITPB] International Tech Park Bangalore. [cited 2016 Feb 14]. Available from: http://www.itpbangalore.com/about_history.html
  • Jamwal N. 2012. Mumbai under floods: a natural disaster or manifestation of an underlying conflict in Mumbai City’s skewed urban planning. In: Prasad Eklavya KJ, Joy SP, Vispute S, editors. Agony of floods: flood induced water conflicts in India. Pune: Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India; p. 90–100.
  • Kahrl F, Holst DR. 2008. China’s water energy Nexus. Water Policy. 10:1–16.
  • Karmakar J. 2015. Retrospect of post-colonial metropolitan planning in India: critical appraisal. JGRP. 8:166–173.
  • Keivani R, Mattingly M. 2007. The interface of globalization and peripheral land in the cities of the south: implications for urban governance and local economic development. Int J Urban Reg Res. 31:459–474.
  • Kennedy C, Pincetl S, Bunje P. 2010. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design, Environ Pollut. 30:1–9.
  • King AD. 1989. Colonialism, urbanism and the capitalist world economy. Int J Urban Reg Res. 13:1–18.
  • [KUIDFC] Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation. [cited 2015 May 16]. Available from: http://www.uddkar.gov.in/KUIDFC
  • Lele S, Srinivasan V, Jamwal P, Thomas BK, Eswar M, Zuhail TM. 2013. Water management in Arkavathy basin: a situation analysis. Environment and Development. Discussion Paper No.1. Bengaluru: Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment.
  • Madon S. 1997. Information-based global economy and socioeconomic development: the case of Bangalore. Inf Society Int J. 13:227–244.
  • Mahadevia D. 2004. Sustainable urban development in India: an inclusive perspective. In: Westendorff D, editor. Unsustainable to inclusive cities. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development; p. 57–85.
  • Mehta VK, Shekar M, Malghan D. 2013. Groundwater impacts of water consumption patterns in Bengaluru, India. JGWR. 2, Published by AGGS, India:143–154.
  • Mohan Kumar MS, Manohar U, D’Souza CD, Jamwal P, Sekhar M. 2011. Urban water supply and management: a case study of Bangalore city, India. In: Das S, editor. Bengaluru-Water Problems of the Fastest Growing City of India. Bangalore: Geological Society of India; p. 50–76.
  • Mukherjee J. 2015. Beyond the urban: rethinking urban ecology using Kolkata as a case study. IJUSD. 7:131–146.
  • Nair J. 2005. The promise of the metropolis: Bangalore’s twentieth century. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Nilekani N, 2014 Blog. [cited 2015 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.nandannilekani.in/en/blog/26-managing-the-water-crisis-in-bengaluru
  • Narayana MR. 2008. Globalization and urban growth: evidence for Bangalore (India). CIRJE F-544, CIRJE. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.
  • Narayana Swamy K. 1977. Water to Bangalore. Bangalore: Maruthi Prakashana publications; p. 6–7.
  • Pani N, Radhakrishna S, Bhat GK. 2010. Bengaluru, Bangalore, Bengaluru: imaginations and their times. Bangalore: Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
  • Pani N, Nikky S. 2012. Women at the threshold of globalization. New Delhi: Routledge; ISBN: 978-0-415-52298-4, p. 1–15.
  • Parthasarathy B. 2004. India’s silicon valley or silicon valley’s India? Socially embedding the computer software industry in Bangalore. Int J Urban Reg Res. 28:664–685.
  • Pincetl S, Bunje P, Holmes T. 2012. An expanded urban metabolism method: toward a systems approach for assessing urban energy processes and causes. Landsc Urban Plan. 107:193–202.
  • Prakasa Rao VLS, Tewari VK 1986. Ecological structure of Bangalore city. In: Tewari VK, Weinstein JA, Prakasa Rao VL S, editors. Indian cities ecological perspectives. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi; p. 221–222.
  • Saritha R. 2005. Dec 26. Indians find they can go home Aagain. The New York Times, Business Day.
  • Ramachandran R. 1989. Urbanisation and urban systems in India. Oxford: University Press; p. 323–340.
  • Ranganathan M, Kamath L, Baindur V. 2009. Piped water supply to greater Bangalore: putting the cart before the horse? EPW. 44:53–62.
  • Rao C.H. editor. 1930. Mysore Gazetteer, Vol. 5. Bangalore: The Government Press; p. 114–130.
  • Rao N. 2008. Cities in transition: growth, change and governance in six metropolitan areas. London: Routledge; p. 125.
  • Rao V, Venkatachalm A, Joshi HG. 2012. Challenges faced by women entrepreneurs running micro, small and medium scale fashion and apparel business: a study on fashion and apparel enterprises in coastal Karnataka. International Conference on Trade, Tourism and Management (ICTTM’2012); Dec 21–22, Bangkok (Thailand).
  • Rapoport E. 2011. Interdisciplinary perspective on urban metabolism: a review of the literature. UCL Environmental Institute working paper. London: Development Planning Unit, UCL.
  • Ravindra A. 1995. Metropolitan Bangalore: a management perspective. Kolkata: Times Research Foundation.
  • Roy Chowdhury S. 2007. Informality in globalised forms of production. TIJLE. 50:765–774.
  • Sastry GS. 2008. emerging development issues of greater Bangalore. ISEC working paper.
  • Shaw A. 1996. Urban policy in post-independent India: an appraisal. EPW. 31:224–228.
  • Shaw A. 2005. Peri-urban interface of Indian cities: growth, governance and local initiatives. EPW. 40:129–136.
  • Shivaramakrishnan KC. 2014. Governance of megacities: fractured thinking, fragmented setup. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Shrestha E. 2010. Evaluating the energy and carbon footprint of water conveyance system and future water supply options for Las Vegas, Nevada [PhD thesis]. Las Vegas: University of Nevada
  • Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Subrahmanya MH. 2007. Bangalore. Cities. 24:379–390.
  • Smith N. 1984. Uneven development: nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens: The University of Georgia Press; p. 198–199.
  • Swyngedouw E. 2006. Metabolic urbanisation: the making of the cyborg cities. In: Heynen N, Kaika M, Swyngedouw E, editors. In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Routledge; p. 20–39.
  • Tewari M. 2005. Post-MFA adjustments in India’s textile and apparel industry: emerging issues and trends. ICRIER, WP 167.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.