A systematic design of multifunctional lattice structures with energy absorption and phononic bandgap by topology and parameter optimization

References

• Wang C, Zhu J, Wu M, et al. Multi-scale design and optimization for solid-lattice hybrid structures and their application to aerospace vehicle components. Chin J Aeronaut. 2021;34(5):386–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sufiiarov VS, Orlov AV, Borisov EV, et al. Design and mechanical properties simulation of graded lattice structures for additive manufacturing endoprostheses, Mech Adv Mater Struc. 2021;28(16):1656–1662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng J, Liu B, Lin Z, et al. Isotropic octet-truss lattice structure design and anisotropy control strategies for implant application. Mater Design. 2021;203:109595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jam A, du Plessis A, Lora C, et al. Manufacturability of lattice structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion: a novel biomedical application of the beta Ti-21S alloy. Addit Manuf. 2022;50:102556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X, Jiang Y, Zhao T, et al. Compression experiment and numerical evaluation on mechanical responses of the lattice structures with stochastic geometric defects originated from additive-manufacturing. Compos B Eng. 2020;194:108030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Yang F, Li P, et al. Design and additive manufacturing of a modified face-centered cubic lattice with enhanced energy absorption capability. Exter Mech Lett. 2021;47:101358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C, Wu W, Zhang H, et al. Mechanical characteristics of superimposed 316l lattice structures under static and dynamic loading. Adv Eng Mater. 2021;23(7):2001536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun ZP, Guo YB, Shim VPW. Characterisation and modeling of additively-manufactured polymeric hybrid lattice structures for energy absorption. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;191:106101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin H, Yang D. Vibration reduction design method of metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Mater Sci. 2019;54(22):14038–14054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Ni Y, He LH. Rutile-mimic 3D metamaterials with simultaneously negative Poisson’s ratio and negative compressibility. Mater Design. 2021;200:109440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez Corbaton I, Rockstuhl C, Ziemke P, et al. New twists of 3d chiral metamaterials. Adv Mater. 2019;31(26):1807742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel T, Kadic M, Wegener M. Three-dimensional mechanical metamaterials with a twist. Science. 2017;358(6366):1072–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Ma L. 1D to 3D multi-stable architected materials with zero Poisson’s ratio and controllable thermal expansion. Mater Design. 2020;188:108430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Wu W, Zhang J, et al. Drastic tailorable thermal expansion chiral planar and cylindrical shell structures explored with finite element simulation. Compos Struct. 2019;210:327–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wan Y, Shen Y, et al. Experimental demonstration of lightweight lattice metamaterials with controllable low thermal expansion. Thin Wall Struct. 2021;159:107112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Collini L, Daurel A, et al. Design and additive manufacturing of closed cells from supportless lattice structure. Addit Manuf. 2020;33:101168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir A, Ali M, Jeng J. Investigation of compression and buckling properties of a novel surface-based lattice structure manufactured using multi jet fusion technology. Materials. 2021;14(10):2599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zhang L, Song B, et al. Bamboo-inspired, simulation-guided design and 3D printing of light-weight and high-strength mechanical metamaterials. Appl Mater Today. 2022;26:101268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Hu M, Xiao L, et al. Compressive properties and collapse behavior of additively-manufactured layered-hybrid lattice structures under static and dynamic loadings. Thin Wall Struct. 2020;157:107153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami Babamiri B, Askari H, Hazeli K. Deformation mechanisms and post-yielding behavior of additively manufactured lattice structures. Mater Design. 2020;188:108443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Yang H, Ma L. Design and characterization of 3D AuxHex lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;181:105700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleisch M, Thalhamer A, Meier G, et al. Functional mechanical metamaterial with independently tunable stiffness in the three spatial directions. Mater Today Aav. 2021;11:100155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong H, Zhao S, Wei P, et al. Systematic design and realization of double-negative acoustic metamaterials by topology optimization. Acta Mater. 2019;172:102–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Wang Y, Lu X, et al. Evolutionary topology optimization for mechanical metamaterials with auxetic property. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;179:105638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Hinnebusch S, To AC. Topology optimization design of stretchable metamaterials with Bézier skeleton explicit density (BSED) representation algorithm. Comput Method Appl M. 2020;366:113093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Luo Z, Zhang L, et al. Topological design of pentamode lattice metamaterials using a ground structure method. Mater Design. 2021;202:109523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia J, Da D, Hu J, et al. Crashworthiness design of periodic cellular structures using topology optimization. Compos Struct. 2021;271:114164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech. 1999;69(9–10):635–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Sun S. Scale‐related topology optimization of cellular materials and structures. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2006;68(9):993–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Yuan S, Zhu J, et al. Additive manufacturing-driven design optimization-Building direction and structural topology. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi Y, Yamada T. Topology optimization of acoustic metasurfaces by using a two-scale homogenization method. Appl Math Model. 2021;98:465–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L, Xia Q, Huang X, et al. Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures and materials: a comprehensive review. Arch Comput Method E. 2018;25(2):437–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montemurro M, Bertolino G, Roiné T. A general multi-scale topology optimisation method for lightweight lattice structures obtained through additive manufacturing technology. Compos Struct. 