UAV photogrammetry in the post-earthquake scenario: case studies in L'Aquila

References

• Agisoft Photoscan [ Internet]. 2011. [cited 2014 May 20]. Available from: http://www.agisoft.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadabadian AH, Robson S, Boehm J, Shortis M, Wenzel K, Fritsch D. 2013. A comparison of dense matching algorithms for scaled surface reconstruction using stereo camera rigs. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 78:157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apollonio FI, Ballabeni A, Gaiani M, Remondino F. 2014. Evaluation of feature-based methods for automated network orientation. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inform Sci. 5:47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Arias-Pérez B, González-Aguilera D, Gómez-Lahoz J, Hernández-López D. 2012. Assessment of stereoscopic precision – film to digital photogrammetric cameras, special applications of photogrammetry. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/special-applications-of-photogrammetry/assessment-of-stereoscopic-precision-film-to-digital-photogrammetric-cameras
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi V, Dominici D, Giannone F, Zucconi M. 2012. Rapid building damage assessment using EROS B data: the case study of L'Aquila earthquake. Ital J Remote Sens. 44:153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barazzetti L, Forlani G, Remondino F, Roncella R, Scaioni M. 2011. Experiences and achievements in automated image sequence orientation for close-range photogrammetric projects. Proceedings SPIE 8085, Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XI, 80850F; 2011 May 23; Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. 2008. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Comput. Vis Image Understand. 110:346–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civil Protection [ Internet]. Un anno in dieci punti: 6 aprile 2009–6 aprile 2010 [One year in ten points: 6 April 2009–6 April 2010; [updated 2010 March, cited 2015 Aug 29]. Available from: http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/jcms/it/emergenza_abruzzo_unanno.wp#sopralluoghi
   Google Scholar
• Dominici D, Zavino A, Alicandro M, Elaiopoulos M, Baiocchi V. 2012, Micro UAV for post seismic hazards surveying in old city center of L'Aquila. Proceedings of the FIG Working Week; 2012 May; Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenbeiss H. 2009. UAV photogrammetry. Zurich: ETH.
   Google Scholar
• Erdas Imagine Hexagon Geospatial [Internet]. 2013. [cited 2015 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.hexagongeospatial.com/products/producer-suite/erdas-imagine
   Google Scholar
• Fraser CS. 1997. Digital camera self-calibration. ISPRS J Photogramm. Remote Sens. 52:149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa Y, Ponce J. 2010. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. Pattern Anal. Mach Intell. 32:1362–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenzdörffer GJ, Guretzki M, Friedlander I. 2008. Photogrammetric image acquisition and image analysis of oblique imagery. Photogramm Rec. 23:372–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschmüller H. 2008. Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information. Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 30:328–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten TP, Lindstaedt M. 2012. Image-based low-cost systems for automatic 3D recording and modelling of archaeological finds and objects. Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. Proceedings of 4th International Conference EuroMed; 2012 Oct–Nov 29; Lemessos.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus K. 2000. Photogrammetry, volume 1, Fundamentals and standard processes. Koln: Dummler.
   Google Scholar
• Küng O, Strecha C, Beyeler A, Zufferey JC, Floreano D, Fua P, Gervaix F. 2011. The accuracy of automatic photogrammetric techniques on ultra-light UAV imagery. In UAV-g 2011-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics (UAV-g); 2011 Sep 14–16; Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Leachtenauer JC, Driggers RG. 2001. Surveillance and Reconnaissance Imaging System: modeling and performance prediction. Boston (MA): Artech House
   Google Scholar
• Lowe DG. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis. 60:91–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. 2005. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 27:1615–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrot Deseilligny M, Clery I. 2011. Apero, an open source bundle adjustment software for automatic calibration and orientation of set of images. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXVIII–5/W16. Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop; 2011 March 2–4; Trento.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrot-Deseilligny M, Paparoditis N. 2006. A multiresolution and optimization-based image matching approach: an application to surface reconstruction from SPOT5-HRS stereo imagery. IAPRS. Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop on Topographic Mapping from Space (With Special Emphasis on Small Satellites); 2006 Feb; Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Pix4D [ Internet]. 2013. [cited 2014 Oct 7]. Available from: https://pix4d.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Remondino, F. 2006. Detectors and descriptors for photogrammetric applications. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inform Sci. 3:49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Remondino F, Del Pizzo S, Kersten TP, Troisi S. 2012. Low-cost and open-source solutions for automated image orientation – a critical overview. Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. Proceedings of 4th International Conference EuroMed; 2012 Oct–Nov 29; Lemessos.
   Google Scholar
• Rupnik E, Nex F, Remondino F. 2014. Oblique multi-camera systems–orientation and dense matching issues. In International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-3/W1. Proceedings of European Calibration and Orientation Workshop; 2014 Feb 12–14; Castelldefels.
   Google Scholar
• Seitz SM, Curless B, Diebel J, Scharstein D, Szeliski R. 2006. A comparison and evaluation of multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. Computer vision and pattern recognition. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference; 2006 Jun 17–22; New York.
   Google Scholar
• Snavely N, Seitz SM, Szeliski R. 2007. Modeling the World from internet photo collections. Int J Comput Vis. 80:189–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triggs B, Zisserman A, Szeliski R. 2000. Bundle adjustment. A modern synthesis. Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice. Proceedings of International Workshop on Vision Algorithms; 1999 Sep 21–22; Corfu. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tong X, Hong Z, Liu S, Zhang X, Xie H, Li Z, Yang S, Wang W, Bao F. 2012. Building-damage detection using pre-and post-seismic high-resolution satellite stereo imagery: a case study of the May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 68:13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VisualSFM: A Visual Structure from Motion System [ Internet]. 2011. [cited 2015 Jun 3]. Available from: http://ccwu.me/vsfm/doc.html.
   Google Scholar
• Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM. 2012. Structure-from-motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology. 179:300–314. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X12004217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Yang J, Peng C, Wu Y, Jiang X, Li R, Zheng Y, Gao Y, Liu S, Tian B. 2014. Development of an UAS for post-earthquake disaster surveying and its application in Ms7.0 Lushan Earthquake, Sichuan, China. Comput Geosci. 68:22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar