Social capital vs. anonymity? 3Ds Urban form and social capital development in Indonesian cities

References

• Arundel R, Ronald R. 2017. The role of urban form in sustainability of community: The case of Amsterdam. Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci. 44(1):33–53. doi:10.1177/0265813515608640.
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner JK, Largey AG. 2008. Social interaction and urban sprawl. J Urban Econ. 64(1):18–34. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2007.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabras I, Mount MP. 2017. How third places foster and shape community cohesion, economic development and social capital: the case of pubs in rural Ireland. J Rural Stud. 55:71–82. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran J, Zahnow R, Wickes R, Hipp J. 2018. Neighbourhood land use features, collective efficacy and local civic actions. Urban Stud. 55(11):2372–2390. doi:10.1177/0042098017717212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey N, Brown C, Bramley G. 2012. The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Prog Plann. 77(3):89–141. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2012.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis PD (2010). Indonesia’s urban development towards inclusive and sustainable economic growth.
   Google Scholar
• Fadillah I (2017, June 14). Indonesia, country with high tolerance. Republika. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/orhxaq413/indonesia-country-with-high-tolerance
   Google Scholar
• Finneran L, Kelly M. 2003. Social networks and inequality. J Urban Econ. 53(2):282–299. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00513-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forshee J. 2006. Culture and customs of Indonesia. Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• French S, Wood L, Foster SA, Giles-Corti B, Frank L, Learnihan V. 2014. Sense of community and its association with the neighborhood built environment. Environ Behav. 46(6):677–697. doi:10.1177/0013916512469098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Henderson JV, Inman RP. 2000. The future of Urban research: non-market interactions. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs. 1(1):101–138. doi:10.1353/urb.2000.0004.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Laibson D, Sacerdote B. 2002 Nov. An economic approach to social capital. Econ J. 112(483):F437–F458. doi:10.2307/798456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha SK. 2010. Housing, social capital and community development in Seoul. Cities. 27(SUPPL. 1):S35–S42. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2010.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hart J, Parkhurst G. 2011. Driven to excess: impacts of motor vehicles on the quality of life of residents of three streets in Bristol. World Transport Policy & Practice. 17(2):12–30. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hemani S, Das AK, Chowdhury A. 2016. Influence of urban forms on social sustainability: a case of Guwahati, Assam. Urban Des Int. 22(2):168–194. doi:10.1057/s41289-016-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hype P (2021). How urbanization has impacted Indonesia. Urban Life in Indonesia. https://www.paulhypepage.co.id/urban-life-in-indonesia/
   Google Scholar
• Ijla M. 2012. Does public space create social capital? Int J Sociol Anthropol. 4(2):48–53. doi:10.5897/IJSA11.084.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs J. 1961. The death and life of American cities.
   Google Scholar
• Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D. 1997. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am J Public Health. 87(9):1491–1498. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.9.1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinenberg E. 2018. Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Koenjtaraningrat. 1985. Javanese Culture. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latham A, Layton J. 2019. Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass. 13(7):e12444. doi:10.1111/gec3.12444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Yoo C, Ha J, Seo J. 2017. Are perceived neighbourhood built environments associated with social capital? Evidence from the 2012 Seoul survey in South Korea. Int J Urban Sci. 21(sup1):1–17. doi:10.1080/12265934.2017.1396909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden KM. 2003. Social capital and the built environment: the importance of Walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health. 93(9):1546–1551. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X (2016). Applied ordinal logistic regression using STATA.
   Google Scholar
• Lund H. 2003. Testing the claims of new urbanism: local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. J Am Plann Assoc. 69(4):414–429. doi:10.1080/01944360308976328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardiah WMRWN. 2015. Compact Urban form for sociability in Urban neighbourhoods. Int J Humanit Soc. 5(10):822–826. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2015.V5.564.
   Google Scholar
• Masuda K, Yudhistira MH. 2020. Does education secularize the Islamic population? The effect of years of schooling on religiosity, voting, and pluralism in Indonesia. World Dev. 130:104915. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maula BS. 2013. Between upholding constitutional provisions and complying with social considerations. J Indones Islam. 7(2):383–403. doi:10.15642/JIIS.2013.7.2.383-403.
