Challenges to implementing circular development – lessons from London

References

• Adams KT, Osmani M, Thorpe T, Thornback J. 2017. Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proc Inst Civil Eng: Waste and Resour Manage. 170(1):15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander C, Smaje C. 2008. Evaluating third sector reuse organisations in the UK: case-studies and analysis of furniture reuse schemes. Resour Conserv Recycl. 52(5):719–730. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allwinkle S, Cruickshank P. 2011. Creating smarter cities: an overview. Journal of Urban Technology. 18(2):1–16. DOI:10.1080/10630732.2011.601103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson EC, Minor ES. 2017. Vacant lots: an underexplored resource for ecological and social benefits in cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 21:146–152. DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson MF, Lepczyk CA, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS, Nilon CH, Vargo T. 2017. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front Ecol Environ. 15(4):189–196. DOI:10.1002/fee.1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins Global. 2012. Enabling the olympic park, Atkins website. [accessed 2020 Apr 24]; https://www.atkinsglobal.com/en-gb/media-centre/features/enabling-olympic-park
   Google Scholar
• Axinte LF, Mehmood A, Marsden T, Roep D. 2019. Regenerative city-regions: a new conceptual framework. Reg Stud Reg Sci. 6(1):117–129. DOI:10.1080/21681376.2019.1584542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barragán-Escandón A, Terrados-Cepeda JA, Zalamea-León E. 2017. The role of renewable energy in the promotion of circular urban metabolism. Sustainability. 9(12):2341. DOI:10.3390/su9122341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastein AGTM, Roelofs E, Rietveld E, Hoogendoorn A. 2013. Opportunities for a circular economy in the Netherlands. Delft: TNO; p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bolger K, Doyon A. 2019. Circular cities: exploring local government strategies to facilitate a circular economy. Eur plann stud. 27(11):2184–2205. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2019.1642854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgström S, Zachrisson A, Eckerberg K. 2016. Funding ecological restoration policy in practice—patterns of short-termism and regional biases. Land Use Policy. 52:439–453. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand P. 2007. Green subjection: the politics of neoliberal urban environmental management. Int J Urban Reg Res. 31(3):616–632. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00748.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner N, Theodore N. 2002. Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode. 34(3):349–379. DOI:10.1111/1467-8330.00246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne D, O’Regan B, Moles R. 2009. Assessment of total urban metabolism and metabolic inefficiency in an Irish city-region. Waste Manage. 29(10):2765–2771. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni C, Akyol Ç, Cipolletta G, Eusebi AL, Caniani D, Masi S, Colon J, Fatone F. 2020. Decentralized community composting: past, present and future aspects of Italy. Sustainability. 12(8):3319. DOI:10.3390/su12083319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullen P, Love P. 2010. The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: views from the field. Cities. 27(4):215–224. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2009.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byström J. 2018. The fifteen circular steps for cities. European Investment Bank Report.
   Google Scholar
• Cabanek A, and Newman P. 2017. Biophilic urban regeneration: can biophilics be a land value capture mechanism? In: Brebbia CA, Zubir SS, Hassan AS, editors. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. Sustainable Development and Planning, (p. 65-78). Southampton: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cambier C, Galle W, De Temmerman N. 2020. Research and development directions for design support tools for circular building. Buildings. 10(8):142. DOI:10.3390/buildings10080142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly JJ, Svendsen ES, Fisher DR, Campbell LK. 2013. Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landsc Urban Plan. 109(1):76–84. DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, Daly HE. 1987. Toward an ecological economics. Ecol Modell. 38(1–2):1–7. DOI:10.1016/0304-3800(87)90041-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly HE. 2007. Ecological economics and sustainable development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Daothong J, Stubbs D. 2014. London 2012 legacy: creating a more sustainable future for London and beyond. Proc Inst Civil Eng Civil Eng Special Issue. 167(CE6):3–12. DOI:10.1680/cien.14.00006.
   Google Scholar
• Demuzere M, Orru K, Heidrich O, Olazabal E, Geneletti D, Orru H, Bhave AG, Mittal N, Feliu E, Faehnle M. 2014. Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. J Environ Manage. 146:107–115. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley R. 2017. Circular design futures. Des J. 20(4):421–434. DOI:10.1080/14606925.2017.1328164.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein D, Jackson R, Braithwaite P. 2011. Delivering London 2012: sustainability strategy. Proc ICE Civil Eng. 164:27–33. DOI:10.1680/cien.2011.164.5.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D. 2010. Towards governing infrasystem transitions: reinforcing lock-in or facilitating change? Technol Forecast Soc Change. 77(8):1292–1301. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki N, Borgström S, Gorissen L, Egermann M, Ehnert F. 2017. Nature-based solutions accelerating urban sustainability transitions in cities: lessons from dresden, genk and stockholm cities. In: Kabisch N, Korn H, Stadler J, Bonn A, editors. Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas: linkages between science, policy and practice. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; p. 65–88.
   Google Scholar
• Greater London Authority. 2015. Round demographic projections; and best foot forward: city limits – a resource flow and ecological footprint analysis of Greater. London:published by City Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greater London Authority. 2018. The London food strategy: implementation plan 2018–2023. published by City Hall: London.
   Google Scholar
• Greater London Authority. 2021. The London plan 2021-, published by city hall: london.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Barton DN, Langemeyer J, McPhearson T, O’farrell P, Andersson E, Hamstead Z, Kremer P. 2013. Urban ecosystem services. In: Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 175–251.
   Google Scholar
• Guerry AD, Polasky S, Lubchenco J, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Griffin R, Ruckelshaus M, Bateman IJ, Duraiappah A, Elmqvist T, et al. 2015. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 112(24):7348–7355. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1503751112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold R, Hertzog C. 2015. Data privacy for the smart grid. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. DOI:10.1201/b18005.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hou A-T, Al-Tabbaa, Hellings A, Hellings J. 2015. Sustainable site clean-up from megaprojects: lessons from London 2012. Proc Inst Civil Eng, Eng Sustainability. 168(2):61–70. DOI:10.1680/ensu.14.00025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer P, Hamstead ZA, McPhearson T. 2016. The value of urban ecosystem services in New York City: a spatially explicit multicriteria analysis of landscape scale valuation scenarios. Environ Sci Policy. 62:57–68. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacovidou E, Purnell P. 2016. Mining the physical infrastructure: opportunities, barriers and interventions in promoting structural components reuse. Sci Total Environ. 557:791–807. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart J, van Vliet B, Mol A. 2015. New roles for local authorities in a time of climate change: the Rotterdam energy approach and planning as a case of urban symbiosis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 107:593–601. 1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.026. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London Legacy Development Corporation. 2017. Your park, our planet: environmental sustainability report 2016-17. published by London Legacy Development Corporation: London
   Google Scholar
• London Waste & Recycling Board. 2015. London the circular economy capital: towards a circular economy–Context and opportunities. Report published by LWARB.
   Google Scholar
• London Waste and Recycling Board. 2017. London’s circular economy route map. Report published by LWARB.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato M. 2011. The entrepreneurial state. Soundings. 49(49):131–142. DOI:10.3898/136266211798411183.
   Google Scholar
• McPhearson T, Pickett ST, Grimm NB, Niemelä J, Alberti M, Elmqvist T, Weber C, Haase D, Breuste J, Qureshi S. 2016. Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience. 66(3):198–212. DOI:10.1093/biosci/biw002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham TG, Barnett GB. 2008. Environmental volunteering: motivations, modes and outcomes. Aust. Geogr. 39(4):537–552. DOI:10.1080/00049180802419237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell I. 2018. Financing the future of green infrastructure planning: alternatives and opportunities in the UK. Landscape Res. 43(6):751–768. DOI:10.1080/01426397.2017.1390079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno M, De Los Rios C, Rowe Z, Charnley F. 2016. A conceptual framework for circular design. Sustainability. 8(9):937. DOI:10.3390/su8090937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL. 2008. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol. 41(1–2):127–150. DOI:10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberndorfer E, Lundholm J, Bass B, Coffman RR, Doshi H, Dunnett N, Gaffin S, Köhler M, Liu KK, Rowe B. 2007. Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions, and services. BioScience. 57(10):823–833. DOI:10.1641/B571005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODA (Olympic Delivery Authority). 2007. Sustainable development strategy. London (UK):ODA.
