946
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Technology in Urban Service Co-Production and Guest Editors: Giuseppe Faldi, Marco Ranzato and Luisa Moretto

An incremental approach to service co-production: unfolding the co-evolution of the built environment and water and sanitation infrastructures

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 162-179 | Received 23 Sep 2019, Accepted 20 Aug 2020, Published online: 13 Oct 2020

References

  • Ahlers R, Cleaver F, Rusca M, Schwartz K. 2014. Informal space in the urban waterscape: disaggregation and co-production of water services. Water Altern. 7(1):1–14.
  • Aimini M. 2013. Hànôi 2050, Trilogia di un paesaggio Asiatico [Trilogy of an Asian landscape]. Roma: INU Edizioni.
  • Allen A, Hofmann P, Mukherjee J, Walnycki A. 2017. Water trajectories through non-networked infrastructure: insights from peri-urban Dar es Salaam, Cochabamba and Kolkata. Urban Res Pract. 10(1):22–42. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1197306.
  • Anderson P, Tushman ML. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Adm Sci Q. 35:604–633. doi:10.2307/2393511.
  • Bolay J-C, Kern A. 2011. Technology and cities: what type of development is appropriate for cities of the South? J Urban Technol. 18(3):25–43. doi:10.1080/10630732.2011.615563.
  • Bovaird T. 2007. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services. Public Adm Rev. 67:846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
  • Bovaird T, Loeffler E. 2012. From engagement to co-production: the contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas. 23:1119–1138. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6.
  • Brandt S. 1994. How buildings learn. What happens after they are built. New York: Viking Penguin.
  • Brotchie JF. 1984. Technological change and urban form. Environ Plan A: Econ Space. 16(5):583–596. doi:10.1068/a160583.
  • Brudney J, England R. 1983. Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Adm Rev. 43(1):59–65. doi:10.2307/975300.
  • Bui NT, Kawamura A, Amaguchi H, Bui DD, Truong NT, Nakagawa K. 2018. Social sustainability assessment of groundwater resources: a case study of Hanoi, Vietnam. Ecol Indic. 93:1034–1042. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.005.
  • Button C. 2017. The co-production of a constant water supply in Mumbai middle-class apartments. Urban Res Pract. 10(1):102–119. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1197305.
  • Cabrera JE. 2015. Fragmentation urbaine à travers les réseaux techniques [dissertation]. Liège (Belgium): Université de Liège.
  • Cerise E. 2009. Fabrication de la ville de Hanoi entre planification et pratiques habitantes: conception, production et réception des formes bâties [Manufacture of the city of Hanoi between planning and living practices: design, production and reception of built forms] [dissertation]. Paris: Pari. 8.
  • Cornwall A. 2004. Introduction: new democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalised participation. IDS Bulletin. 35(2):1–10.
  • Deleuze G, Guattari F. 1987. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press.
  • Dovey K, King R. 2011. Forms of informality: morphology and visibility of informal settlements. Built Env. 37:1. doi:10.2148/benv.37.1.11.
  • Faldi G, Rosati FN, Moretto L, Teller J. 2019. A comprehensive framework for analyzing co-production of urban water and sanitation services in the Global South. Water Int. 44(8):886–918. doi:10.1080/02508060.2019.1665967.
  • Fanchette S. 2016. Hà Nội, a metropolis in the making. The breakdown in urban integration of villages. Marseille: IRD Éditions.
  • Furlong K. 2014. STS beyond the “modern infrastructure ideal”: extending theory by engaging with infrastructure challenges in the South. Technol Soc. 38:139–147. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.04.001.
  • Geels FW. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy. 31(8–9):1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
  • Geertman SJL. 2003. Who will build the Vietnamese city in the 21st century? Globalization and tradition in land and housing in Hanoi. J Comp Asian Dev. 2(1):169–190. doi:10.1080/15339114.2003.9678377.
  • Geertman SJL. 2007. The self-organizing city in Vietnam: processes of change and transformation in housing in Hanoi [dissertation]. Eindhoven (Netherlands): Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
  • Geertman SJL, Kim B. 2019. A study of informally developed housing and its role in the political arena of a post-reform communist city. In: Rocco R, van Ballegooijen J, editors. The Routledge handbook on informal urbanization. New York (NY): Routledge; p. p. 112–123.
  • Graham S, Thrift N. 2007. Out of order: understanding repair and maintenance. Theory Cult Soc. 24(3):1–25. doi:10.1177/0263276407075954.
  • Habraken NJ 1987. Control hierarchies in complex artifacts. In: Protzen J-P editor. Proceedings of the 1987 Conference on Planning and Design in Architecture at the International Congress on Planning and Design Theory; Aug 17–20; Boston. Massachusetts. p.1–22.
  • Habraken NJ, Teicher J. 1998. The structure of the ordinary: form and control in the built environment. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
  • Hien NT. 2005. Report: urban governance in preservation and management of neighborhood parks/playgrounds in inner-city districts of Hanoi. HealthBridge: Hanoi: Asia Foundation.
  • Jaglin S. 2002. The right to water versus cost recovery: participation, urban water supply and the poor in sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Urban. 14(1):231–245. doi:10.1177/095624780201400119.
