1,241
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Technology in Urban Service Co-Production and Guest Editors: Giuseppe Faldi, Marco Ranzato and Luisa Moretto

Co-Production or Contested Production? Complex Arrangements of Actors, Infrastructure, and Practices in Everyday Water Provisioning in a Small Town in India

&
Pages 196-208 | Received 07 Aug 2019, Accepted 03 Nov 2020, Published online: 21 Dec 2020

References

  • Ahlers R, Cleaver F, Rusca M, Schwartz K. 2014. Informal space in the Urban waterscape: disaggregation and Co-production of water services. Water Altern. 7(1):1–14.
  • Allen A, Hofmann P, Mukherjee J, Walnycki A. 2017. Water trajectories through non-networked infrastructure: insights from peri-urban Dar es Salaam, Cochabamba and Kolkata. Urban Res Pract. 10(1):22–42. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1197306.
  • Anand N. 2011. PRESSURE: the politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Public Culture. 26(4):542–564.
  • Baiocchi G. 2003. Participation, activism, and politics: the porto alegre experiment. In: Fung A, Wright EO, editors. Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso Press; p. 45–76.
  • Bakker K. 2012. Water: political, biopolitical, material. Soc Stud Sci. 42(4):616–623. doi:10.1177/0306312712441396.
  • Björkman L. 2015. Pipe politics, contested waters: embedded infrastructures of Millenial Mumbai. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  • Bovaird T. 2007. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services. Public Adm Rev. 67:846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
  • Chowdhury UK, Biswas BK, Roy Chowdhury T, Samanta G, Mandal BK, Basu GC, Chakraborti D, Lodh D, Saha KC, Mukherjee SK. 2000. Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India. Environ Health Perspect. 108(5):393–397. May. doi:10.1289/ehp.00108393.
  • Cornea N. 2019. Territorialising control in urban West Bengal: social clubs and everyday governance in the spaces between state and party. EPC: Politics Space. 38(2):312–328.
  • Cornea N, Zimmer A, Véron R. 2016. Ponds, power and institutions: the everyday governance of accessing Urban water bodies in a small Bengali City. Int J Urban Reg Res. 40(2):395–409. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12377.
  • Coutard O, Rutherford J, Eds. 2016. Beyond the Networked City: infrastructure reconfigurations and urban change in the North and South. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  • de Bercegol R. 2017. Small towns and decentralisation in India: Urban local bodies in the making. New Delhi: Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd.
  • Directorate of Census Operations, West Bengal. 2011. Census of India 2011, series-20, part Xii-B, district census handbook, south 24 parganas, village and townwise primary census abstract (PCA). West Bengal:Directorate of Census Operations.
  • Donner H. 2011. Locating activist spaces: the neighbourhood as a source and site of Urban activism in 1970s Calcutta. Cultural Dyn. 23:21–40. doi:10.1177/0921374011403352.
  • Jaglin S. 2014. Regulating service delivery in Southern cities: rethinking urban heterogeneity. In: Parnell S, Oldfield S, editors. The routledge handbook on cities of the global south. London and New York: Routledge; p. 434.
  • Joshi A, Moore M. 2004. Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. J Dev Studies. 40(4):31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184.
  • Kadfak A. 2019. Intermediary politics in a Peri-Urban Village in Mangaluru, India. Forum Dev Stud. 46(2):277–298. doi:10.1080/08039410.2018.1529700.
  • Kjellén M, McGranahan G. 2006. Informal water vendors and the Urban poor. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
  • Meehan K. 2014. Tool-power: water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum. 57:215–224. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.08.005.
  • Mitlin D. 2008. With and beyond the state – co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environ Urban. 20(2):339–360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117.
  • Mitlin D (2018, October 24). Co-production in urban areas: evolving form, enduring presence. IIED. https://www.iied.org/co-production-urban-areas-evolving-form-enduring-presence
  • Mitlin D, Bartlett S. 2018. Editorial: co-production - key ideas. Environ Urban. 30(2):355–366. doi:10.1177/0956247818791931.
  • Monstadt J, Schramm S. 2015. Changing sanitary infrastructure in Hanoi: hybrid topologies. In: Coutard O, Rutherford J, editors. Beyond the Networked City: infrastructure reconfigurations and Urban change in the North and South. London: Routledge; p. 26–50.
  • Moretto L, Faldi G, Ranzato M, Rosati FN, Boozi PI, Teller J. 2018. Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the global South. Environ Urban. 30(2):425–443. doi:10.1177/0956247818790652.
  • Moretto L, Ranzato M. 2017. A socio-natural standpoint to understand coproduction of water, energy and waste services. Urban Res Pract. 10(1):1–21. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1201528.
  • Ostrom E. 1996. Crossing the Great Divide: coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Dev. 24(6):1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
  • Ranganathan M. 2014. ‘Mafias’ in the waterscape: urban informality and everyday public authority in Bangalore. Water Altern. 7(1):89–105.
  • Schindler S, Nguyen ND, Barongo DG. 2019. Transformative top-down planning in a small African city: how residents in Bagamoyo, Tanzania connect with a city in motion. EPC: Politics Space C. 1–18. doi:10.1177/2399654419864605
  • Tiwale S, Rusca M, Zwarteveen M. 2018. The power of pipes: mapping urban water inequities through the material properties of networked water infrastructures - The case of Lilongwe, Malawi. Water Altern. 11(2):314–335.