Assessing the ecological dimension of urban resilience and sustainability

References

• Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström. 2005. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 309:1036–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AGU – Agencia de Gestión Urbana de la CDMX. (2014). Sustituirá DF 3 mil km de tuberías para agua. Available from: www.agu.df.gob.mx/sintesis/index.php/invertira-gdf-10-mil-mdp-en-red-hidrica/
   Google Scholar
• Agyeman J, Bullard R, Evans B. 2003. Just sustainabilities - Development in an unequal world. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Baccini P, Brunner P. 2012. Metabolism of the Antroposphere. Analysis, evaluation, design. Cambridge, Massachusetts /London, UK: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett S, Satterthwaite D. 2016. Cities on a finite planet. Transformative responses to climate change. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bithas KP, Chirstofakis M. 2006. Environmentally sustainable cities. Crit Rev OperCond Sustain Dev. 14:177–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd E, Juhola S. 2015. Adaptive climate change governance for urban resilience. Urban Stud. 52(7):1234–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand FS, Jax K. 2007. Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc. 12(1):23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner N. 2014. Implosions /Explosions. Towards a study of planetary urbanization. Germany: Jovis Verlag GmbH. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Brown K. 2012. Policy discourses of resilience. In: Pelling D, Navarete M, Redclift M, editors. Climate change and the crisis of Capitalist: A chance to reclaim sel, society, and nature. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruckmeier K. 2013. Natural resource use and gobal change. New interdisciplinary perspectives in social ecology. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cambell S. 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plann Assoc. 62(3):296–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti F. 2015. Conclusion: re-thinking the eco-city? In: Caprotti, F. Eco-cities and the transition to low carbon economies. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P. 2011. Smart cities in Europe. J Urban Technol. 18(2):65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDMX-INEGI. 2016. Anuario estadístico y geográfico de la Ciudad de México 2016. Mexico: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• Checa-Artasu M. 2016. Las áreas verdes en la Ciudad de México. Las diversas escalas de una geografía urbana. Biblio3W. Revista Bibliográfica De Geografía Y Ciencias Sociales. XXI(1.159):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chelleri L. 2012. From the «resilient city» to urban resilience. A review essay on understanding and integrating the resilience perspective for urban systems. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica. 58.2:287–306.
   Google Scholar
• Chelleri L, Waters J, Olazabal M, Minucci G. 2015. Resilience trade-offs: addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience. Environ Urban. 27(1):181–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TC, Lin CF. 2008. Greenhouse gases emissions from waste management practices using Life Cycle Inventory model. J Hazard Mater. 155(1–2):23–31. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertow M. 2008. “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis. J Ind Ecol. 11(1):11–30. doi:10.1162/jiec.2007.1110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craighill AL, Powell JC. 1996. Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: a case study. Resour Conserv Recy. 17(2):75–96. doi:10.1016/0921-3449(96)01105-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONEVAL. 2012. Informe Annual sobre la situación de la pobrez y rezago social. México: Distrito Federal. Available from: www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/31492/Distrito_Federal_1_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cosme I, Santos R, O`Neill D. 2017. Assessing the degrowth discourse: a review and analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals. J Clean Prod. 119:321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado Ramos, GC. 2015a. Water and the political ecology of urban metabolism: the case of Mexico City. J Political Ecol. 22:98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado Ramos, GC. 2015b. Complejidad e interdisciplina en las nuevas perspectivas socioecológicas. Letras Verdes. 17:108–130.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado Ramos, GC. 2013. Climate change and metabolic dynamics in Latin American major cities. Trans Ecol Environ. 179:39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado Ramos GC. 2012. Metabolismo urbano y transporte. In: Delgado Ramos GC. ( coord). Transporte, ciudad y cambio climático. Mexico: CEIICH-PINCC, UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado Ramos GC, Aragón-Durand F. 2016. Mexico: bringing together development and climate change adaptation and mitigation agendas. In: Bartlett S, Satterthwaite D, editors. Cities on a finite planet. Transformative responses to climate change. New York, USA: Routledge; p. 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado Ramos GC, De Luca Zuria A, Vázquez Zentella V. 2015. Adaptación y Mitigación Urbana del Cambio Climático en México. Mexico: CEIICH-PINCC, UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Derickson KD 2017. Urban geography III. Anthropocene urbanism. Prog Hum Geo. doi:10.1177/0309132516686012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodman D, Ayers J, Huq S. 2009. Building Resilience. In: Starke L, editor. State of the world; into a warming world. The Worldwatch Institute. London, UK/New York, USA: W.W.Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Downton PF. 2009. Ecopolis. Architecture and cities for a changing climate. Springer /CSIRO. Australia: Collingwood.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2014. The water-energy-food nexus. A new approach in support of food security and sustainable agriculture. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrao P, Fernandez JE. 2013. Sustainable urban metabolism. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finco A, Nijkamp P. 2001. Pathway to urban sustainability. J Environ Policy Plann. 3(4):289–309.
