46
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Artistic labour in dance and painting: revisiting the theory-practice debate via mimesis (Anukrti) and the abject body

Bibliography

  • Primary Sources
  • Nāṭyaśāstra of Sri Bharata Muni, Part III, chapters 12-18, with a commentary, Abhinavagupta by Abhinavaguptacarya & Manorama (Hindi Commentary) by Parasanatha Dvivedi, Varanasi: Sampurnanand Sanskrit Vidyalaya, 2001.
  • Vişņudharmottarapurāņa. Parul Dave Mukherji, ed. Citrasūtra of the Vişņudharmottara Purāņa. Kanda III. Chapters 35–43. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2001.
  • Naṭānkuśa: A Critique on Dramaturgy, K. G. Paulrose, ed. and trans., New Delhi, Sangeet Natak Akademi, 1994.
  • Secondary Sources
  • Bose, M. Movement and Mimesis: The Idea of Dance in the Sanskritic Tradition. Netherlands: Springer, 1991.
  • Dave-Mukherji, P. ”Who is Afraid of Mimesis? Contesting the Common Sense of Indian in Aesthetics Through the Theory of ‘Mimesis’ in Anukaraņa Vāda.” In The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, edited by A. Chakrabarti, 71–92. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.
  • Dave-Mukherji, P. ”Rethinking Gender Issues in Indian Art.” In Towards a New Art History: Studies in Indian Art, edited by S. K. Panikkar, P. Dave-Mukherji, and D. Achar, 122–130. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld, 2003.
  • Dehejia, V. The Body Adorned: Dissolving Boundaries Between the Sacred and the Profane in India’s Art. Ahmedabad: Mapin, 2009.
  • Maxwell, T. S. ”Śilpa versus Śāstra.” In Shastric Traditions in Indian ArtsVol. 1. edited by A. L. Dallapiccolla, 5–15. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GMBH, 1989.
  • Misra, R. N. Ancient Artists & Art-Activity. Shimla: I.I.A.S., 1975.
  • Misra, R. N. “Śilpa’s ‘Rights’ of Passage in Tradition.” Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, IIAS Journal of Inter-University Centre, IIAS Journal of Inter-University Centre XII, no. 1. (2005): 131–151.
  • Pollock, S. ”The Sanskrit Cosmopolis, A.D. 300–1300: Transculturation, Vernacularization, and the Question of Ideology.” In The Ideology and Status of Sanskrit in South and Southeast Asia, edited by J. E. M. Houben, 197–247. Leiden: Brill, 1996.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.