https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-613X
References
- Daffner, K. R. (2000), “Current Approaches to the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease,” in Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease, eds. L. F. M. Scinto and K. R. Daffner, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 29–64.
- Dong, T., Attwood, Hutson, T., A., Liu, S., and Tian, L. (2017), “A New Diagnostic Accuracy Measure and Cut-Point Selection Criterion,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 26, 2832–2852. DOI: 10.1177/0962280215611631.
- Mitchell, A. J., and Shiri-Feshki, M. (2009), “Rate of Progression of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia: Meta-Analysis of 41 Robust Inception Cohort Studies,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 119, 252–265. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01326.x.
- Mueller, S. G., Weiner, M.W., Thal, L. J., Petersen, R. C., Jack, C. C., Jagust, W., Trojanowski, J. Q., Toga, A. W., and Beckett, L. (2005), “The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative,” Neuroimaging Clinics, 15, 869–877. DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2005.09.008.
- Morris, J. C., Storandt, M., Miller, J. P., McKeel, D. W., Price, J. L., Rubin, E. H., and Berg, L. (2001), “Mild Cognitive Impairment Represents Early-Stage Alzheimer Disease,” Archives of Neurology, 58, 397–405. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.58.3.397.
- Roberts, R., and Knopman, D. S. (2013), “Classification and Epidemiology of MCI,” Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 29, 753–772. DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.003.
- Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., and Matchar, D. B. (1991), “Likelihood Ratios With Confidence: Sample Size Estimation for Diagnostic Test Studies,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 763–770. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-V.
- Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., and Matchar, D. B. (1993), “Likelihood Ratios for Continuous Test Results—Making the Clinicians’ Job Easier or Harder?,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 85–93.
- Yin, J., Nakas, C. T., Tian, L., and Reiser, B. (2018), “Confidence Intervals for Differences Between Volumes Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Surfaces (VUS) and Generalized Youden Indices (GYIs),” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 27, 675–688. DOI: 10.1177/0962280217740787.