  • Jaglin S. 2012. Networked services and features of African urbanization: other path toward globalization. L’espace Geogr. 41(1):51–67. doi:10.3917/eg.411.0051.
  • Joshi A, Moore M. 2004. Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. J Int Dev. 40(4):31–49.
  • Kerkvliet B. 2001. An approach for analysing state-society relations in Vietnam. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia. 16(2):238–278. doi:10.1355/SJ16-2D.
  • Koh DWH. 2006. Wards of Hanoi. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Kyessi AG. 2005. Community-based urban water management in fringe neighbourhoods: the case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Habitat Int. 29:1–25. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00059-6.
  • Labbé D, Musil C. 2014. Periurban land redevelopment in Vietnam under market socialism. Urban Stud. 51(6):1146–1161. doi:10.1177/0042098013495574.
  • Levinthal DA. 1998. The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Ind Corporate Change. 7(2):217–247. doi:10.1093/icc/7.2.217.
  • McFarlane C. 2011. Learning the city: knowledge and translocal assemblage. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
  • McGee TG. 2009. Interrogating the production of urban space in China and Vietnam under market socialism. Asia Pac Viewp. 50(2):228–246. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8373.2009.01395.x.
  • Misra K. 2014. From formal-informal to emergent formalisation: fluidities in the production of urban waterscapes. Water Altern. 7(1):15–34.
  • Mitlin D. 2008. With and beyond the state—co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environ Urban. 20(2):339–360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117.
  • Monstadt J, Schramm S. 2015. Changing sanitation infrastructure in Hanoi: hybrid topologies and the networked city. In: Coutard O, Rutherford J, editors. Beyond the networked city: infrastructure reconfigurations and urban change in the North and South. 1st ed ed. London: Routledge; p. 6–50.
  • Moretto L, Faldi G, Ranzato M, Rosati FN, Ilito Boozi J-P, Teller J. 2018. Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the global South. Environ Urban. 30(2):425–443. doi:10.1177/0956247818790652.
  • Moretto L, Ranzato M. 2017. A socio-natural standpoint to understand coproduction of water, energy and waste services. Urban Res Pract. 10(1):1–21. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1201528.
  • Nabatchi T, Sancino A, Sicilia M. 2017. Varieties of participation in public services: the who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Admin Rev. 77:766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.12765.
  • Nguyen Quang V, Kammeir DH. 2002. Changes in the political economy of Vietnam and their impacts on the built environment of Hanoi. Cities. 19(6):373–388. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00068-9.
  • Offner J-M. 1993. Le développement des réseaux techniques: un modèle générique. Flux. 13(14):11–18. doi:10.3406/flux.1993.960.
  • Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  • Ostrom E. 1996. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Dev. 24(6):1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
  • Rao V. 2015. Infra-city: speculations on flux and history in infrastructure-making. In: Graham S, McFarlane C, editors. Infrastructural lives. London: Routledge; p. p. 39–58.
  • Schramm S. 2011. Semicentralised water supply and treatment: options for the dynamic urban area of Hanoi. Vietnam J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 13(2):285–314. doi:10.1142/S1464333211003882.
  • Schramm S. 2014. Stadt im Fluss. Die Abwasserentsorgung Hanois im Lichte sozialer und räumlicher Transformationen [City in the river. The sanitation of Hanoi in the light of social and spatial transformations]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
  • Schramm S 2016a. Hanoi’s septic tanks – technology of a city in flow in the late nineteenth century and today. In Hein C (ed.) International Planning History Society Proceedings, 17th IPHS Conference, History-Urbanism-Resilience, Tu Delft 17–21 July 2016. Delft: IPHS, p. 345.
  • Schramm S. 2016b. Flooding the sanitary city. City. 20(1):32–51. doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1125717.
  • Schramm S, Contreras LW. 2017. Fragmented landscapes of water supply in suburban Hanoi. Habitat Int. 61:64–74. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.02.002.
  • Silver J. 2014. Incremental infrastructures: material improvisation and social collaboration across post-colonial Accra. Urban Geogr. 35(6):788–804. doi:10.1080/02723638.2014.933605.
  • Tran HA. 2015. Urban space production in transition: the cases of the new urban areas of Hanoi. Urban Pol Res. 33(1):79–97. doi:10.1080/08111146.2014.967393.
  • Turner J, Fichter R. 1972. Freedom to build: dweller control of the housing process. New York (NY): Collier-Macmillan.
  • van Vliet BJM. 2012. Sustainable innovation in network-bound systems: implications for the consumption of water, waste water and electricity services. J Environ Policy Plan. 14(3):263–278. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.702563.
  • van Vliet BJM, Chappels H, Shove E. 2005. Infrastructure of consumption: environmental innovations in the utility of industries. London: Earthscan.
  • Watson V. 2014. Co-production and collaboration in planning – the difference. Plann Theor Pract. 15(1):62–76. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.866266.
  • Zérah M-H. 2000. Household strategies for coping with unreliable water supplies: the case of Delhi. Habitat Int. 24(3):295–307. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(99)00045-4.