Mapping disaster vulnerability in India using analytical hierarchy process

References

• Adger WN. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environ Change. 16:268–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghataher R, Delavar MR, Nami MH, Samnay N. 2008. A fuzzy-AHP decision support system for evaluation of cities vulnerability against earthquakes. World Appl Sci J. 3:66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Arya AS. 1992. Possible effects of a major earthquake in Kangra region of Himachal Pradesh. Curr Sci. 62:251–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkmann J. 2011. First-and second-order adaptation to natural hazards and extreme events in the context of climate change. Nat Hazard. 58:811–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenkert AL, Malone EL. 2005. Modeling vulnerability and resilience to climate change: a case study of India and Indian states. Clim Change. 72:57–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks N, Neil Adger W, Mick Kelly P. 2005. The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environ Change. 15:151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran RV, Ramakrishnan D, Chowdary VM, Jeyaram A, Jha AM. 2006. Flood mapping and analysis using air-borne synthetic aperture radar: a case study of July 2004 flood in Baghmati river basin, Bihar. Curr Sci. 90:249–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark WC, Jäger J, Corell R, Kasperson R, McCarthy JJ, Cash D, Cohen SJ, Desanker P, Dickson NM, Epstein P et al. 2000. Assessing vulnerability to global environmental risks. Discussion paper 2000–12, Environment and Natural Resources Program; Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge (MA).
   Google Scholar
• Cozannet GL, Garcin M, Bulteau T, Mirgon C, Yates ML, Méndez M, Baills A, Idier D, Oliveros C. 2013. An AHP-derived method for mapping the physical vulnerability of coastal areas at regional scales. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci. 13:1209–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J. 2008. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environ Change. 18:598–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Chazal J, Quétier F, Lavorel S, Van Doorn A. 2008. Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems. Global Environ Change. 18: 508–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobhal DP, Gupta AK, Mehta M, Khandelwal DD. 2013. Kedarnath disaster: facts and plausible causes. Curr Sci. 105: 171–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin H, Bojorquez-Tapia LA. 2008. Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis. Global Environ Change. 18:112–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin H, Luers AL. 2006. Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Ann Rev EnvironResour. 31:365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füssel HM. 2007. Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environ Change. 17:155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaiha R, Imai K. 2004. Vulnerability, shocks and persistence of poverty: estimates for semi-arid rural South India. Oxford Dev Stud. 32:261–281.
   Google Scholar
• Gallopín GC. 2006. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environ Change. 16:293–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha-Sapir D, Santos I, Borde A. 2013. The economic impacts of natural disasters. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta HK. 1989. Patterns preceding major earthquakes in north-east India. Curr Sci. 64:889–893.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Dobhal DP, Vaideswaran SC. 2013. August 2012 cloudburst and subsequent flash flood in the Asi Ganga, a tributary of the Bhagirathi river, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Curr Sci. 105, 249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Sah MP. 2008. Impact of the trans-Himalayan landslide lake outburst flood (LLOF) in the Satluj catchment, Himachal Pradesh, India. Nat Hazard. 45:379–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmer M, Hilhorst D. 2006. Natural disasters and climate change. Disasters. 30:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkel J. 2011. Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Global Environ Change. 21:198–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu B, Zhou J, Wang J, Chen Z, Wang D, Xu S. 2009. Risk assessment of land subsidence at Tianjin coastal area in China. Environ Earth Sci. 59:269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2001. Chapter 1, Overview of impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability to climate change. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS, editors. Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation & vulnerability: contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 75–104.
   Google Scholar
• [IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Chapter 19, Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, editors. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 779–810.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen MA, Schoon ML, Ke W, Börner K. 2006. Scholary networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environ Change. 16:240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Turner II BL, Schiller A, Hsieh WH. 2003. Vulnerability to global environmental change. In: Diekmann A, Dietz T, Jaeger C, Rosa ES, Editors. The human dimensions of global environmental change. Cambridge (MA): MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, et al. 2001. Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelkar U, Narula KK, Sharma VP, Chandna U. 2008. Vulnerability and adaptation to climate variability and water stress in Uttarakhand State, India. Global Environ Change. 18: 564–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly PM, Adger WN. 2000. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim. Change. 47:325–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan MS. 1934. The north Bihar Earthquake of the 15th January, 1934. Curr Sci. 2:323–326.
   Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Deng X, Jin Q. 2013. Economic effects of drought on agriculture in North China. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 4:59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luers AL, Lobell DB, Sklar LS, Addams CL, Matson PA. 2003. A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environ Change. 13:255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskrey A. 1989. Disaster mitigation: a community based approach. Dev Guidel. 3:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow BH. 1999. Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters. 23:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss RH, Brenkert AL, Malone EL. 2001. Vulnerability to climate change: a quantitative approach. Prepared for the US Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL-SA-33642). Washington (DC): Battelle Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Naik BS, Panda RK, Jakhar P, Dass A, Madhu M. 2013. Appraisal of the erosion status in the eastern coastal region of India. Indian J Soil Conservation. 41:121–126.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien G, O’Keefe P, Rose J, Wisner B. 2006. Climate change and disaster management. Disasters. 30:64–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien K, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J. 2004. Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Global Environ Change. 14:303–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hare G. 2001. Hurricane 07B in the Godavari Delta, Andhra Pradesh, India: vulnerability, mitigation and the spatial impact. Geogr J. 167:23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özerdem A, Jacoby T. 2006. Disaster management and civil society: earthquake relief in Japan, Turkey and India. London: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Paul GC, Ismail AIM. 2013. Contribution of offshore islands in the prediction of water levels due to tide-surge interaction for the coastal region of Bangladesh. Nat Hazard. 65:13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C. 2012. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazard. 63:965–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad AK, Singh RP. 2005. Extreme rainfall event of July 25–27, 2005 over Mumbai, West Coast, India. J Indian Soc Remote Sensing. 33:365–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston BL, Yuen EJ, Westaway RM. 2011. Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustainability Sci. 6:177–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propastin P. 2013. Assessment of climate and human induced disaster risk over shared water resources in the Balkhash Lake drainage basin. In: Climate change and disaster risk management. Springer: Heidelberg; p. 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman A. 2008. A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr. 28:32–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MR, Shi ZH, Chongfa C. 2009. Soil erosion hazard evaluation – an integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and statistical approaches with biophysical parameters towards management strategies. Ecol Modelling. 220:1724–1734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendran K, Rajendran CP, Thakkar M, Tuttle MP. 2001. The 2001 Kutch (Bhuj) earthquake: coseismic surface features and their significance. Curr Sci. 80:1397–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan R. 2001. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. J Environ Manage. 63:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy M, Venema HD. 2002. Reducing risk and vulnerability to climate change in India: the capabilities approach. Gend Dev. 10:78–83.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci. 1:83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal J, Lu XX. 2005. Remote sensing and GIS-based flood vulnerability assessment of human settlements: a case study of Gangetic West Bengal, India. Hydrol Process. 19:3699–3716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper L, Pelling M. 2006. Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters. 30:19–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma PK, Chopra R, Verma VK, Thomas A. 1996. Technical note flood management using remote sensing technology: the Punjab (India) experience. Int J Remote Sensing. 17:3511–3521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SVSP, Rao GS, Bhanumurthy V. 2012. Development of village-wise flood risk index map using multi-temporal satellite data: a study of Nagaon district, Assam, India. Curr Sci. 103:705–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovich J, Sharabi M. 2013. Dealing with environmental disaster: the intervention of Community Emergency Teams (CET) in the 2010 Israeli forest fire disaster. J Sustainable Dev. 6:86–93.
   Google Scholar
• Singh RP, Kumar R, Tare V. 2009. Variability of soil wetness and its relation with floods over the Indian subcontinent. Can J Remote Sensing. 35:85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha AK. 2003. Development of an integrated disaster management system in India: importance of reliable information. Paper presented at: The International Conference on Total Disaster Risk Management; Kobe. p. 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha R, Bapalu GV, Singh LK, Rath B. 2008. Flood risk analysis in the Kosi river basin, north Bihar using multi-parametric approach of analytical hierarchy process (AHP). J Indian Soc Remote Sensing. 36:335–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit B, Wandel J. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environ Change. 16:282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripati S, Unnikrishnan AS. 2011. Role of cyclones and other factors in the decline of the ports of northern Orissa. Curr Sci. 100:305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, et al. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 100:8074–8079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnikrishnan AS, RameshKumar MR, Sindhu B. 2011. Tropical cyclones in the Bay of Bengal and extreme sea-level projections along the east coast of India in a future climate scenario. Curr Sci. 101:327–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdiya KS. 1993. Latur earthquake of 30 September 1993: implications and planning for hazard-preparedness. Curr Sci. 65:515–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aalst MK. 2006. The impacts of climate change on the risk of natural disasters. Disasters. 30:5–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Liang T, Huang X, Feng Q, Xie H, Liu X, Chen M, Wang X. 2013. Early warning of snow-caused disasters in pastoral areas on the Tibetan Plateau. Nat Hazard Earth Sys Sci. 13:1411–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisner B, Luce HR. 1993. Disaster vulnerability: scale, power and daily life. GeoJournal. 30:127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Ying X, Zeng GM, Chen GQ, Tang L, Wang KL, Huang DY. 2007. Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality – a case study of Hunan Province, China. Ecol Modelling. 209:97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimatsu H, Abe S. 2006. A review of landslide hazards in Japan and assessment of their susceptibility using an analytical hierarchic process (AHP) method. Landslides. 3:149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar