Exploring appropriate socio-technical arrangements for the co-production of landslide risk management strategies in informal neighbourhoods in Colombia and Brazil

References

• Aguilar-Barajas I, Sisto NP, Ramirez AI, Magaña-Rueda V. 2019. Building urban resilience and knowledge co-production in the face of weather hazards: flash floods in the Monterrey Metropolitan Area (Mexico). Environ Sci Policy. 99:37–47. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaldía de Medellín. 2013. Formulación de determinantes del modelo de ocupación [Development of criteria for land use model]. Departamento Administrativo de Planeación Convenio No 46000048673. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Allen A. 2012. Water provision for and by the peri-urban poor: public-community partnerships or citizens co-production? In: Vojnovic I, editor. Sustainability: a global urban context. East Lansig: Michigan University Press; p. 209–340.
   Google Scholar
• Allen A, Griffin L, Johnson C. 2017. Environmental justice and urban resilience in the global south. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson MG, Holcombe EA. 2013. Community-based landslide risk reduction: managing disasters in small steps. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Holcombe L 2006. Purpose-driven public sector 1580 reform: the need for within- government capacity build for the management of slope stability in communities in the Caribbean. Environ Manage. 37(1):15–29. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0351-z.
   Google Scholar
• Batley R, Mcloughlin C. 2010. Engagement with non-state service providers in fragile states: reconciling state-building and service delivery. Dev Policy Rev. 28(2):131–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00478.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnach M, Craps M, Dewulf A. 2017. Including indigenous peoples in climate change mitigation: addressing issues of scale, knowledge and power. Clim Change. 140(1):19–32. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1280-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto V, Neves Alves S. 2018. Intersectionality challenges for the co-production of urban services: notes for a theoretical and methodological agenda. Environ Urban. 30(2):367–386. doi:10.1177/0956247818790208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers R. 1993. Challenging the professions: frontiers for rural development. London: ITDG.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers R. 1994. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev. 22(7):953–969. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitekwe-Biti B. 2018. Co-producing Windhoek: the contribution of the Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia. Environ Urban. 30(2):387–406. doi:10.1177/0956247818785784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CISP, Alcaldía de Medellín [Mayor’s Office]. 2015. Plan de Desarrollo Local Comuna 1 Popular. Nuestra acción política y social [Local development plan comuna 1 popular. Our political and social action]; p 39. Medellín (Colombia). Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• [DAGRD] Departamento Administrativo para la Gestión de Riesgo de Desastres de Medellín [Administrative Department for Disaster Risk Management in Medellin]. 2015. Plan Municipal para la Gestión de Riesgo de Desastres – PMGRD [Municipal plan for disaster risk management]. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Dapena Rivera LR. 2006. Núcleos de Vida Ciudadana: racionalidades y coyunturas en la gestión de un proyecto urbano [Citizens’ life centres: rationalities and opportunities in the management of an urban project]. Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser A. 2017. The missing politics of urban vulnerability: the state and the co-production of climate risk. Environ Plan A. 49(12):2835–2852. doi:10.1177/0308518X17732341.
   Google Scholar
• Freire P. 1972. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Geilfus F 1997. From tree-haters to tree-farmers: promoting farm forestry in the Dominican Republic. Rural Development Forestry Network. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ISDR-ICL. 2015. ISDR-ICL sendai partnerships 2015–2025 for global promotion of understanding and reducing landslide disaster risk. Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Moore M. 2004. Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. J Dev Stud. 40(4):31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katíos, SIMPAD, Secretaria Medio Ambiente [Environment Secretariat] (2012). Plan de Emergencia Comuna 1 Popular [Emergency plan comuna 1 popular]. Medellín (Colombia). Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis S, MacTaggart R, Nixon R. 2014. The action research planner: doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kenis A. 2018. Post-politics contested: why multiple voices on climate change do not equal politicisation. Environ Plan C. 37(5):831–848.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence RJ, Després C. 2004. Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures. 36(4):297–405. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malalgoda CI, Amaratunga RDG, Pathirage CP 2010. Role of local governments in disaster risk reduction. The Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (COBRA). Dauphine Université (Paris). 2–3 September.
   Google Scholar
• Maskrey A 1984. Community based disaster mitigation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Disaster Mitigation Program Implementation: Ocho Rios, Jamaica, 12–16 November. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Center for International Development Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Maskrey A. 1989. Community based disaster mitigation. UK: Oxfam Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Maskrey A. 2011. Revisiting community-based disaster risk management. Environ Hazards. 10(1):42–45. doi:10.3763/ehaz.2011.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGranahan G 2013. Community-driven sanitation improvement in deprived urban neighbourhoods. Meeting the challenges of local collective action, co-production, affordability and a trans-sectoral approach. Research Report. SHARE.
   Google Scholar
• Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M. 2016. Defining urban resilience: a review. Landscape Urban Plan. 147:38–49. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses, D.H.L., Cañadas, S.H ., 2018. Altos de la Estancia: An Applied Project of Risk Governance in Colombia, in: Leal Filho, W., Esteves de Freitas, L. (Eds.), Climate Change Adaptation in Latin America: Managing Vulnerability, Fostering Resilience. Springer, pp. 477–499.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin D. 2008. With and beyond the state – co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environ Urban. 20(2):339–360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin D, Bartlett S. 2018. Editorial: co-production – key ideas. Environ Urban. 30(2):355–366. doi:10.1177/0956247818791931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretto L. 2014. Assessing urban governance: the case of water service co-production in Venezuela. Brussels etc.: P.I.E Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Moretto L, Ranzato M. 2017. A socio-natural standpoint to understand coproduction of water, energy and waste services. Urban Res Pract. 10(1):1–21. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1201528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser C, Stein A. 2011. A methodological guideline for implementing urban participatory climate change adaptation appraisals. Environ Urban. 23(2):463–486. doi:10.1177/0956247811418739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansardi P. 2012. Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power? J Political Power. 5(1):73–89. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.658278.
   Google Scholar
• Petcou C, Petrescu D. 2015. R-URBAN or how to co-produce a resilient city. Ephemera. 15:249–262.
   Google Scholar
• Petley D. 2012. Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology. 40(10):927–930. doi:10.1130/G33217.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A, Fry P, Gurung GS, Schneider F, Speranza CI, Kiteme B, Boillat S, Serrano E, et al. 2010. Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy. 37(4):267–281. doi:10.3152/030234210X496628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell M. 2013. To inhabit well: counterhegemonic movements and the right to the city. Urban Geogr. 34(4):560–574. doi:10.1080/02723638.2013.790638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith H, Jenkins P. 2015. Trans-disciplinary research and strategic urban expansion planning in a context of weak institutional capacity: case study of Huambo, Angola. Habitat Int. 46:244–251. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith H, Coupé F, Garcia-Ferrari S, Rivera H, Castro Mera W E . 2020a. Toward negotiated mitigation of landslide risks in informal settlements: reflections from a pilot experience in Medellín, Colombia. Ecology and Society. 25(1):19. doi:10.5751/ES-11337-250119.
   Google Scholar
• Smith H, Garcia-Ferrari S, Medero G M, Rivera H, Coupé F, Caballero H, Castro W, Abiko A, Marinho F, Ferreira K . 2020b. Learning from co-produced landslide risk mitigation strategies in low-income settlements in Medellín (Colombia) and São Paulo (Brazil). In Ley A, Rahman A U, Fokdal J, editors. Housing and Human Settlements in a World of Change. Bielefeld: Transcript. doi:10.14361/9783839449424-013.
   Google Scholar
• Stein A, Moser C, Vance I. 2018. Asset planning for climate change adaptation in poor neighbourhoods of Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington US.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson F, Petrescu D. 2016. Co-producing neighbourhood resilience. Build Res Inf. 44(7):695–702. doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1213865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E. 2010. Impossible sustainability and the post-political condition. In: Cerreta M, Concilio G, Monno V, editors. Making strategies in spatial planning. Urban and landscape perspectives. Vol. 9 (pp. 185–205). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3106-8_11.
   Google Scholar
• UNISDR. 2010. Strategy outline for the 2010-2011 ISDR world disaster reduction campaign on building resilient cities, addressing urban risk. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction – ISDR. [Accessed May 2020]. Available from: www.unisdr.org/…/campaigns/campaign20102011/…/230_CampaignStrategy.doc
   Google Scholar
• URBAM, Harvard Design School. 2012. Re Habitar La Ladera: shifting ground [Re-inhabit the hillside: shifting ground], Universidad EAFIT, Medellín. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• von Kotze A, Holloway A 1996. Reducing risk: participatory learning activities for disaster mitigation in Southern Africa. Oxfam library. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10546/122988
   Google Scholar
• Wamsler C 2007. Managing urban disaster risk. PhD Thesis. Lund (Sweden): Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Wisner B. 1979. Flood prevention and mitigation in the People’s Republic of Mozambique. Disasters. 3(3):293–306. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1979.tb00155.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. 2003. At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerabilities and disasters. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yu C, Farrelly M, Brown R 2011. Co-production and the governance of decentralised stormwater systems. Report for the Centre for Water Sensitive Cities. Monash University, November.
   Google Scholar