   Google Scholar
• Mavridis D. 2015. Ethnic diversity and social capital in Indonesia. World Dev. 67:376–395. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzayanah IFU, Nazara S, Mahi BR, Hartono D. 2020. Is there social capital in cities ? The association of urban form and social capital formation in the metropolitan cities of Indonesia. Int J Urban Sci. 1–25. doi:10.1080/12265934.2020.1730934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabil NA, Elsayed G, Eldayem A. 2015. Influence of mixed land-use on realizing the social capital. HBRC J. 11(2):285–298. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.03.009.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen D. 2010. Evidence of the impacts of urban sprawl on social capital. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 37(4):610–627. doi:10.1068/b35120.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg R. 2001. Celebrating the third place: Inspiring stories about the great good places at the heart of our communities. Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parente F. 2019. Inequality and social capital in the EU regions: a multidimensional analysis. Reg Stud Reg Sci. 6(1):1–24. doi:10.1080/21681376.2018.1558105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park RE. 1917. The city: Suggestions for investigation of human behavior in the city environment. Am J Sociol. 20(5):577–612. doi:10.1086/212433.
   Google Scholar
• Parts E (2013). The dynamics and determinants of social capital in the European Union and neighbouring countries. In SEARCH Working Paper (Issue January). 10.2139/ssrn.2336016
   Google Scholar
• Putnam RD. 2000. Bowling ALone: THe collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam RD. 2007. E pluribus unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scan Polit Stud. 30(2):137–174. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. 2002. Hierarchical linear model. in applications and data analysis method 2nd ed. (vol. 1). Sage Publication Ltd. http://dlx.b-ok.org/genesis/1495000/1759fb5ea8448308e5e7c67597f1c2bf/_as/[Stephen_W._Raudenbush,_Anthony_S._Bryk]_Hierarchi(b-ok.org).pdf%0Ahttp://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1993-98120-012.
   Google Scholar
• Roskruge M, Grimes A, Mccann P, Poot J. 2012. Social capital and regional social infrastructure investment: evidence from New Zealand. Int Reg Sci. 35(1):3–25. doi:10.1177/0160017611400068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupasingha A, Goetz SJ, Freshwater D. 2006. The production of social capital in US counties. J Socio-Economics. 35(1):83–101. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.001.
   Google Scholar
• Rustiadi E, Pribadi DO, Pravitasari AE, Indraprahasta GS. 2015. Jabodetabek megacity: from city development toward Urban complex management system. Urban Development Challenges, Risks and Resilience in Asian Mega Cities. 421–445. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55043-3.
   Google Scholar
• Urry J, Larsen J. 2011. The tourist gaze 3.0. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wickes R, Zahnow R, Corcoran J, Hipp JR. 2019. Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion. Urban Stud. 56(1):226–248. doi:10.1177/0042098018780617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissink B, Hazelzet A. 2012. Social networks in ‘neighbourhood Tokyo.’. Urban Stud. 49(7):1527–1548. doi:10.1177/0042098011415437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood L, Frank LD, Giles-corti B. 2010. Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design. Soc Sci Med. 70(9):1381–1390. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2019). Indonesia: Integrated development to improve lives of growing Urban population. In PRESS RELEASE NO: 2019/196/EAP. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2019/06/11/indonesia-integrated-development-to-improve-lives-of-growing-urban-population
   Google Scholar
• Yuen F, Johnson AJ. 2017. Leisure spaces, community, and third places. Leisure Sciences. 39(3):295–303. doi:10.1080/01490400.2016.1165638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Wang SX, Yu L. 2015. Is social capital eroded by the state-led urbanization in China? A case study on indigenous villagers in the urban fringe of Beijing. China Economic Review. 35:232–246. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2014.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y. 2015. Toward community engagement: can the built environment help? Grassroots participation and communal space in Chinese urban communities. Habitat Int. 46:44–53. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziersch A, Osborne K, Baum F. 2011. Local community group participation: who participates and what aspects of neighbourhood matter? Urban Policy Res. 29(4):381–399. doi:10.1080/08111146.2011.623295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanibuchi T, Kondo K, Nakaya T, Shirai K, Hirai H, Kawachi I 2012. Does walkable mean sociable? Neighborhood determinants of social capital among older adults in Japan. Health & Place. 18(2):229–239. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouratidis, K. (2017). Built environment and social well-being: How does urban form affect social life and personal relationships? Cities. 1. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabras I, Lau CKM 2019. The availability of local services and its impact on community cohesion in rural areas: Evidence from the English countryside. Local Economy. 34(3):248–270. doi:10.1177/0269094219831951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Xiao Y, Ye Y. 2017. Urban density, diversity and design: is more always better for walking? a study from Hong Kong. Prev Med. 103: S99–S103. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2016. Indonesia’s urban story.
   Google Scholar
• Setiawan B 2017. Towards the new urban agenda of safe cities : urban crimes in four Indonesian cities Towards the new urban agenda of safe cities : urban crimes in four Indonesian cities. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1–8. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/99/1/012037.
   Google Scholar
• Heggie, J. 2015. Sustainable Cities: Challenges and Opportunities in Jakarta. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/great-energy-challenge/2015/sustainable-cities-challenges-and-opportunities-in-jakarta/
   Google Scholar
• Seta F, Biswas A, Khare A, Sen J. 2015. Understanding Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Szreter S, Woolcock M. 2004. Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the pol- itical economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol. 33(4):650–667. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrivens K, Smith C 2013. Four interpretations of social capital. OECD Statistics working paper 2013/06. 6. doi:10.1787/5jzbcx010wmt-e.
   Google Scholar
• Oidjarv H 2018. The Tale of Two Communities : Residents ’ Perceptions of the Built Environment and Neighborhood Social Capital. SAGE Open, April-June. 1–20. doi:10.1177/2158244018768386.
   Google Scholar
• Jens FLS. 2016. Rural–urban Differences in Bonding and Bridging Social Capital. Reg Stud. 50(3):391–410. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.918945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams SA, Hipp JR. 2019. How great and how good?: Third places, neighbor interaction, and cohesion in the neighborhood context. Soc Sci Res. 77(October 2018):68–78. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.10.008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putnam RD. 1995. Tuning In, Tuning Out: the Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. PS Polit Sci Polit. 28(4):1–20. http://www.apsanet.org/PS/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamruzzaman M, Wood L, Hine J, Currie G, Giles-Corti B, Turrell G. 2014. Patterns of social capital associated with transit oriented development. Journal ofTransport Geography. 35:144–155. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meer T, Tolsma J. 2014. Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion. Annu Rev Sociol. 40:459–478. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn D. 2000. Income inequality, social cohesion, and the health status of populations. Soc Sci Med. 51:135–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington APA 2015. Building Social Capital Through Urban Design and Planning Activities.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space - translated by Koch J. doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.01.005.
   Google Scholar
• Azzam AO. (2018). Socially Sustainable Neighborhoods: Special Reference to the Egyptian Context ( January).
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira V 2016. Urban Morphology an Introduction to the Study of the Physical Form of Cities. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trova V. 2012. Measures of Street Connectivity : Spatialist _ Lines (MoSC). Accessibility Instruments for Planning Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Wood L, Shannon T, Bulsara M, Pikora T, Mccormack G, Giles-Corti B. 2008. The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: an exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents’ perceptions of safety. Health & Place. 14:15–31. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patacchini E, Picard P, Zenou Y. (2015). Urban social structure, social capital and spatial proximity. Social Capital and Spatial…,1–40. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=2584018
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser EL, Gottlieb JD. 2006. Urban resurgence and the consumer city. Urban Studies. 43(8):1275–1299. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/ehost/ pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=ca744bf0-86ac-403e-ba0f-db11bb964e99%40sessionmgr4010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave S 2011. Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries. Sustainable Development. 19(3):189–205. doi:10.1002/sd.433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijden EVD, Lensberg T (2003). Social capital formation : Some theory and experimental evidence. (May).
   Google Scholar
• Castiglione D,DJWV, Wolleb G 2008. Social Capital’s Fortune: an Introduction. Handbook of Social Capital. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam RD 1993. What markes democrcy work?. Natl Civ Rev. 82:101–107. doi:10.1002/ncr.4100820204
   Google Scholar
• Coleman J. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Soc. 94:S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 1995. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Nayak BP, Werthmann, C. 2013. Harnessing social capital to achieve social development goals: Collective action for fuel transition among urban poor in India. Urban Res. Pract. 6(3):376–381.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. 2006. A Reinvestigation of the Alleged Decline of social.
   Google Scholar
• Myeong S, Seo, H. 2016. Which type of social capital matters for building trust in government? Looking for a new type of social capital in the governance era. Sustainability (Switzerland). 8(4). doi:10.3390/su8040322.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra MS, Dahlvik J 2018. Neighbourhood participation in super-diverse contexts: comparing Amsterdam and Vienna. Urban Res. Pract. 11(4):441–459. doi:10.1080/17535069.2017.1390780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D. L. 2010. Club goods and group identity: Evidence from Islamic resurgence during the Indonesian financial crisis. J Polit Econ. 118(2: 300–354. doi:10.1086/652462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, L. 2016. Religious Pluralism in Indonesia. Asia Pac. J. Anthropol. 17(5): 387–398. doi:10.1080/14442213.2016.1218534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen JR 1986. On the Political Construction of Tradition: Gotong Royong in Indonesia. J Asian Stud. 45(3):545. doi:10.2307/2056530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2018. Urbanization for all (Issue September). www.worldbank.org/id.%0Ahttp://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/498361537371495086/pdf/130014-REVISED-IEQ-Sept-2018-ENG-for-web-revised.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2015. East Asia’s Changing Urban Landscape. In World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Ferrara, E. La. 2000. Participation in Heterogeneous Communities. Q J Econ. 115(3): 847–904. doi:10.1162/003355300554935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Baum, C. F., Ganz, M. L., Subramanian, S. V, & Kawachi, I. 2011. Social Science & Medicine The contextual effects of social capital on health : A cross-national instrumental variable analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 73(12): 1689–1697. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgar FJ, Davis CG, Wohl MJ, Trites SJ, Zelenski JM, Martin, MS. 2011. Social capital, health and life satisfaction in 50 countries. Health Place. 17(5):1044–1053. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.06.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward CD, Shackleton, CM. 2016. Natural Resource Use, Incomes, and Poverty Along the Rural-Urban Continuum of Two Medium-Sized, South African Towns. World Dev. 78:80–93. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, E. 2002. Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 29(2): 219–250. doi:10.1068/b2713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel A, Bendit E, Kaplan, S. 2013. Residential location choice of knowledge-workers: the role of amenities, workplace and lifestyle. Cities. 35:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Toit L, Cerin E, Leslie E, Owen, N. 2007. Does walking in the neighbourhood enhance local sociability?. Urban Studies. 44(9):1677–1695. doi:10.1080/00420980701426665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, S., Lee, E., Klik, K. A., Markus, A., Hewstone, M., & Reynolds, K. J. 2018. Are diverse societies less cohesive? Testing contact and mediated contact theories. PLoS ONE. 13(3):1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulay A, Ujang N, Said I 2017. Legibility of neighborhood parks as a predicator for enhanced social interaction towards social sustainability. Cities. 61:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw J, Meijer E 2008. Handbook of multilevel analysis. Handbook of Multilevel Analysis. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73186-5
   Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ 1999. Multilevel Analysis: an Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage Publication Ltd. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-009959
   Google Scholar
• Möhring K 2012. The fixed effects approach as an alternative to multilevel analysis for cross-national analyses. Crafting Cross-National Social Policy Analysis. 1–19.
   Google Scholar