Covariate Adjustment for Logistic Regression Analysis of Binary Clinical Trial Data

References

• ADA (2013), “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2013,” Diabetes Care 36, s11–s66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agresti, A., and Hartzel, J. (2000), “Tutorial in Biostatistics: Strategies Comparing Treatment on Binary Response With Multi-Centre Data,” Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1115–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, M. D., and Lagakos, S. (1993), “Loss in Efficiency Caused by Omitting Covariates and Misspecifying Exposure in Logistic Regression Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 166–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blizzard, L., and Hosmer, D. W. (2006), “Parameter Estimation and Goodness-of-Fit in Log Binomial Regression,” Biometrical Journal, 48, 5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canner, P. L. (1991), “Covariate Adjustement of Treatment Effects in Clinical Trials,” Controlled Clinical Trials, 12, 359–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciolino, J. D., Martin, R. H., Zhao, W., Jauch, E. C., Hill, M. D., and Palesch, Y. Y. (2013), “Covariate Imbalance and Adjustment for Logistic Regression Analysis of Clinical Trial Data,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 23, 1383–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deddens, J. A., and Peterson, M. R. (2008), “Approaches for Estimating Prevalence Ratios,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65, 501–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartzd, L. H., Sargente, D., Fordf, R., Danceyg, J., Arbuckh, S., Gwytheri, S., Mooneyg, M., Rubinsteing, L., Shankarg, L., Doddg, L., Kaplanj, R., Lacombec, D., and Verweijk, J. (2009), “New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours: Revised RECIST Guideline (Version 1.1),” European Journal of Caner, 45, 228–247.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, I., and Norrie, J. (2002), “The Role of Covariates in Estimating Treatment and Risk in Long Term Clinical Trials,” Statistics in Medicine, 21, 2899–2908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gail, M. H., Wieand, S., and Piantadosi, S. (1984), “Biased Estimates of Treatment Effect in Randomized Experiments With Nonlinear Regressions and Omitted Covariates,” Biometrika, 71, 431–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck, W. W., Anderson, S., and Marcus, S. M. (1998), “Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials?” Controlled Clinical Trials, 19, 249–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hauck, W. W., Neuhaus, J. M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., and Anderson, S. (1991), “A Consequence of Omitted Covariates When Estimating Odds Ratios,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 77–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, A. V., Steyerberg, E. W., and Habbema, J. D. (2004), “Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Controlled Trials With Dichotomous Outcomes Increases Statistical Power and Reduces Sample Size Requirements,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 454–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, R. R., Thorne, K. I., Farmer, A. J., Davies, M. J., Keenan, J. F., Paul, S., and Levy, J. C. for the 4-T Study Group. (2007), “Addition of Biphasic, Prandial, or Basal Insulin to Oral Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes,” New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 1716–1730.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, H. H., Kulkarni, P. M., Mallinckrodt, C. H., Shurzinske, L., Molenberghs, G., and Lipkovich, I. (2015a), “To Adjust or Not to Adjust for Baseline When Analyzing Repeated Binary Responses? The Case of Complete Data When Treatment Comparison at Study End is of Interest,” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 14, 262–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2015b), “Adjusting for Baseline on the Analysis of Repeated Binary Responses With Missing Data,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 7, 238–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernan, W. N., Viscoli, C. M., Makuch, R. W., Brass, L. M., and Horwitz, R. I.(1999), “Stratified Randomization for Clinical Trials,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52, 19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. A. (1999), “Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials (ICH E9): An Introductory Note on an International Guideline,” Statistics in Medicine, 18, 1903–1904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkovich, I., Duan, Y., and Ahmed, S. (2005), “Multiple Imputation Compared With Restricted Pseudo-Likelihood and Generalized Estimating Equations for Analysis of Binary Repeated Measures in Clinical Studies,” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4, 267–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, K., Yeatts, S. D., Zhao, W., Ciolino, J., Borg, K., and Durkalski, V. (2015), “The Impact of Covariate Adjustment at Randomization and Analysis for Binary Outcomes: Understanding Differences Between Superiority and Noninferiority Trials,” Statistics in Medicine, 34, 1834–1840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, S. J., Assmann, S. E., Enos, L. E., and Kasten, L. E. (2002), “Subgroup Analysis, Covariate Adjustment and Baseline Comparisons in Clinical Trial Reporting: Current Practice and Problems,” Statistics in Medicine, 21, 2917–2930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, G. M., Day, S., and Sales, J. (2000), “How to Select Covariates to Include in the Analysis of a Clinical Trial,” Controlled Clinical Trials, 21, 330–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson, L. D., and Jewell, N. P. (1991), “Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression Models,” International Statistical Review, 58, 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. (2008), SAS/STAT® 9.2 User's Guide, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Steyerberg, E. W., Bossuyt, P. M., and Lee, K. L. (2000), “Clinical Trials in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Should We Adjust for Baseline Characteristics?” American Heart Journal, 139, 745–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Weele, T., and Arah, O. A. (2011), “Unmeasured Confounding for General Outcomes, Treatments, and Confounders,” Epidemiology, 22, 42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and Louis, T. A. (2003), “Matching Conditional and Marginal Shapes in Binary Random Intercept Models Using a Bridge Distribution Function,” Biometrika, 90, 765–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and Louis, T. A. (2004), “Marginalizing Binary Mixed-Effect Models With Covariate-Dependent Random Effects and Likelihood Inference,” Biometrics, 60, 884–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E., and Meyer, D. A. (1978), “A Rating Scale For Mania: Reliability, Validity And Sensitivity,” British Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar