1,708
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Technology in Urban Service Co-Production and Guest Editors: Giuseppe Faldi, Marco Ranzato and Luisa Moretto

Co-producing an urban mobility service? The role of actors, policies, and technology in the boom and bust of dockless bike-sharing programmes

Pages 209-224 | Received 23 May 2019, Accepted 18 May 2020, Published online: 01 Jun 2020

References

  • Ahlers R, Cleaver F, Rusca M, Schwartz K. 2014. Informal space in the urban waterscape: disaggregation and co-production of water services. Water Altern. 7(1):1–14.
  • Ai Y, Li Z, Gan M, Zhang Y, Yu D, Chen W, Ju Y. 2018. A deep learning approach on short-term spatiotemporal distribution forecasting of dockless bike-sharing system. Neural Comput Appl. 1–13. doi:10.1007/s00521-018-3470-9.
  • Alford J. 2014. The multiple facets of co-production: building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Manage Rev. 16(3):299–316. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806578.
  • Brandsen T, Steen T, Verschuere B. 2018. Co-creation and co-production in public services: urgent issues in practice and research. In: Brandsen T, Steen T, Verschuere B, editors. Co-production and co-creation: engaging citizens in public services. New York: Routledge. p. 3–8.
  • Brandsen T, Honingh M. 2018. Definitions of co-production and co-creation. In: Brandsen T, Steen T, Verschuere B, editors. Co-production and co-creation: engaging citizens in public services. New York: Routledge; p. 9–17.
  • Chang S, Song R, He S, Qiu G. 2018. Innovative bike-sharing in China: solving faulty bike-sharing recycling problem. J Adv Transport. 2018:1–10. doi:10.1155/2018/4941029.
  • DeMaio P. 2009. Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future. J Public Transport. 12(4):41–56. doi:10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3.
  • Du M, Cheng L. 2018. Better understanding the characteristics and influential factors of different travel patterns in free-floating bike sharing: evidence from Nanjing, China. Sustainability. 2018(10):1244. doi:10.3390/su10041244.
  • Fishman E. 2016. Bikeshare: a review of recent literature. Transport Rev. 36:92–113. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1033036.
  • Francis CB. 2001. Quasi-Public, Quasi-Private trends in emerging market economies. The case of China. Comp Polit. 33(3):275–294. doi:10.2307/422404.
  • Gu T, Kim I, Currie G. 2019. To be or not to be dockless: empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China. Transp Res Part A. 119(2019):122–147.
  • Jaglin S. 2002. The right to water versus cost recovery: participation, urban water supply and the poor in sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Urban. 14(1):231–245. doi:10.1177/095624780201400119.
  • Jia L, Liu X, Liu Y. 2018. Impact of different stakeholders of bike-sharing industry on users’ intention of civilized use of bike-sharing. Sustain. 10. doi:10.3390/su10051437.
  • Joshi A, Moore M. 2004. Institutionalised Co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. J Dev Stud. 40(4):31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184.
  • Li Y, Zheng Y, Yang Q 2018. Dynamic bike reposition: a spatio-temporal reinforcement learning approach. KDD ‘18 Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, London, UK. p. 1724–1733. doi:10.1145/3219819.3220110
  • Liu Z, Shen Y, Zhu Y, 2018. Inferring dockless shared bike distribution in new cities. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining - WSDM ’18. New York: ACM Press. pp. 378–386. doi:10.1145/3159652.3159708.
  • Marvin S, Guy S, Medd W, Moss T. 2010. Conclusions: the transformative power of intermediaries. In: Guy S, Marvin S, Medd W, Moss T, editors. Shaping urban infrastructures: intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks. London: Routledge; p. 209–217.
  • Midgley P, 2011. Bicycle-sharing schemes: enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas. New York (UN) Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Background Paper No. 8, CSD19/2011/BP8
  • Mooney SJ, Hosford K, Howe B, Yan A, Winters M, Bassok A, Hirsch JA. 2019. Freedom from the station: spatial equity in access to dockless bike share. J Transport Geogr. 74(2019):91–96. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.009.
