Territorial peace: land governance and sustainable peacebuilding

References

• Abuza Z, Lischin L. 2020. In: The challenges facing the Philippines‘ Bangsamoro autonomous region at one year; 468. Washington, DC: United States Institute of peace. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/20200610-sr_468-the_challenges_facing_the_philippines_bangsamoro_autonomous_region_at_one_year-sr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Acuerdo Final. 2016. Acuerdo final para la terminación del conflicto y la construcción de una paz estable y duradera. Available at: https://www.jep.gov.co/Marco%20Normativo/Normativa_v2/01%20ACUERDOS/Texto-Nuevo-Acuerdo-Final.pdf?csf=1&e=0fpYA0
   Google Scholar
• Agencia para la Reincorporación y la Normalización. 2021. Informe de Seguimiento a La Implementación de Los PDET. https://centralpdet.renovacionterritorio.gov.co/documentos/tercer-informe-de-implementacion-vigencia-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Agencia para la Reincorporación y la Normalización. n.d. Route of Reincorporation. https://www.reincorporacion.gov.co/es/reincorporacion/ruta-de-reincorporaci%C3%B3n
   Google Scholar
• Agencia Prensa Rural. 2017. ‘The PDET Must Start from the Recognition of the Peasant Reserve Zones Constituted and in the Process of Being Constituted’ Social Organizations. https://prensarural.org/spip/spip.php?article22082.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar M, Sierra J, Ramirez W, Vargas O, Calle Z, Vargas W, Murcia C, Aronson J, Barrera Cataño JI. 2015. Toward a post-conflict Colombia: restoring to the future. Restoration Ecol. 23(1):4–6. doi:10.1111/rec.12172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahumada C. 2020. La implementación del Acuerdo de paz en Colombia: entre la “paz territorial” y la disputa por el territorio. Problemas del Desarrollo Revista Latinoamericana de Economía. 51(200):25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Alden Wily L. 2009. Tackling land tenure in the emergency to development transition in post-conflict states: from restitution to reform. In: Pantuliano S, editors. Practical Action Publishing. Uncharted Territory: Land, Conflict and Humanitarian Action: Bourton-on-Dunsmore, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2012. Colombia: the victims and land restitution law: an Amnesty Intenrational analysis. London, UK: Amnesty International Publications 2012; 24. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4f99029f2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Andaya R. 2021. Transformation through Normalization: delineating Justice in the Bangsamoro Peace Process. Hiroshima Peace Res J. 8:133–157.
   Google Scholar
• Annex on Normalization. 2014. http://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/PH_140125_AnnexNormalization.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Annex on Power Sharing. 2014. https://ucdpged.uu.se/peaceagreements/fulltext/Phi%2020131208.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arias MA, Ibáñez AM, Zambrano, A. 2014. Agricultural Production Amid Conflict: The Effects of Shocks, Uncertainty, and Governance of Non-State Armed Actors Documentos CEDE 011005 (Universidad de los Andes - CEDE).
   Google Scholar
• Arnot CD, Luckert MK, Boxall PC. 2011. What Is Tenure Security? Conceptual Implications for Empirical Analysis. Land Econ. 87(2):297–311. doi:10.3368/le.87.2.297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron R. 1984. Paix et guerre entre les nations. Calmann-Levy.
   Google Scholar
• Arrubla KS. 2003. Economía y nación: una breve historia de Colombia. Bogotá: Norma.
   Google Scholar
• Augustinus C, Barry MB. 2006. Land management strategy formulation in post-conflict societies. Survey Rev. 38(302):668–681. doi:10.1179/sre.2006.38.302.668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustinus C, Ombretta Tempra O. 2021. ‘Fit-for-Purpose land administration in violent conflict settings. Land. 10(2):139. doi:10.3390/land10020139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball N. 2001. The challenge of rebuilding war-torn societies. In: Crocker CA, Hampson FO, Aall P editors. Turbolent peace: the challenge of managing international conflict. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press; 719–736.
   Google Scholar
• Bangsamoro Planning and Development Authority. 2020. https://bpda.bangsamoro.gov.ph/
   Google Scholar
• BARMM Authorities, UNHCR, & JIPS. 2021. Profiling of internal displacement in the island provinces of the bangsamoro autonomous region in muslim Mindanao (BARMM).
   Google Scholar
• Bautista S. 2017. Contribuciones a la fundamentación conceptual de paz territorial. Revista Ciudad Pazando. 10(1):100–110. doi:10.14483/2422278X.11639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell C. 2010. Contemporary peace agreements and accords. In: Young NJ, editor. The Oxford international encyclopaedia of peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195334685.001.0001/acref-9780195334685-e-142
   Google Scholar
• Berry RA. 2017. Reflections on injustice, inequality and land conflict in Colombia. Can J Latin Am Caribbean Studies/Revue Canadienne Des Études Latino-Américaines et Caraïbes. 42(3):277–297. doi:10.1080/08263663.2017.1378400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borja M. 2017. Perspectivas territoriales del acuerdo de paz. Análisis Político. 30(90):61–76. doi:10.15446/anpol.v30n90.68556.
   Google Scholar
• Borras SM Jr., Franco JC. 2010. Contemporary discourses and contestations around pro-poor land policies and land governance. J Agrarian Change. 10(1):1–32. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutros-Ghali B. 1992. An agenda for peace. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Buendia RG. 2006. The Mindanao conflict in the. Philippines: Ethno-Religious War or Economic Conflict?; p. 30.
   Google Scholar
• Cairo H, Oslender U, Piazzini C, Ríos J, Koopman S, Montoya V, Rodríguez F, Zambrano L. 2018. Territorial peace”: the emergence of a concept in Colombia’s peace negotiations. Geopolitics. 23(2):464–488. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1425110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda JA. 2016. El posacuerdo en Colombia y los nuevos retos de la seguridad. Cuadernos de estrategia América Latina: nuevos retos en seguridad y defensa. 181:195–224.
   Google Scholar
• Chetail V. ed. 2009. Post-conflict peacebuilding: a lexicon. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Congreso de Colombia. 2011. Ley 1448 de 2011. Por la cual se dictan medidas de atención, asistencia y reparación integral a las víctimas del conflicto armado interno y se dictan otras disposiciones. https://www.unidadvictimas.gov.co/sites/default/files/documentosbiblioteca/ley-1448-de-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Congress of the Republic of Colombia. 2011. Law 1448 of 2011. Official Gazette 48096 of June 10, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Daudelin J. 2003. Land and violence in post-conflict situations. Ottawa, Canada: The North-South Institute and The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Dayton B, Kriesberg L. 2009. Conflict transformation and peacebuilding: moving from violence to sustainable peace. London, UK: Routledge; 288.
   Google Scholar
• de Kraker J. 2017. Social learning for resilience in social–ecological systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 28:100–107. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enemark S, Clifford Bell K, Lemmen C, McLaren R. 2014. Fit-for-Purpose land administration. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Federation of Surveyors. FIG Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Escallón JMV. 2021. The historical relationship between agrarian reforms and internal armed conflicts: relevant factors for the Colombian post-conflict scenario. Land Use Policy. 101. 105138. accessed 2021 Feb 1. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajardo-Heyward P. 2018. Colombia 2017: entre La Implementación y La Incertidumbre. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago). 38(2):233–258. doi:10.4067/s0718-090x2018000200233.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher D. 2016. Freeze-framing territory: time and its significance in land governance. Space and Polity. 20(2):212–225. doi:10.1080/13562576.2016.1174557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, & Agencia Nacional de Tierras. 2019. Las Zonas de Reserva Campesina Retos y Experiencias Significativas En Su Implementación.
   Google Scholar
• Forster R . 2019. Peace agreements. In: Romaniuk S, editor. The Palgrave encyclopedia of global security studies. Edinburgh, UK: Cham, Palgrave MacMillan; p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung J. 1969. Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. J Peace Res. 6(3):167–191. doi:10.1177/002234336900600301.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung J. 1975. Three approaches to peace: peacekeeping, peacemaking and peacebuilding.In Galtung J, editor. Peace, War and Defense –Essays in Peace Research. Vol. 2. Copenhague: Christian Heljers; p. 282–304.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung J. 1996. Peace by peaceful means: peace and conflict, development, and civilization. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung J 2003. Paz Por Medios Pacificos. Paz y Conflicto, Desarrollo y Civilizacion. Red Gernika 7, Bakeaz & Gernika Gogoratuz.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung J. 2009. Theories of conflict: definitions, dimensions, negations, and formations. Oslo: Transcend.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia Corrales LM, Avila H, Gutierrez RR. 2019. Land-Use and socioeconomic changes related to armed conflicts: a Colombian Regional Case Study. Environ Sci Policy. 97:116–124. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Godos J, Wiig H. 2018. Ideals and realities of restitution: the Colombian land restitution programme. J Human Rights Practice. 10(1):40–57. doi:10.1093/jhuman/huy006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garstka GJ. 2010. Post-conflict urban planning: the regularization process of an informal neighborhood in Kosova/o. Habitat Int. 34(1):86–95. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch NP. 1998. Armed Conflict and The Environment: A Critique of the Literature. J Peace Res. 35(3):381–400. doi:10.1177/0022343398035003007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of the Philippines & Moro Islamic Liberation Front. 2013. Annex on Power Sharing on the Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro.
   Google Scholar
• Guarnieri V. 2003. Food aid and livelihoods: Challenges and opportunities in complex emergencies. Food Security in Complex Emergencies: building policy frameworks to address longer-term programming challenges. 23-25 September, 2003. Tivoli, Italy FAO International Workshop. Rome, Italy: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Guereña A. 2017. Radiografía De La Desigualdad: Lo Que Nos Dice El Último Censo Agropecuario Sobre La Distribución De La Tierra En Colombia. Bogota‘: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman LR, Holá B. 2019. Punishment in negotiated transitions: the Case of the Colombian Peace Agreement with the Farc-Ep. Int Crim Law Rev. 19(1):127–159. doi:10.1163/15718123-01901006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbolzheimer K. 2015a. Multiple paths to peace: public participation for transformative and sustainable peace processes. Kult-Ur. 2(3):139–156. doi:10.6035/Kult-ur.2015.2.3.7.
   Google Scholar
• Herbolzheimer K 2015b. The peace process in Mindanao, the Philippines: evolution and lessons learned. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth C. 2014. A framework for assessing security of tenure in post-conflict contexts. University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins C. 2009. Linking Broad Constellations of Ideas: Transitional Justice, Land Tenure Reform, and Development. de Greiff, Pablo, Duthie, Roger. Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections. New York, USA: Social Science Research Council; p. 332–374.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2020. Southern Philippines: tackling clan politics in the Bangsamoro. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/philippines/306-southern-philippines-tackling-clan-politics-bangsamoro.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen S. 2007. The privatisation of home and hope: return, reforms, and the foreign intervention in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Dialect Anthropol. 30(3–4):177–199. doi:10.1007/s10624-007-9005-x.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspars S, O’Callaghan S. 2010. Livelihoods and protection in situations of protracted conflict. Disasters. 34(s2):S165–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01152.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joshi M, Quinn JM. 2017. Implementing the peace: the aggregate implementation of comprehensive peace agreements and peace duration after intrastate armed conflict. Br J Polit Sci. 47(4):869–892. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapahi AD, Tañada G. 2018. The Bangsamoro identity struggle and the Bangsamoro basic law as the path to peace. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses. 10(7):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lambourne W. 2008. Transitional justice and peacebuilding after mass violence. Int J Transit Justice. 3(1):28–48. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijn037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambourne W, Rodriguez Carreon V. 2016. Engendering transitional justice: a transformative approach to building peace and attaining human rights for women. Human Rights Rev. 17(1):71–93. doi:10.1007/s12142-015-0376-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederach JP. 1998. Building peace: sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington: United States Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• León F, Dávila J. 2020. Catastro para la paz: Tensiones, problemas, posibilidades. Documentos Dejusticia 59. Bogotá: Editorial Dejusticia.
   Google Scholar
• Le Billon P, Roa-García MC, López-Granada AR. 2020. Territorial peace and gold mining in Colombia: local peacebuilding, bottom-up development and the defence of territories. Conflict, Security & Development. 20(3):303–333. doi:10.1080/14678802.2020.1741937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Cortés P 2013. The victims and land restitution Law in Colombia in context: an analysis of the contradictions between the Agrarian model and compensation for the victims. FDCL, TNI, 2013. https://www.tni.org/files/download/martinez-victims-law-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martínez MA 2020, October 15. Radiografía de la violencia contra los líderes asesinados en Colombia. Indepaz. http://www.indepaz.org.co/radiografia-de-la-violencia-contra-los-lideres-asesinados-en-colombia/
   Google Scholar
• Maulana N 2020. BARMM deals out land holdings to Moros. Manilastandard.Net, https://manilastandard.net/mobile/article/335677
   Google Scholar
• Mindanao Peoples’ Caucus. 2020a. Rapid midterm review of the Bangsamoro transition period. The governance/political legal track. Mindanao Peoples’ Caucus, funded by UN Development Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Mindanao Peoples’ Caucus. 2020b. Rapid midterm review of the Bangsamoro transition period. The normalization track report. Mindanao Peoples’ Caucus, funded by UN Development Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Misión de Observación Electoral. 2021. Liderazgos Sociales Siguen Siendo Los Más Vulnerados En Colombia: MOE MOE - Misión de Observación Electoral (blog), [accessed 2021 May 13]. https://www.moe.org.co/en/liderazgos-sociales-siguen-siendo-los-mas-vulnerados-en-colombia-moe/.
