False Discovery Versus Familywise Error Rate Approaches to Outlier Detection

References

• Badrinath, S. G., and Chatterjee, S. (1988), “On Measuring Skewness and Elongation in Common Stock Return Distributions: The Case of the Market Index,” Journal of Business, 61, 451–472.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1991), “A Data-Analytic Look at Skewness and Elongation in Common-Stock-Return Distributions. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 9, 223–233.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., and Iglewicz, B. (2007), “A Simple Univariate Outlier Identification Procedure Designed for Large Samples,” Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 36, 249–263.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, V., and Lewis, T. (1994), Outliers in Statistical Data (3rd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995), “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, K., and Perry, J. (2007), A Tale of Tails: An Empirical Analysis of Loss Distribution Models for Estimating Operational Risk Capital, Working Paper 06–13, Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Available at http://www.bos.frb.org /economic /wp /index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, K. K., and Babbel, D. F. (2002), On Measuring Skewness and Kurtosis in Short Rate Distributions: The Case of the US Dollar London Inter-Bank Offer Rates, Working Paper 02–25, Philadelphia, PA: Wharton School Financial Institutions Center.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2005), “Extracting Probabilistic Information from the Prices of Interest Rate Options: Tests of Distributional Assumptions,” Journal of Business, 78, 841–870.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (2005), “Local False Discovery Rates.” Available at http: //statweb.stanford.edu /∼ckirby /brad /papers /2005LocalFDR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2006), “Microarrays, Empirical Bayes, and the Two-Groups Model.” Available at http://statweb.stanford.edu /∼ckirby /brad /papers /2006TwoGroupsModel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2013), Large-Scale Inference: Empirical Bayes Methods for Estimation, Testing, and Prediction (Institute of Mathematical Statistics Monographs), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, C. A. (2004), “Using the gh Distribution to Model Extreme Wind Speeds,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 122, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• He, Y. L., and Raghunathan, T. (2006), “Tukey's gh Distribution for Multiple Imputation,” The American Statistician, 60, 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Hoaglin, D. C. (1985), “Summarizing Shape Numerically: The g-and-h Distributions,” in: Exploring Data Tables, Trends, and Shapes: Robust and Exploratory Technique, eds. D. C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, and J. W. Tukey, New York: Wiley, pp. 461–513.
   Google Scholar
• Hoaglin, D. C., and Iglewicz, B. (1987), “Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 1147–1149.
   Google Scholar
• Hoaglin, D. C., Iglewicz, B., and Tukey, J. W. (1986), “Performance of Some Resistance Rules for Outlier Labeling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 991–999.
   Google Scholar
• Iglewicz, B., and Hoaglin, D. (1993), How To Detect and Handle Outliers, Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. A., and Arunachalam, V. (2011), “Using Tukey's g and h Family of Distributions to Calculate Value-At-Risk and Conditional Value-At-Risk,” Journal of Risk, 13, 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kafadar, K., and Phang, T. (2003), “Transformations, Background Estimation, and Process Effects in the Statistical Analysis of Microarrays,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 44, 313–338.
   Google Scholar
• Kimber, A. C. (1990), “Exploratory Data Analysis for Possibly Censored Data from Skewed Distributions,” Applied Statistics, 39, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, J., and Iglewicz, B. (1984), “Some Properties of the Tukey g and h Family of Distribution,” Communications in Statistics—Theory and Method, 13, 353–369.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, G. D., and MacGillivray, H. L. (2002), “Numerical Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the g-and-k and Generalized g-and-h Distributions,” Statistics and Computing, 12, 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, G. K. (2005), “Limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data,” in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor, eds. R. Gentleman, V. Carey, S. Dudoit, R. Irizarry, and W. Huber, New York: Springer, pp. 397–420.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, A. G., and Iglewicz, B. (2013), “A Nonparametric Test for Deviation from Randomness with Applications to Stock Market Index Data,” Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 42, 686–697.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1977a), Exploratory Data Analysis, Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1977b), “Modern Techniques in Data Analysis,” in Proceedings of the NSF-Sponsored Regional Research Conference at Southeastern Massachusetts University, North Dartmouth, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., and Ruscio, J. (2009), “To Sum Or Not to Sum: Taxometric Analysis With Ordered Categorical Assessment Items,” Psychological Assessment, 21, 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Iglewicz, B., and Chervoneva, I. (2014), “Robust Estimation of the Parameters of g-and-h Distributions, With Applications to Outlier Detection,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 75, 66–80.
   Google Scholar