  • Moretto L, Faldi G, Ranzato M, Rosati F, Ilito Boozi JP, Teller J. 2018. Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the global South. Environ Urban. 30(2):425–443. doi:10.1177/0956247818790652.
  • Moretto L, Ranzato M. 2017. A socio-natural standpoint to understand coproduction of water, energy and waste services. Urban Res Pract. 10(1):1–21. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1201528.
  • Moss T, Guy S, Marvin S, Medd W. 2010. Intermediaries and the reconfiguration of urban infrastructures: an introduction. In: Guy S, Marvin S, Medd W, Moss T, editors. Shaping urban infrastructures: intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks. London: Routledge; p. 1–13.
  • Ostrom E. 1996. Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy, and development. World Dev. 24(6):1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
  • Pan L, Cai Q, Fang Z, Tang P, Huang L, 2018. Rebalancing dockless bike sharing systems. arXiv:1802.04592 [cs], February http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04592arXiv: 1802.04592.
  • Ranzato M, Moretto L. 2018. Co-production and the environment. In: Brandsen T, Steen T, Verschuere B, editors. Co-production and co-creation: engaging citizens in public services. New York: Routledge; p. 180–190.
  • Shen Y, Zhang X, Zhao J. 2018. Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing in Singapore. Int J Sustain Transp. 8318:1–15. doi:10.1080/15568318.2018.1429696.
  • Shi J-G, Si H, Wu G, Su Y, Lan J. 2018. Critical factors to achieve dockless bike-sharing sustainability in China: a stakeholder-oriented network perspective. Sustainability. 2018(10):2090. doi:10.3390/su10062090.
  • Shi W. 2017. An analysis of patents applications from mobike and ofo. J North China Electr Univ (Social Science). 2017(5):93–97.
  • Si H, Shi J-G, Wu G, Chen J, Zhao X. 2019. Mapping the bike sharing research published from 2010 to 2018: A scientometric review. J Clean Prod. 213(2019):415–427. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.157.
  • Sorrentino M, Sicilia M, Howlett M. 2018. Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy Soc. 37(3):277–293. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676.
  • Spinney J, Lin W-I. 2018. Are you being shared? Mobility, data and social relations in Shanghai’s Public Bike Sharing 2.0 sector. Appl Mobilities. 3:66–83. doi:10.1080/23800127.2018.1437656.
  • Sun Y. 2018. Sharing and riding: how the dockless bike sharing scheme in China shapes the city. Urban Sci. 2018(2):68. doi:10.3390/urbansci2030068.
  • Taylor A 2018. China is still sorting through its colorful bike-share graveyards. [accessed 2019 April 22]. https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2018/08/china-abandoned-bike-share-graveyards/566576/
  • van Eijk C, Gasco M. 2018. Unravelling the co-producers: who are they and what motivations do they have. In: Brandsen T, Steen T, Verschuere B, editors. Co-production and co-creation: engaging citizens in public services. New York: Routledge; p. 63–76.
  • van Vliet BJM. 2012. Sustainable innovation in network-bound systems: implications for the consumption of water, waste water and electricity services. J Environ Policy Plann. 14(3):263–278. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.702563.
  • Wang K, Akar G. 2019. Gender gap generators for bike share ridership: evidence from Citi Bike system in New York City. J Transport Geogr. 76(2019):1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.02.003.
  • Xu C, Ji J, Liu P. 2018. The station-free sharing bike demand forecasting with a deep learning approach and large-scale datasets. Transp Res Part C. 95(2018):47–60. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.013.
  • Zhang Y, Lin D, Mi Z. 2019. Electric fence planning for dockless bike-sharing services. J Clean Prod. 206(2019):383–393. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.215.
  • Zhang Y, Mi Z. 2018. Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis. Appl Energy. 220(2018):296–301. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101.