   Google Scholar
• Montalbo LG 2021. the two track of the Bangsamoro peace process and the extension transition question. International Center for Innovation, Transformation and Excellence in Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Montes C. 2018. La corrupción en el sector ambiental: un detrimento contra el patrimonio natural. In: Henao J, editor. Corrupción en Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia; p. 79–109.
   Google Scholar
• Montiel CJ, Rodil RB, de Guzman JM. 2012. The Moro struggle and the challenge to peace building in Mindanao, Southern Philippines. In: Landis D, Albert RD, editors. Handbook of ethnic conflict. Boston, MA: Springer US; p. 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Murcia J 2021, September 22. JEP ordenó nuevas medidas para la protección de excombatientes por la creciente ola de violencia. Asuntos Legales. https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/actualidad/jep-ordeno-nuevas-medidas-para-la-proteccion-de-excombatientes-por-la-creciente-ola-de-violencia-3236103
   Google Scholar
• Musahara H, Huggins C 2004. Land reform, land scarcity and post-conflict reconstruction: a case study of Rwanda. From the Ground Up, 78.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Refugee Council & Displacement Solutions. 2018. Housing, land and property rights and peace agreements: Guidance for Myanmar peace process.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Refugee Council & International Federation of Red Cross. 2016. The Importance of Addressing Housing, Land and Property (HLP) Challenges in Humanitarian Response.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process. 2021. welleFirst Quarter Accomplishment Report FY 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Fricska S, Wehrmann B, UN FAO & United Nations Human Settlements Programme. 2009. Towards improved land governance. UN-HABITAT.
   Google Scholar
• Paredes O. 2015. Indigenous vs. native: negotiating the place of Lumads in the Bangsamoro homeland. Asian Ethnicity. 16(2):166–185. doi:10.1080/14631369.2015.1003690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PBI Colombia. 2018. Campesino reserve zones, [accessed 2018 Dec 12] https://pbicolombia.org/2018/01/12/campesino-reserve-zones/
   Google Scholar
• Peace Accords Matrix, Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies & Keough School of Global Affairs. 2021. Five years of peace agreement implementation in Colombia: achievements, challenges, and opportunities to increase implementation levels, December 2016 - October 2021. Notre Dame (IN and Bogotá, Colombia): doi:10.7274/0c483j36025
   Google Scholar
• Peña J 2019. Paz territorial: conectando imaginación moral e imaginación geográfica. Documento de Trabajo 5-2019. Instituto Colombo-Alemán para la Paz – CAPAZ.
   Google Scholar
• Plazas-Díaz FA. 2017. Historia reciente y enseñanza del conflicto armado reciente y actual de Colombia en colegios y universidades del país. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos. 13(1):179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard MF. 2016. Contesting land rights in a post-conflict environment: tenure reform and dispute resolution in the centre-West region of Côte d’Ivoire. Land Use Policy. 54:264–275. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procuraduría General de la Nación. 2020. Procuraduría alertó sobre la forma desarticulada en la que se avanza en la implementación del Acuerdo de Paz. Available at: https://www.procuraduria.gov.co/portal/Procuraduria-alerto-sobre-la-forma-desarticulada-en-la-que-se-avanza-en-la-implementacion-del-Acuerdo-de-Paz-.news
   Google Scholar
• Radio Nacional de Colombia. 2018. Agencia de Desarrollo Rural creó grupo especial para atender el posconflicto. https://www.radionacional.co/cultura/agencia-de-desarrollo-rural-creo-grupo-especial-para-atender-el-posconflicto
   Google Scholar
• Ramos L. 2003. La modernización del catastro colombiano. Revista de Ingeniería de la Universidad de los Andes. 18:156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Rettberg A. 2012. Construcción de paz en Colombia: contexto y balance. En Construcción de paz en Colombia, comp. Angelika Rettberg. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond O. 2012. A post-liberal peace. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robustelli T 2018. Challenges to Land Reform in Colombia. New America (blog), [accessed 2018 Oct 15] http://newamerica.org/future-land-housing/blog/challenges-rural-land-reform-colombia/.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavo-Campo S, Judd M 2005. The Mindanao Conflict in the Philippines: Social Development Paper, 24, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Semana Rural. 2020, November 4. Así fue la primera muestra productiva de los firmantes del acuerdo de paz. Available at: https://semanarural.com/web/articulo/asi-fue-la-primera-muestra-productiva-de-los-firmantes-del-acuerdo-de-paz/1651
   Google Scholar
• Simmons CS. 2004. The political economy of land conflict in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 94(1):183–206. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401010.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stienen A. 2020. (Re)Claiming territory: Colombia’s ‘Territorial-Peace’ approach and the city. Geogr Helv. 75(3):285–306. doi:10.5194/gh-75-285-2020.
   Google Scholar
• de Administración de Tierras S. 2020. Fondo de Tierras para la Paz alcanzó el 1 millón de hectáreas. Portal para la Paz. Available at: https://www.portalparalapaz.gov.co/publicaciones/1384/fondo-de-tierras-para-la-paz-alcanzo-el-1-millon-de-hectareas/
   Google Scholar
• Subedi DB. 2014. Conflict, combatants, and cash: economic reintegration and livelihoods of Ex-Combatants in Nepal. World Dev. 59:238–250. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers N. 2012. Colombia’s victims’ law: transitional justice in a time of violent conflict? Harvard Human Rights Journa. 25:219–236.
   Google Scholar
• Tellez JF. 2019. Peace agreement design and public support for peace: evidence from Colombia. J Peace Res. 56(6):827–844. doi:10.1177/0022343319853603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorovski D 2016. Post-conflict land administration, facilitator of post-conflict state building [ PhD, University of Twente].
   Google Scholar
• Trajano JC. 2020. Bottom-up peacebuilding: role of grassroots and local actors in the Mindanao peace process. Asian J. Peace Building. 8(2):357–372. doi:10.18588/202011.00a097.
   Google Scholar
• Ugarriza J, Cotrina A, Sequera N. 2013. ¿Qué se negocia en los procesos de paz? Agendas y factores de éxito 1989-2012. Análisis Político. 77:153–174.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council. 2000. Resolution 1325 https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/720/18/PDF/N0072018.pdf?OpenElement
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2008. United nations peacekeeping operations, principles and guidelines. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. ‘Sustaining peace’ strategy must cover entire peace continuum. UN News. Available at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2017/08/564082-sustaining-peace-strategy-must-cover-entire-peace-continuum-un-deputy-chief
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2021. Terminology. United Nations Peacekeeping. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/terminology
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. n.d. The EU-UN partnership on land, natural resources and conflict prevention. https://www.un.org/en/land-natural-resources-conflict/.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1. New York: Seventieth United Nations General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 2018. ¿Qué es un conflicto armado según el Derecho Internacional Humanitario? ACNUR Comité Español. https://eacnur.org/blog/que-es-un-conflicto-armado-segun-el-derecho-internacional-humanitario-tc_alt45664n_o_pstn_o_pst/
   Google Scholar
• Universidad Nacional de Colombia Observatorio de Paz y Conflicto. 2016. Organizaciones Guerrilleras en Colombia desde la década de los sesenta. Observatorio de Paz y Conflicto https://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/observapazyconflicto/files/3614/6980/1326/OPC_Organizaciones_Guerrilleras_Colombia_29_07_16_dv.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uppsala Conflict Data Program. 2022. Uppsala Conflict Data Program, Department of Peace anC conflicR research. Available at: https://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/
   Google Scholar
• van der Molen P, Lemmen C 2004. Land administration in post - conflict areas. In 3rd FIG Regional conference for Asia and the Pacific: Surveying the future – contributions to economic, environmental, and social development. Jakarta (Indonesia). October 3–7, 2004, October 3–7, 2004. 12 p. International Federation of Surveyors (FIG). http://www.itc.nl/library/Papers_2004/n_p_conf/vandermolen_land.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van der Molen P. 2002. The dynamic aspect of land administration:an often-forgotten component in system design. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 26(5):361–381. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00009-1.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen M, Ansoms A, Mudinga EM, Bisoka AM, Niyonkuru R, Shaw J, van der Haar G. 2021. Promoting land tenure security for sustainable peace — lessons on the politics of transformation | elsevier enhanced reader. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 49(49):57–65. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2021.02.012.
   Google Scholar
• Weller M, Retter M, Varga A. 2021. International law and peace settlements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. 2017. Land: territory, domain, and identity. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail
   Google Scholar