   Google Scholar
• Paiho S, Mäki E, Wessberg N, Paavola M, Tuominen P, Antikainen M, Heikkilä J, Rozado CA, Jung N. 2020. Towards circular cities—Conceptualizing core aspects. Sustainable Cities Soc. 59:102143. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson LJ, Pearson L, Pearson CJ. 2010. Sustainable urban agriculture: stocktake and opportunities. Int J Agric Sustain. 8(1–2):7–19. DOI:10.3763/ijas.2009.0468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit-Boix A, Leipold S. 2018. Circular economy in cities: reviewing how environmental research aligns with local practices. J Clean Prod. 195:1270–1281. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincetl S, Bunje P, Holmes T. 2012. An expanded urban metabolism method: toward a systems approach for assessing urban energy processes and causes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 107(3):193–202. DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard C, Booth S, Begley A, Kerr D, Mackintosh B, Janice J, Campbell C, Whelan J, Milligan R, Bergström J, et al. 2016. Working in partnership with the charitable food sector to better meet the food needs of people in Perth. Parity. 29(2):39–40. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/15261
   Google Scholar
• Prendeville S, Cherim E, Bocken N. 2018. Circular cities: mapping six cities in transition. Environ Innovation Societal Transitions. 26:171–194. DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelich K, Knoeri C, Steinberger J, Varga L, Blythee P, Butler D, Gupta R, Harrison G, Martini C, Purnell P. 2015. Towards resource-efficient and service-oriented integrated infrastructure operation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 92:40–52. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrokni H, Lazarevic D, Brandt N. 2014. Smart urban metabolism: toward a real-time understanding of the energy and material flows of city and its citizens. Urban Technol. 22(1):65–86. DOI:10.1080/10630732.2014.954899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shandas V, Messer WB. 2008. Fostering green communities through civic engagement: community-based environmental stewardship in the Portland area. J Am Plann Assoc. 74(4):408–418. DOI:10.1080/01944360802291265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swickard TJ. 2008. Regulatory incentives to promote private sector brownfield remediation and reuse. Soil Sediment Contam. 17(2):121–136. DOI:10.1080/1532038070187039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheriattar R. 2020. Valuing sustainability of adaptable infrastructure using ROA-SEC: a hybrid approach. Int J Built Environ and Sustainability. 7(1):67–79. DOI:10.11113/ijbes.v7.n1.433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend AM. 2013. Smart cities: big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a New Utopia. New York (NY, USA): WW Norton & Company. DOI:10.1365/s40702-015-0156-y.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh GC. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy. 28:817–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buren N, Demmers M, Van der Heijden R, Witlox F. 2016. Towards a circular economy: the role of Dutch logistics industries and governments. Sustainability. 8(7):647. DOI:10.3390/su8070647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stijn A, and Gruis V. 2019. Towards a circular built environment: an integral design tool for circular building components. Smart and Sustainable Built Environ. 9(4):635–653. DOI:10.1108/SASBE-05-2019-0063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velis C. 2015. Circular economy and global secondary material supply chains. Waste Manage Res. 33:389–391. DOI:10.1177/0734242X15587641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox J, Nasirib F, Bell S, Rahaman S. 2016. Urban water reuse: a triple bottom line assessment framework and review. Sustainable Cities and Society. 27:448–456. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2016. Can low carbon city experiments transform the development regime? Futures. 77:80–96. DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2019a. Circular cities. Urban Stud. 56(13):2746–2762. DOI:10.1177/0042098018806133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2019b. Circular cities: challenges to implementing looping actions. Sustainability. 11(2):423. DOI:10.3390/su11020423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2020. The role of spatial planning in transitioning to circular urban development. Urban Geogr. 41(6):915–919. DOI:10.1080/02723638.2020.1796042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2021a. Circular cities: a revolution in urban sustainability. London: Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9780429490613.
   Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2021b. Circular cities: the benefits of circular development. Sustainability. 13(10):5725. DOI:10.3390/su13105725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2022. Circular cities: planning for circular development in European cities. Eur Plann Stud. 1–22. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2022.2060707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. 2013. Urban metabolism: a review of research methodologies. Environmental Pollution. 178:463–473. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Water T. 2019. Revised Draft Water Management Resources Management Plan 2019. London.
   Google Scholar