Ecosystem services of the Guarapiranga Reservoir watershed (São Paulo, Brazil): value of water supply and implications for management strategies

References

• Ahearn DS, Sheibley RW, Dahlgren RA, Anderson M, Johnson J, Tate KW. 2005. Land use and land cover influence on water quality in the last free-flowing river draining the western Sierra Nevada, California. J Hydrol. 313:234–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbumozhi V, Radhakrishnan J, Yamaji E. 2005. Impact of riparian buffer zones on water quality and associated management considerations. Ecol Eng. 24:517–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade MRM, Salim A, Rossini-Penteado D, Costa JA, Souza AA, Saad AR, Oliveira AMS. 2015. Mapeamento do uso da terra para avaliação da qualidade das águas do Reservatório Guarapiranga [Mapping land use to assess water quality of Guarapiranga Reservoir]. Geociências. 34(2):258–274. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo R. 2017. Recuperação urbana e saneamento ambiental na bacia hidrográfica do Guarapiranga: de onde viemos, onde estamos e para onde vamos [Urban recovery and environmental sanitation of the Guarapiranga watershed: from where we came, where we are and where we will go]. In: Bicudo CEM, Bicudo DC, editors. 100 Anos da Represa Guarapiranga: lições e desafios. 1st ed. Curitiba: Editora CRV; 429–450. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Arruda-Neto JDT, Oliveira MCC, Sarkis JES, Bordini P, Manso-Guevara MV, Garcia F, Prado GR, Krug FJ, Mesa J, Bittencourt-Oliveira MC, et al. 2009. Study of environmental burden of lead in children using teeth as bioindicator. Environ Int. 35(3):614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyruth Z. 2000. Periodic disturbances, trophic gradient and phytoplankton characteristics related to cyanobacterial growth in Guarapiranga Reservoir, São Paulo State, Brazil. Hydrobiologia. 424:51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borger FG. 1998. Valoração Econômica do Meio Ambiente: aplicação da técnica avaliação contingente no caso da bacia do Guarapiranga [Enviromental economic valuation: applying the contingent evaluation in the case of Guarapiranga watershed]. In: Veiga JE, editor. Ciência Ambiental: primeiros Mestrados. 1st ed. São Paulo: Editora Annablume; 229–252. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Braat LC, De Groot R. 2012. The ecosystem services agenda: bringing the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv. 1:4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chichilnisky G, Heal G. 1998. Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature. 391:629–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R. 2000. Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystems. 3(1):4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotrim MEB, Martins EAJ, Furusawa HA, Shihomatsu HM, Monteiro LR, Lebre DT, Otomo JI, Silva LL, Adame G, Brito CF, et al. 2017. Qualidade ecológica da Represa Guarapiranga: água e sedimentos superficiais: multitraçadores ambientais – metais, elementos-traço, interferentes endócrinos, HPAs e fármacos [Ecological quality of the Guarapiranga Reservoir: water and superficial sediments: environmental multiproxies – metal, trace elements, endocrine interferents, APHs and drugs]. In: Bicudo CEM, Bicudo DC, editors. 100 Anos da Represa Guarapiranga: lições e desafios. 1st ed. Curitiba: Editora CRV; 429–450. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Farrik KK, Branfireun BA. 2015. Flowpaths, source water contributions and water residence times in a Mexican tropical dry forest catchment. J Hydrol. 529(3):854–865.
   Google Scholar
• Fix M, Arantes P, Tanaka G. 2003. The case of São Paulo, Brazil. In: United nations human settlements programme, editor. The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements. London: Earthscan; p. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana L, Albuquerque ALS, Brenner M, Bonotto DM, Sabaris TP, Pires MA, Bicudo DC. 2014. The eutrophication history of a tropical water supply reservoir in Brazil. J Paleolimnol. 51(1):29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ. 86:235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, DL, Tank AMGK, Rusticucci M, Alexander LV, Brönnimann S, Charabi Y, Dentener FJ, Dlugokencky EJ, Easterling DR, Kaplan A, Soden BJ, Thorne PW, Wild M, Zhai PM. 2013. Observations: Atmosphere and Surface. In: Stocker, TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editors. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 159-254.
   Google Scholar
• Hackbart VCS, Lima GTNP, Santos RF. 2017. Theory and practice of water ecosystem services valuation: where are we going?. Ecosyst Serv. 23:218–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologica Electronica. 4(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Honey-Rosés J, Acuña V, Bardina M, Brozovic N, Marcé R, Munné A, Sabater S, Termes M, Valero F, Vega À, et al. 2013. Examining the demand for ecosystem services: the value of stream restoration for drinking water treatment managers in the Llobregat River, Spain. Ecol Econ. 90:196–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer RChang H. 2014. Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in the tualatin and yamhill basins under climate change and urbanization. applied Geography. 53:402-416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, McGrath FL, Vierikko K, Geneletti D, Sevecke KJ, et al. 2016. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv. 22(B):213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler BL, Polasky S, Brauman KA, Johnson KA, Finlay JC, O’Neill A, Kovacs K, Dalzell B. 2012. Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 109(45):18619–18624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liquete C, Udias A, Conte G, Mase F. 2016. Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits. Ecosyst Serv. 22(B):392–401.
   Google Scholar
• López-Doval JC, Montagner CC, Albuquerque AF, Moschini-Carlos V, Umbuzeiro G, Pompêo M. 2017. Nutrients, emerging pollutants and pesticides in a tropical urban reservoir: spatial distributions and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 575:1307–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J, Sipilä M. 2009. Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For Urban Gree. 8:309–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miraglia SGEK, Gouveia N. 2014. Custos da poluição atmosférica nas regiões metropolitanas brasileiras [Costs of atmospheric pollution in the Brazilian metropolitan regions]. Cien Saúde Coletiva. 19(10):4141–4147. Portuguese.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miraglia SGEK, Saldiva PH. 2005. An evaluation of air pollution health impacts and costs in São Paulo. Brazil Environ Manage. 35(5):667–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokondoko P, Manson RH, Pérez-Maqueo O. 2016. Assessing the service of water quality regulation by quantifying the effects of land use on water quality and public health in central Veracruz, Mexico. Ecosyst Serv. 22:161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta RS. 1998. Manual para valoração econômica de recursos ambientais [Handbook for economic valuation of environmental resources]. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA/MMA/PNUD/CNPq. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Müller F, Burkhard B. 2012. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 1:26–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira JM, Medeiros MAA, Arruda FST. 2000. Valoração econômica do meio ambiente: ciência ou empiricismo? [Economic valuation of environment: science or empiricism?]. Cad Cien Tecnol. 17(2):81–115. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira PLD, Figueiredo BRD, Cardoso AA. 2011. Atmospheric pollutants in São Paulo state, Brazil and effects on human health–a review. Geochimica Brasiliensis. 25(1):17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Orsi RH, Stoppe NC, Sato MIZ, Ottoboni LMM. 2007. Identification of Escherichia coli from groups A, B1, B2 and D in drinking water in Brazil. J Water Health. 5(2):323–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randhir TO, Ekness P. 2013. Water quality change and habitat potential in riparian ecosystems. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 13(3):192–200.
   Google Scholar
• Saad AR, Martinez SS, Goulart ME, Semensatto D, Vargas RR, Andrade MRM. 2015. Efeitos do uso do solo e implantação da estação de tratamento de esgoto sobre a qualidade das águas do Rio Baquirivu-Guaçu, Região Metropolitana de São Paulo [Effects of land use and implementation of a sewage treatment plant on the water quality of the Baquirivu-Guaçu river, São Paulo metropolitan region]. Rev Bras Rec Hídr. 20:147–156. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• SABESP. 2008. Dossiê Sistema Guarapiranga [Guarapiranga system dossier]. São Paulo: Espaço das Águas Fundação Patrimônio Histórico da Energia e Saneamento Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo. http://memoriasabesp.sabesp.com.br/acervos/dossies/pdf/9_sistema_guarapiranga.pdf. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna CL, Melcher SS, Carvalho MC, Gelmego MP, Azevedo MTP. 2007. Planktic cyanobacteria from upper Tietê basin reservoirs, SP, Brazil. Braz J Bot. 30(1):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• São Paulo (Estado). 2011. Atualização do Plano de Desenvolvimento e Proteção Ambiental (PDPA) da bacia hidrográfica do Guarapiranga [Update of the development and environmental protection plan (PDPA) of the Guarapiranga watershed]. http://www.ambiente.sp.gov.br/cpla/2013/03/14/aprm-area-de-protecao-e-recuperacao-de-mananciais/. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Semensatto D.Asami T. 2017. Além dos Índices Numéricos: a qualidade da água da Represa Guarapiranga ao longo do tempo e do espaço [Beyond numerical indices: the water quality of the Guarapiranga Reservoir through time and space]. In: Bicudo, CEM, Bicudo, DC, editors. 100 anos da Represa Guarapiranga: lições e desafios [100 years of the Guarapiranga Reservoir: lessons and challenges]. 1st ed. São Paulo: Editora CRV; p. 383-400.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa RS, Semensatto D. 2015. Qualidade da água do Rio Piracicaba: estudo de caso do efeito da estação de tratamento de esgoto Piracicamirim, município de Piracicaba (SP) [Water quality of the Piracicaba River Basin: study case of the effect of piracicamirim wastewater treatment plant, Piracicaba (SP)]. Rev Bras Rec Hídr. 20:629–638. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Sun S, Sun G, Caldwell P, McNulty S, Cohen E, Xiao J, Zhang Y. 2015. Drought impacts on ecosystem functions of the U.S. National forests and grasslands: part II assessment results and management implications. For Ecol Manage. 353:269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarifa JR, Armani G. 2001. Os climas naturais [The natural climates]. In: Tarifa JR, Azevedo TR, editors. Os Climas na Cidade de São Paulo: teoria e prática. 1st ed. São Paulo: Geousp; 34–46. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias S. 2013. Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland. Integr Environ Assess Manage. 9(3):243–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong STY, Chen W. 2002. Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J Environ Manage. 66:377–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tundisi JG. 2008. Water resources in the future: problems and solutions. Estudos Avançados. 22(63):7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Tundisi JG, Matsumura-Tundisi T, Ciminelli VS, Barbosa FA. 2015. Water availability, water quality water governance: the future ahead. Proc Int Assoc Hydrol Sciences. 366:75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros M 2004 Jul 25. Esgoto dobra custo de tratamento da água [Sewage doubles water treatment cost]. Folha do Estado de São Paulo. [accessed 2017 Dec 26]. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/cotidian/ff2507200401.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Whately M, Cunha P. 2006. Seminário Guarapiranga 2006: proposição de ações prioritárias para garantir água de boa qualidade para abastecimento público [Guarapiranga Seminar 2006: priority actions to ensure good quality water for public supply]. São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar