1,719
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Technology in Urban Service Co-Production and Guest Editors: Giuseppe Faldi, Marco Ranzato and Luisa Moretto

Co-production of access and hybridisation of configurations: a socio-technical approach to urban electricity in Cotonou and Ibadan

ORCID Icon &
Pages 180-195 | Received 09 Jul 2019, Accepted 04 Jun 2020, Published online: 17 Jun 2020

References

  • Adams EA, Boateng GO. 2018. Are urban informal communities capable of co-production? The influence of community–public partnerships on water access in Lilongwe, Malawi. Environ Urban. 30(2):461–480. doi:10.1177/0956247818792059.
  • AfDB. 2018. African statistical yearbook. Abidjan: Economic Commission for Africa, African Development Bank Group, African Union Commission; [accessed 2019 Apr 25]. https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/African_Statistical_Yearbook_2018.pdf.
  • Ahlers R, Cleaver F, Rusca M, Schwartz K. 2014. Informal space in the urban waterscape: disaggregation and co-production of water services. Water Altern. 7(1):14.
  • Akrich M. 1989. La construction d’un système socio-technique. Anthropol Soc. 13(2):31–54. doi:10.7202/015076ar.
  • Akrich M. 1993. Technique et médiation. Réseaux Communication - Technologie - Société. 11(60):87–98. doi:10.3406/reso.1993.2368.
  • Akrich M. 2010. Comment décrire les objets techniques? Tech Cult. 54–55:205–219. doi:10.4000/tc.4999.
  • Baptista I. 2016. “We live on estimates”: everyday practices of prepaid electricity and the urban condition in Maputo, Mozambique. Int J Urban Reg Res. 39:1004–1019. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12314.
  • Bierschenk T, Olivier de Sardan J-P. 2014. States at work: dynamics of African Bureaucracies. Leiden, Nederland: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004264960
  • Blundo G, Meur P-YL. 2009. The governance of daily life in Africa: ethnographic explorations of public and collective services. Leiden, Nederland: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004171282.i-347.
  • Bonnichon P, Gény P, Nemo J. 2012. Présences françaises outre-mer (XVIe-XXIe siècles). Tome I - Histoire : périodes et continents. Académie des sciences d’outre-mer. KARTHALA Editions.
  • Bovaird T. 2007. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services. Public Adm Rev. 67:846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
  • Chatzis K. 2017. Introduction générale. Le nouveau monde des infrastructures. In: Chatzis K, Jeannot G, November V, Ughetto P, editors. Les métamorphoses des infrastructures, entre béton et numérique. Éditions PIE Peter Lang SA; Bern, Suisse: Peter Lang B: p. 177–202.
  • Chokor BA. 1986. Ibadan. Cities. 3(2):106–116. doi:10.1016/0264-2751(86)90049-1.
  • Clerc V, Criqui L, Josse G. 2017. Urbanisation autonome : pour une autre action urbaine sur les quartiers précaires. Métropolitiques; [accessed 2018 Feb 11]. http://www.metropolitiques.eu/Urbanisation-autonome-pour-une-autre-action-urbaine-sur-les-quartiers-precaires.html.
  • Coutard O, Rutherford J. 2009. Les réseaux transformés par leurs marges: développement et ambivalence des techniques «décentralisées». Flux. 2:6–13. doi:10.3917/flux.076.0006.
  • de Bercegol R, Monstadt J. 2018. The Kenya slum electrification program. Local politics of electricity networks in Kibera. Energy Res Social Sci. 41:249–258. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.007.
  • Desarnaud G. 2016. Electrifier durablement l’Afrique et l’Asie. Paris: Ifri Note de l’Ifri.
  • ESMAP. 2016. IEA, IRENA, Inited Nations Statistics Division, World Bank Group, World Health Organization. http://trackingsdg7.esmap.org/.
  • Fabiyi O. 2004. Gated Neighbourhoods and privatisation of urban security in Ibadan Metropolis. Ibadan: Institut français de recherche en Afrique (Dynamiques africaines); [accessed 2018 Feb 21]. http://books.openedition.org/ifra/473.
  • Falola T. 2012. Ibadan: foundation, growth and change, 1830–1960. Ibadan: Bookcraft, Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Fourchard L. 2003. Ibadan, Nigeria. The Challenge of Slums: global report on human settlements.
  • Jaglin S. 2014. Regulating service delivery in southern cities: rethinking urban heterogeneity. In: Parnell S, Oldfield S, editors. A routledge handbook on cities of the global south. London: Routledge; p. 434–447.
  • Jaglin S. 2016. Is the network challenged by the pragmatic turn in African cities? Urban transition and hybrid delivery configurations. In: Coutard O, Rutherford J, editors. Beyond the Networked City: infrastructure reconfigurations and urban change in the North and South. London and New York: Routledge; p. 182–203.
  • Jaglin S. 2019. Electricity autonomy and power grids in africa: from rural experiments to urban hybridizations. In: Lopez F, Pellegrino M, Coutard O, editors. Local energy autonomy: spaces, scales, politics. London, UK: ISTE Ltd, Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons; p. 291–310.
  • Joshi A, Moore M. 2004. Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. J Dev Stud. 40(4):31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184.
  • Lawhon M, Nilsson D, Silver J, Ernstson H, Lwasa S. 2017 Aug 21. Thinking through heterogeneous infrastructure configurations. Urban Stud. 1–13. doi:10.1177/0042098017720149.
  • Mitlin D. 2008. With and beyond the state — co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environ Urban. 20(2):339–360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117.
  • Mitlin D, Bartlett S. 2018. Editorial: co-production – key ideas. Environ Urban. 30(2):355–366. doi:10.1177/0956247818791931.
  • Monstadt J, Schramm S. 2017. Toward the networked city? Translating technological ideals and planning models in water and sanitation systems in dar es salaam: toward the networked city? Int J Urban Reg Res. 41:104–125. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12436.
  • Moretto L, Faldi G, Ranzato M, Rosati F, Boozi P, Teller J. 2018. Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the global South. Environ Urban. 30(2):425–443. doi:10.1177/0956247818790652.
  • Munro P. 2019. On, off, below and beyond the urban electrical grid the energy bricoleurs of Gulu Town. Urban Geogr (Online), 1–20.
  • Nastiti A, Meijerink SV, Oelmann M, Smits AJM, Muntalif BS, Sudradjat A, Roosmini D. 2017. Cultivating Innovation and equity in co-production of commercialized spring water in peri-urban Bandung, Indonesia. Water Altern. 10(1):134–154.
  • Oladejo B. 2017. IBEDC Explains Reasons For Power Rejection And Low Power Supply In Some Areas. Sparkonline; [accessed 2019 Apr 22]. http://sparkonline.com.ng/2017/01/ibedc-explains-reasons-for-power-rejection-and-low-power-supply-in-some-areas.html.
  • Olivier de Sardan J-P. 2011. Local powers and the co-delivery of public goods in Niger. IDS Bull. 42:32–42. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00209.x.
  • Ostrom E. 1996. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Dev. 24(6):1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
  • Pinson G. 2019. Penser par cas, penser par comparaison. Études urbaines et pratique des monographies comparées. In: Authier JY, Baggioni V, Cousin B, Fijalkow Y, Launay L, editors. D’une ville à l’autre. La comparaison internationale en sociologie urbaine. Paris: La Découverte. ISBN 978-2-348-04058-0.
  • Silver J. 2015. Disrupted infrastructures: an urban political ecology of interrupted electricity in Accra. Int J Urban Reg Res. 39:984–10003. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.12317/pdf.
  • Smith S. 2018. Hybrid networks, everyday life and social control: electricity access in urban Kenya. Urban Stud. 1–17. doi:10.1177/0042098018760148.
  • Sotindjo SD. 2010. Cotonou. L’explosion d’une capitale économique (1945–1985). L’Harmattan. (Études africaines).
  • Té-Léssia Assoko J. 2018. Électricité : comment le Nigeria a saboté sa réforme. JeuneAfrique.com; [accessed 2018 Sept 2]. http://www.jeuneafrique.com/mag/593452/economie/electricite-comment-le-nigeria-a-sabote-sa-reforme/.
  • UNEP. 2017. Atlas of Africa energy resources. Nairobi (Kenya): United Nations Environment Programme.
  • United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world : the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New-York: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015.
  • Verschuere B, Brandsen T, Pestoff V. 2012. Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas. 23(4):1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
  • Watson V. 2014. Co-production and collaboration in planning – the difference. Plann Theory Prac. 15(1):62–76. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.866266.