   Google Scholar
• Folke C. 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change. 16(3):253–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girardet Herbert. 2004. Cities, people, planet: urban development and climate change. London, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• GDF - Gobierno del Distrito Federal. 2010. Programa de Manejo Integral de Residuos Solidos del Distrito Federal. Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal. No 925. Mexico City. Available from: http://residuossolidos.df.gob.mx/work/sites/tdf_rs/resources/LocalContent/54/2/PGIRS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guibrunet L, Castán Broto V, Sanzana Calvet M. 2016. Flows, system boundaries and the politics of urban metabolism: waste management in Mexico City and Santiago de Chile. Geoforum. In Press. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718516300380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson LH, Pritchard L. 2002. Resilience and the behaviour of large.scale systems. Washington, D.C., USA: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2006. Spaces of global capitalism: A theory of uneven geographical development. London, UK/New York, USA: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton G, Hunter C. 1994. Sustainable Cities. Regional Policy and Development Series 7. London, UK: ​Jessica Kingley Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Rahul. H, Balachandra P, Bimlesh. K, Bansode S, Murali B. 2013. Indicator-based urban sustainability – A review. Energy Sustain Dev. 17:55–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson M, Marvin S. 2010. Urbanism in the Anthropocene: ecological urbanism or premium ecological enclaves? City. 14(3):298–313.
   Google Scholar
• Holden M. 2013. Sustainability indicator systems within urban governance: usability analysis of sustainability indicator systems as boundary objects. Ecol Indic. 32:89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands RG. 2008. “Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City. 12(3):303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Holling CS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 4:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Howells et al. 2013. Integrated analysis of climate change, land-use, energy and water strategies. Nat Clim Chang. 3:621–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICLEI-GIZ-BMZ. 2014. Operationalizing the Urban NEXUS. Towards resource-efficient and integrated cities and metropolitan regions. Berlin, Germany: GIZ / ICLEI.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Spatial Planning. In: Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. contribution of working group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IntergovernmentalPanel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge Univesity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson T. 2009. Prosperity without growth. Economics for a finite planet. London, UK and Washington, USA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy C, Pincetl S, Bunje P. 2011. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ Pollut. 159(8–9):1965–1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Linzner R, Ali M. 2013. Briefing: waste management sustainability in low-income countries. Proceed ICE - Waste Res Manage. 166:49–51. doi:10.1680/warm.13.00007
   Google Scholar
• Litman T. 2012. Land use impacts on transport. How Land Use Factors Affect Travel Behavior. Victoria, BC., Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available from: www.vtpi.org/landtravel.pdfhttp://www.vtpi.org/landtravel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones, Tony. 2004. Urban design for sustainability: final report of the Working Group on Urban Design for Sustainability to the European Union Expert Group on the Urban Environment. Project Report. Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon D, Derickson KD. 2012. From resilience to resourcefulness: a critique of resilience policy and activism. Prog Hum Geogr. 37(2):253–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow S, Newell J, Stults M. 2016. Defining urban resilience. Rev Landscape Urban Plan. 147:38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelutti E, Smith H. 2014. The realpolitik of informal city governance. The interplay of powers in Mumbai’s un-recognized settlements. Habitat Int. 44: 367–374. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397514001192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair S, George B, Malano HM, Arora M, Nawarathna B. 2014. Water-energy-greenhouse gas nexus of urban water systems: review of concepts, state-of-art and methods. Resour Conserv Recy. 89:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neirotti P, De Marco A, Cagliano AC, Mangano G, Scorrano F. 2014. Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylised facts. Cities. 38:25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman M. 1998. Does planning need the plan? J Am Plann Assoc. 64(2):208–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer E. 2003. Weak versus Strong Sustainability. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paz M. 2015. “Tala de árboles en el DF para beneficiar construcciones”. Diario de México. Mexico City, December 9. Available from: www.diariodemexico.com.mx/tala-de-arboles-en-el-df/
   Google Scholar
• PAOT - Procuraduría Ambiental y del Ordenamiento Territorial del Distrito Federal. 2010. Estudio de zonas impactadas por tiraderos clandestinos de residuos de la construcción en el Distrito Federal. Mexico City, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson J, Schulz K, Vervoort J, van der Hel, Widerberg O, Adler C, Hurlbert M, Anderton K. 2016. Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environ Innovat Socie Trans. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzo B. 2015. Problematizing resilience: implications for planning theory and practice. Cities. 43:133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon. P, Cherim E, Bocken N. 2017. Circular Cities: mapping six cities in transition. Environ Innov Soc Transit. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman C. 2014. Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits? Ecol Soc. 19(2):37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldivar-Sali AN. 2010. A Global Typology of Cities: classification Tree Analysis of Urban Resource Consumption. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite D, Dodman D. 2013. Towards resilience and transformation for cities within a finite planet. Environ Urban. 25(2):291–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheinberg A, Anschütz J. 2006. Slim pickin’s: supporting waste pickers in the ecological modernization of urban waste management systems. Int J Technol Manag Sustain Dev. 5(3):257–270.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider A, Friedl M, Potere D. 2009. A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data. Environ Res Lett. 4(4):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson R, Zimmermann M, editors. 2013. The economy of green cities. A world compendium on the green urban economy. London, UK /New York, USA: Springer/ICLEI.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen W, Richardson K, RockströM J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, De Vries W, De WCA, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Sciencexpress. doi:10.1126/science.1259855
   Google Scholar
• SEDEMA. 2014. Programa de Acción Climática Ciudad de México 2014-2020. Mexico City: Policy document.
   Google Scholar
• SEDEMA. 2015. Inventario de residuos solidos CDMX-2014. ​Gobi erno de la Ciudad de Mexico. Mexico City, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• SEDESOL. 2010. Documento diagnóstico de rescate de espacios públicos. Gobierno Federal. Mexico. Available from: www.sedesol.gob.mx/work/models/SEDESOL/Sedesol/sppe/dgap/diagnostico/Diagnostico_PREP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SEDESOL. 2012. Programa de ordenación de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México. Actualización 2012. SEDESOL-CDMX-Estado de Hidalgo-EDOMEX.
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. 1999. Development as Freedom. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. 1989. Development as capability expansion. J Dev Plann. 19:41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Simmie J, Martin R. 2010. The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc. 3(1):27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith N. 1984. Uneven development. nature, capital and the production of space. The University of Georgia Press. Athens, GA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Stossel Z, Kissinger M, Meir A. 2015. Measuring the biophysical dimension of urban sustainability. Ecological Econ. 120:153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez M, Delgado J. 2007. “La expansión urbana probable de la Ciudad de México. Un scenario pesimista y dos alternativos para el año 2020. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos. 22(1):101–142.
   Google Scholar
• Swilling M, Annecke E. 2012. Just Transitions - Explorations of sustainability in an unfair world. Claremont, South Africa: UCT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swilling M, Robinson B, Marvin S, Hodson M, Hajer M. 2013. City-level decoupling - urban resource flows and the governance of infrastructure transitions, a report of the working group on cities of the international resource panel. ​​United Nations Environment Programme - UNEP. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E, Heynen N, Kaika M, editors. 2005. In the nature of cities – urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson G, Newman P. 2016. Geoengineering in the Anthropocene through regenerative urbanism. Geosciences. 46(6):2–16.
   Google Scholar
• UNHABITAT. 2011. State of the world’s cities 2010/2011. bridging the urban divide. UNHABITAT. Nairobi, Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• UNHABITAT. 2016a. World cities report 2016. UNHABITAT. Nairobi, Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• UNHABITAT. 2016b. A guide to assist national and local governments to monitor and report on SDG Goal 11 indicators. Available from: unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/SDG-Goal%2011%20Monitoring%20Framework%2025-02-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2014. World urbanization prospects, the 2014 revision. The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations.New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara SE, Damgaard A, Gomez D. 2015. The efficiency of informality: quantifying greenhouse gas reductions from informal recycling in Bogotá, Colombia. J Ind Ecol. 20(1):n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/jiec.12257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker B, Gunderson L, Kinzig A, Folke C, Carpenter S, Schultz L. 2006. A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in socio-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 11(1):13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss M, Cattaneo C. 2017. Degrowth – taking stock and reviewing and emerging academic paradigm. Ecological Econ. 137:220–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson D, Araba A, Chinwah K, Cheeseman C. 2009. Building recycling rates through the informal sector. Waste Manag(New York, N.Y.). 29(2):629–635. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DC, Rodic L, Scheinberg A, Velis CA, Alabaster G. 2012. Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Waste Manag Res. 30(3):237–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2010. Climate Finance in the Urban Context. Issues Brief. No. 4. Washington, D.C., USA. Online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/19469
   Google Scholar