Modeling teleconnected urban social–ecological systems: opportunities and challenges for resilience research

References

• Adger WN, Eakin H, Winkels A. 2009. Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Front Ecol Environ. 7:150–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen PM. 1997. Cities and regions as self-organizing systems: models of complexity. London: Gordon and Beech Scientific Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bair J, editor. 2009. Frontiers of commodity chain research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batty M. 2007. Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batty M, Longley P. 1994. Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. London: Acad. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry BJL. 1964. Cities as systems within systems of cities. Pap Regional Sci Assoc. 13:146–163.
   Google Scholar
• Berry BJL, Garrison WL. 1958a. Recent developments of central place theory. Pap Regional Sci. 4:107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Berry BJL, Garrison WL. 1958b. Alternative explanations of urban rank-size relationships. Ann Assoc Am Geographers. 48:83–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry BJL, Okulicz-Kozaryn A. 2012. The city size distribution debate: resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas. Cities. 29:S17–S23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt LMA, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kuhnert C, West GB. 2007. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 104:7301–7306.
   Google Scholar
• Blaut JM. 1977. Two views of diffusion. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 67:343–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock W. 1999. Scaling in economics: a reader’s guide. Ind Corp Change. 8:409–446.
   Google Scholar
• Castells M. 2010. The rise of the network society. 2nd ed. with a new pref. Chichester, West Sussex. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo O, Gereffi G, Staritz C, editors. 2010. Global value chains in a postcrisis world: a development perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Available from: http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/978-0-8213-8499-2.
   Google Scholar
• Challies E, Newig J, Lenschow A. 2014. What role for social–ecological systems research in governing global teleconnections? Glob Environ Chang. 27:32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelleri L, Waters JJ, Olazabal M, Minucci G. 2015. Resilience trade-offs: addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience. Environ Urban. 27:181–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christaller W. 1933. Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland (The central places of southern Germany). Jena: Gustav Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff AD, Haggett P, Ord JK, Versey GR, editors. 1981. Spatial diffusion: an historical geography of epidemics in an island community. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decker EH, Elliott S, Smith FA, Blake DR, Rowland FS. 2000. Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annu Rev Energy Environ. 25:685–740.
   Google Scholar
• Dendrinos DS, Mullally H. 1985. Urban evolution: studies in the mathematical ecology of cities. Oxford [Oxfordshire] New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dicken P, Kelly PF, Olds K, Wai-Chung Yeung H. 2001. Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks. 1:89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas I. 1981. The city as an ecosystem. Prog Phys Geogr. 5:315–367.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn ES. 1980. The development of the U.S. urban system. Baltimore: Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durlauf SN. 2005. Complexity and empirical economics. Econ J. 115:F225–F243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin H, DeFries R, Kerr S, Lambin EF, Liu J, Marcotullio PJ, Zimmerer K. 2014. Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change. In: Seto KC, Reenberg A, editors. Rethinking global land use in an Urban Era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fragkias M, Langanke T, Boone CG, Haase D, Marcotullio PJ, Munroe D, Olah B, Reenberg A, Seto KC, Simon D. 2012. Land teleconnections in an urbanizing world – a workshop report. GLP Report No. 5; GLP-IPO, Copenhagen. UGEC Report No. 6; UGEC-IPO: Tempe. ISSN: 1904–5069
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann J. 1986. The world city hypothesis. Dev Change. 17:69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann J, Wolff G. 1982. World city formation: an agenda for research and action. Int J Urban Reg Res. 6:309–344.
   Google Scholar
• Friis C, Nielsen JØ, Otero I, Haberl H, Niewöhner J, Hostert P. 2016. From teleconnection to telecoupling: taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science. J Land Use Sci. 11:131–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi G. 1996. Global commodity chains: new forms of coordination and control among nations and firms in international industries. Competition and Change. 4:427–439.
   Google Scholar
• Getis A, Getis J. 1966. Christaller’s central place theory. J Geogr. 65:220–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golubiewski N. 2012. Is there a metabolism of an urban ecosystem? An ecological critique. Ambio. 41:751–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güneralp B, Seto KC, Ramachandran M. 2013. Evidence of urban land teleconnections and impacts on hinterlands. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 5:445–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand T. 1966. Aspects of the spatial structure of social communication and the diffusion of information. Pap Regional Sci. 16:27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Haggett P. 2000. The geographical structure of epidemics. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall P. 1966. The world cities. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Holling CS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 4:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy C, Cuddihy J, Engel-Yan J. 2007. The changing metabolism of cities. J Ind Ecol. 11:43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M, DeFries R, Dietz T, Fu F, Hertel TW, Izaurralde RC, Lambin EF, Li S, et al. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society. [cited 2016 Mar 27]; 18. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art26/
   Google Scholar
• Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M. 2016. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landsc Urban Plan. 147:38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers E. 2007. From central place to network model: theory and evidence of a paradigm change. Tijdschr Econ Soc Ge. 98:245–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF, Erb K-H, Hertel TW. 2013. Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 5:438–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal ZP. 2013. The connected city: how networks are shaping the modern metropolis. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45:167–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsch V. 2003. Does history matter for urban primacy? The case of Vienna. Reg Sci Urban Econ. 33:401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddison R, Hutton T, editors. 2015. Cities and economic change: restructuring and dislocation in the global metropolis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff HS, Dunn ES, Lampard EE, Muth RF. 1960. Regions, resources, and economic growth. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pflieger G, Rozenblat C. 2010. Introduction. Urban Networks Network Theory: City as Connector Multiple Networks. Urban Studies. 47:2723–2735.
   Google Scholar
• Pil F, Holweg M. 2006. Evolving from value chain to value grid. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 47:72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polese M. 2015. The resilient city: on the determinants of successful urban economies. In: Paddison R, Hutton T, editors. Cities and economic change: restructuring and dislocation in the global metropolis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Portugali J 2000. Self-organization and the city [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; [cited 2016 Mar 27]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04099-7.
   Google Scholar
• Pred AR. 1973. Urban growth and the circulation of information: the United States system of cities, 1790-1840. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qubbaj MR, Shutters ST, Muneepeerakul R. 2015. Living in a network of scaling cities and finite resources. Bull Math Biol. 77:390–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J. 2002. Global and world cities: a view from off the map. Int J Urban Reg Res. 26:531–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer PM. 1994. The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect. 8:3–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen S. 1994. Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen S. 2001. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. 2nd ed. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seto KC, Reenberg A, Boone CG, Fragkias M, Haase D, Langanke T, Marcotullio P, Munroe DK, Olah B, Simon D. 2012. Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 109:7687–7692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto KC-Y, Reenberg A, editors. 2014. Rethinking global land use in an urban era. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short JR, Kim Y, Kuus M, Wells H. 1996. The dirty little secret of world cities research: data problems in comparative analysis. Int J Urban Reg Res. 20:697–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon HA. 2000. Can there be a science of complex systems. In: Bar-Yam Y, editor. Proceedings from the international conference on complex systems on unifying themes in complex systems. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books; p. 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgeon T, Van Biesebroeck JGereffi G. 2008. Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry. Journal Of Economic Geography. 8:297–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabuchi T, Thisse J-F. 2011. A new economic geography model of central places. J Urban Econ. 69:240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PJ. 1997. Hierarchical tendencies amongst world cities: a global research proposal. Cities. 14:323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PJ. 2004. World city network: a global urban analysis. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor PJ, Hoyler M, Verbruggen R. 2010. External urban relational process: introducing central flow theory to complement central place theory. Urban Stud. 47:2803–2818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman E. 1941. A theory of location for cities. Am J Sociol. 46:853–864.
   Google Scholar
• Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter R, Kinzig A. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 9: 5. [online]. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/ Ecology and Society. 9:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White DR, Tambayong L. 2014. Oscillatory dynamics of urban hierarchies 900–2000: vulnerability and resilience. In: Mago VK, Dabbaghian V, editors. Computational models of complex systems . Vol. 53. Cham: Springer International Publishing; [cited 2016 Mar 30]; 141–169. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-01285-8_10
   Google Scholar
• White R, Engelen G. 1997. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modelling. Environ Plann B: Plann Des. 24:235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AG. 2002. Complex spatial systems: challenges for modellers. Math Comput Model. 36:379–387.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman A. 1965. The metabolism of cities. Sci Am. 213:179–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yapa LS, Mayfield RC. 1978. Non-adoption of innovations. Econ Geogr. 54:145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young OR. 2010. Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environ Change. 20:378–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young OR, Berkhout F, Gallopin GC, Janssen MA, Ostrom E, Van Der Leeuw S. 2006. The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Global Environ Change. 16:304–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar