A method to measure perceived tenure security in low-income settlements in India

References

• Angel S. 1983. Land tenure for the urban poor. In: Angel S, Archer R, Tamphiphat S, editors. Land for housing the poor. Singapore: Select Books; p. 110-142.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee B. 2002. Security of tenure in Indian cities. In: Durand-Lasserve A, Royston L, editors. Holding Their Ground: secure Tenure for the Urban Poor in Developing Countries. London: Earthscan Publications Limited; p. 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Bhan G, Anand G, Harish S. 2014. Policy Approaches to Affordable Housing in Urban India: problems and Possibilities. Bangalore: Indian Institute for Human Settlements.
   Google Scholar
• Bhan G, Goswami A, Revi A. 2017. The intent to reside: residence in the auto-constructed city. In Bhan G, Srinivas S, Watson V, editors. The Routledge companion to planning in the Global South. Routledge. p. 255-263.
   Google Scholar
• Boonyabancha S. 2019. On ‘being collective’: a patchwork conversation with Somsook Boonyabancha on poverty, collective land tenure and Thailand’s Baan Mankong programme. In: Pérez-Castro B, editor. Radical Housing Journal. p. 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess R. 1982. Self-help housing advocacy: a curious form of radicalism: a critique of the work of John FC Turner. In: Ward P, editor. Self-help housing: a critique. London: Mansell; p. 55–97.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Urban Equity. 2010. Land Tenure Manual for Slum-free Cities. Ahmedabad:CEPT University.
   Google Scholar
• Das AK, Takahashi LM. 2009. Evolving institutional arrangements, scaling up, and sustainability: emerging issues in participatory slum upgrading in Ahmedabad, India. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 29(2):213–232. doi:10.1177/0739456X09348613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Soto H. 2000. The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere. New York: Civitas Books.
   Google Scholar
• Desai R, Mahadevia D, Sanghvi S, Vyas S, Malek R, Malek M. 2016. Bombay Hotel: urban Planning, Governance and Everyday Conflict and Violence in a Muslim Locality on the Peripheries of Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad: Centre for Urban Equity.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser N. Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, recognition, participation. Berlin: WZB discussion paper.91998
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein S. 2014. The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 18(1):1–18. doi:10.1080/12265934.2013.834643.
   Google Scholar
• Ghertner DA. 2012. Nuisance Talk and the Propriety of Property: middle Class Discourses of a Slum-Free Delhi. Antipode. 44(4):1161–1187. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00956.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert A. 2002. On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando de Soto: what difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review. 24(1):1–20. doi:10.3828/idpr.24.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habitat for Humanity International. 2017. Strengthening land tenure security for urban poverty reduction in Asia-Pacific. Manila:GLTN.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 1993. Class relations, social justice and the politics of difference. In: Place and the Politics of Identity. p. 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu A. 2002. Tenure security, housing investment and environmental improvement. In: Payne G, editor. Land, Rights and Innovation: improving tenure security for the urban poor. London. ITDG Publishing; p. 136–157.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H. 1968. The right to the city. Vol. 3. Paris: Anthropos.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen C. 2013. The Social Tenure Domain Model: a Pro-Poor Land Tool. Copenhagen: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG).
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevia D. 2010. Tenure security and urban social protection links: india. IDS Bull. 41(4):52–62. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00152.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• mRolnik R. 2020. Building territories to protect life and not profit: the RHJ in conversation with Raquel Rolnik. In: Lancione M, editor. Radical Housing Journal. p.139–147
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura S. 2016. Revealing invisible rules in slums: the nexus between perceived tenure security and housing investment. Habitat Int. 53:151–162. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel K. 2016. Encountering the state through legal tenure security: perspectives from a low income resettlement scheme in urban India. Land Use Policy. 58:102–113. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne G. 2001. Urban land tenure policy options: titles or rights? Habitat Int. 25(3):415–429. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(01)00014-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne G. Land tenure and property rights: An introduction. Habitat International. 28(2):167-1792003
   Google Scholar
• Payne G. 2020. Options for intervention: increasing tenure security for community development and urban transformation. In: Communities, Land and Social Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Payne G, Durand-Lasserve A, Rakodi C. 2009. The limits of land titling and home ownership. Environ Urban. 21(2):443–462. doi:10.1177/0956247809344364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimple M, John L. 2002. Security of Tenure: mumbai’s Experience. In: Holding their ground: secure land tenure for the urban poor in developing countries. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Risbud N. 2002. Policies for tenure security in Delhi. Holding their ground: secure land tenure for the urban poor in developing countries. London: Earthscan; p. 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rolnik R. 2019. Uban Warfare: housing under the empire of finance. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Turner J. 1968. Housing priorities, settlement patterns, and urban development in modernizing countries. J Am Inst Plann. 34(6):354–363. doi:10.1080/01944366808977562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner J. 1972. Housing as a verb. In: Turner J, Fichter R, editors. Freedom to build: dweller control of the housing process. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• UKAid. 2015. A Land Indicator for the SDGs. Land Policy Bulletin. 2.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCAP and UN-Habitat. 2008. Land: a crucial element in housing the urban poor. In Housing the Poor in Asian cities.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2008. Secure Land Rights for All. Nairobi:GLTN Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder J-L. 2009. Legal Tenure Security, Perceived Tenure Security and Housing Improvement in Buenos Aires: an Attempt towards Integration. Int J Urban Reg Res. 33(1):126–146. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00833.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder J-L. 2010. What tenure security? The case for a tripartite view. Land Use Policy. 27(2):449–456. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley A. 1987. The relationship between tenure legalization and housing improvements: evidence from Mexico City. Dev Change. 18(3):463–481. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1987.tb00281.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley A. 2002. Private or Public: debating the Meaning of Tenure Legalization. Int J Urban Reg Res. 26(3):449–461. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein L. 2014. The durable slum: dharavi and the right to stay put in globalizing Mumbai Vol. 23. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 1993. Housing: enabling markets to work (English). In: A World Bank policy paper. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Young IM. 1990. Displacing the distributive paradigm. In: Young IM, editor. Justice and the Politics of Difference New Jersey. Princeton University Press; p. 15–38.
   Google Scholar