2021;258:113360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Rozvany GIN. The COC algorithm, Part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Method Appl M. 1991;89(1):309–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takezawa A, Nishiwaki S, Kitamura M. Shape and topology optimization based on the phase field method and sensitivity analysis. J Comput Phys. 2010;229(7):2697–2718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Li Z, Ni B, et al. Non-probabilistic reliability-based topology optimization (NRBTO) scheme for continuum structures based on the parameterized level-set method and interval mathematics. Comput Method Appl M. 2021;373:113477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MY, Wang X, Guo D. A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Method Appl M. 2003;192(1–2):227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Zong H, Tian Y, et al. A novel subdomain level set method for structural topology optimization and its application in graded cellular structure design. Struct Multidiscip O. 2019;60(6):2221–2247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Zhang W, Zhong W. Doing topology optimization explicitly and geometrically — a new moving morphable components based framework. J Appl Mech. 2014;81(8). DOI:10.1115/1.4027609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye H, Dai Z, Wang W, et al. ICM method for topology optimization of multimaterial continuum structure with displacement constraint. Acta Mech Sinica-Prc. 2019;35(3):552–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye H, Yuan B, Li J, et al. Geometrically nonlinear topology optimization of continuum structures based on an independent continuous mapping method. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2021;34(5):658–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen E, Andreasen CS. How to determine composite material properties using numerical homogenization. Comp Mater Sci. 2014;83:488–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha W, Xiao M, Zhang J, et al. Robustly printable freeform thermal metamaterials. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):7228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Ye H, Sui Y. Lightweight topology optimization with buckling and frequency constraints using the independent continuous mapping method. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2019;32(3):310–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Ji B, Zhang DZ, et al. Design and mechanical performances of a novel functionally graded sheet-based lattice structure. Addit Manuf. 2022;52:102676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Yang F, Ru D, et al. Additive-manufactured hierarchical multi-circular lattice structures for energy absorption application. Mater Design. 2021;210:110116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshad AB, Nazir A, Jeng J. The effect of fillets and crossbars on mechanical properties of lattice structures fabricated using additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;111(3–4):931–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin N, Wang F, Wang Y, et al. Failure and energy absorption characteristics of four lattice structures under dynamic loading. Mater Design. 2019;169:107655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Xin R, Xu Z, et al. Shock-resistant and energy-absorbing properties of bionic niti lattice structure manufactured by SLM. J Bionic Eng. 2022;19(6):1684–1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashok D, Raju Bahubalendruni MVA, Johnney Mertens A, et al. A novel nature inspired 3D open lattice structure for specific energy absorption. P I Mech Eng E-J Pro. 2022;236(6):2434–2440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niknam H, Akbarzadeh AH. Graded lattice structures: simultaneous enhancement in stiffness and energy absorption. Mater Design. 2020;196:109129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plocher J, Panesar A. Effect of density and unit cell size grading on the stiffness and energy absorption of short fibre-reinforced functionally graded lattice structures. Addit Manuf. 2020;33:101171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Song B, Yang L, et al. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of TiB/Ti6Al4V gradient-material lattice structure fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Compos B Eng. 2020;202:108417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Banerjee A, Hoe A, et al. Design for laser powder bed additive manufacturing of AlSi12 periodic mesoscale lattice structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;113(11–12):3599–3612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverani E, Fortunato A. Stiffness prediction and deformation analysis of Cobalt-Chromium lattice structures: from periodic to functionally graded structures produced by additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process. 2021;68:104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X, Xiao D, Li Y, et al. Dynamic compressive behavior of a modified additively manufactured rhombic dodecahedron 316L stainless steel lattice structure. Thin Wall Struct. 2020;148:106586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Park K. Compressive behavior of soft lattice structures and their application to functional compliance control. Addit Manuf. 2020;33:101148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen J, Zeng Y, Wu C, et al. Silk lattice structures from unidirectional silk fiber–reinforced composites for breaking energy absorption. Adv Eng Mater. 2020;22(3):1900921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wu B, Li J, et al. Low-frequency tunable topological interface states in soft phononic crystal cylinders. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;191:106098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang Y, Yao S. Multipolar resonance and bandgap formation mechanism of star-shaped lattice structure. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;193:106163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Fan X, Li J, et al. Low-frequency vibration insulation performance of the pyramidal lattice sandwich metamaterial beam. Compos Struct. 2021;278:114719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An X, Lai C, He W, et al. Three-dimensional meta-truss lattice composite structures with vibration isolation performance. Exter Mech Lett. 2019;33:100577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Yang Q, Tao R. SMP-based chiral auxetic mechanical metamaterial with tunable bandgap function. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;195:106267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An X, Lai C, He W, et al. Three-dimensional chiral meta-plate lattice structures for broad band vibration suppression and sound absorption. Compos Part B-Eng. 2021;224:109232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ye H, Wei N, et al. Design optimization of multifunctional metamaterials with tunable thermal expansion and phononic bandgap. Mater Design. 2021;209:109990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Liu X, Yang Q, et al. A novel programmable composite metamaterial with tunable Poisson’s ratio and bandgap based on multi-stable switching. Compos Sci Technol. 2022;219:109245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Yin G, Xie L, et al. Multifunctional 3D lattice metamaterials for vibration mitigation and energy absorption. Int J Mech Sci. 2022;233:107678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Bai Z, Chen Y. Dual-functional hierarchical mechanical metamaterial for vibration insulation and energy absorption. Eng Struct. 2022;271:114916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou S, Dong D, Ren L, et al. Multivariable crashworthiness optimization of vehicle body by unreplicated saturated factorial design. Struct Multidiscip O. 2012;46(6):891–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Ye H, Li B, et al. Mechanical behavior of composite bistable shell structure and surrogate-based optimal design. Struct Multidiscip O. 2021;64(1):303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye H, Zhang Y, Yang Q, et al. Quasi-static analysis and multi-objective optimization for tape spring hinge. Struct Multidiscip O. 2019;60(6):2417–2430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks JS, Ravichandran G. High strain-rate compression behavior of polymeric rod and plate Kelvin lattice structures. Mech Mater. 2022;166:104216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar