Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale using data mining and GIScience technology: application to Urumqi (China)

References

• Agrawal R, Imielinski T, Swami AN. 1993. Mining Association Rules Between Sets of Items in Large Databases, SIGMOD Conference.
   Google Scholar
• An J, Bai X, Xu J, Nie G, Wang X. 2015. Prediction of highway blockage caused by earthquake-induced landslides for improving earthquake emergency response. Nat Hazards. 79(1):511–536.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetti D, Petrini V. 1984. Sulla vulnerabilita sismica di edifici in muratura: un metodo di valutazione. A method for evaluating the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings. Lindustria Delle Costruzioni. 18:66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Campostrini GP, Taffarel S, Bettiol G, Valluzzi MR, Da Porto F, Modena C. 2017. A Bayesian approach to rapid seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale. Int J Archit Heritage. 12:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CS, Cheng MY, Wu YW. 2012. Seismic assessment of school buildings in Taiwan using the evolutionary support vector machine inference system. Exp Syst Appl. 39(4):4102–4110.
   Google Scholar
• Cherif S-E, Chourak M, Abed M, Pujades L. 2016. Seismic risk in the city of Al Hoceima (north of Morocco) using the vulnerability index method, applied in Risk-UE project. Nat Hazards. 85(1):329–347.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn A, Spence R. 2003. Earthquake protection. New York: Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V. 1995. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 20(3):273–297.
   Google Scholar
• Costanzo A, Montuori A, Silva J, Silvestri M, Musacchio M, Doumaz F, Stramondo S, Buongiorno M. 2016. The combined use of airborne remote sensing techniques within a GIS environment for the seismic vulnerability assessment of urban areas: an operational application. Remote Sens. 8(2):146.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar S, Rai AK, Nayak P. 2016. Estimation of seismic hazard in Odisha by remote sensing and GIS techniques. Nat Hazards. 86(2):695–709.
   Google Scholar
• Fayyad U, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P. 1996. From data mining to knowledge discovery: an overview. Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Menlo Park: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira TM, Maio R, Vicente R. 2016. Seismic vulnerability assessment of the old city centre of Horta, Azores: calibration and application of a seismic vulnerability index method. Bull Earthq Eng. 15(7):2879–2899.
   Google Scholar
• Geiß C, Pelizari PA, Marconcini M, Sengara W, Edwards M, Lakes T, Taubenböck H. 2015a. Estimation of seismic building structural types using multi-sensor remote sensing and machine learning techniques. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 104:175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Geiß C, Taubenböck H. 2013. Remote sensing contributing to assess earthquake risk: from a literature review towards a roadmap. Nat Hazards. 68(1):7–48.
   Google Scholar
• Geiß C, Taubenböck H. 2017. One step back for a leap forward: toward operational measurements of elements at risk. Nat Hazards. 86(S1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Geiß C, Taubenböck H, Tyagunov S, Tisch A, Post J, Lakes T. 2014. Assessment of seismic building vulnerability from space. Earthq Spectra. 30(4):1553–1583.
   Google Scholar
• Geiß C, Wurm M, Breunig M, Felbier A, Taubenbock H. 2015b. Normalization of TanDEM-X DSM data in urban environments with morphological filters. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 53(8):4348–4362.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T. 2017. Multi-criteria risk evaluation by integrating an analytical network process approach into GIS-based sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk. 9:127–151.
   Google Scholar
• Grünthal G. 1998. European macroseismic scale 1998. European Seismological Commission (ESC).
   Google Scholar
• Guéguen P, Michel C, LeCorre L. 2007. A simplified approach for vulnerability assessment in moderate-to-low seismic hazard regions: application to Grenoble (France). Bull Earthq Eng. 5(3):467–490.
   Google Scholar
• Guettiche A, Guéguen P, Mimoune M. 2017. Seismic vulnerability assessment using association rule learning: application to the city of Constantine, Algeria. Nat Hazards. 86(3):1223–1245.
   Google Scholar
• Huang X, Xia J, Xiao R, He T. 2017. Urban expansion patterns of 291 Chinese cities, 1990–2015. Int J Digit Earth. 57:2802–2812.
   Google Scholar
• Ji J, Xu Z, Gao X. 2016. Analysis of seismic vulnerability of rural houses in china. In: D'Amico S, editor. Earthquakes and their impact on society. Springer Natural Hazards. Cham: Springer; p. 363–375.
   Google Scholar
• Jia H, Pan D, Wang J-A, Zhang W-C. 2016. Risk mapping of integrated natural disasters in China. Nat Hazards. 80(3):2023–2035.
   Google Scholar
• Jia K, Zhou S, Zhuang J, Jiang C. 2014. Possibility of the Independence between the 2013 Lushan Earthquake and the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake on Longmen Shan Fault, Sichuan, China. Seismol Res Lett. 85(1):60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik HB, Dasgupta K. 2013. Assessment of Seismic Vulnerability of Structures in Sikkim, India, Based on Damage Observation during Two Recent Earthquakes. J Perform Constr Facil. 27(6):697–720.
   Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I. 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides. 11(3):425–439.
   Google Scholar
• Kircher CA, Whitman RV, Holmes WT. 2006. HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods. Nat Hazards Rev. 7(2):45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz M, Kemper T, Geiß C, Esch T, Taubenböck H. 2016. How good is the map? A multi-scale cross-comparison framework for global settlement layers: Evidence from Central Europe. Remote Sens Environ. 178:191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino S. 2006. On the vulnerability assessment of monumental buildings. Bull Earthq Eng. 4(4):445–463.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S. 2006. Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng. 4(4):415–443.
   Google Scholar
• Lang K, Bachmann H. 2004. On the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings: a case study of the city of Basel. Earthq Spectra. 20(1):43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lantada N, Irizarry J, Barbat AH, Goula X, Roca A, Susagna T, Pujades LG. 2009. Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method. Bull Earthq Eng. 8(2):201–229.
   Google Scholar
• Lestuzzi P, Podestà S, Luchini C, Garofano A, Kazantzidou-Firtinidou D, Bozzano C, Bischof P, Haffter A, Rouiller J-D. 2016. Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale for two typical Swiss cities using Risk-UE methodology. Nat Hazards. 84(1):249–269.
   Google Scholar
• Lin X, Zhang H, Chen H, Chen H, Lin J. 2015. Field investigation on severely damaged aseismic buildings in 2014 Ludian earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Vib. 14(1):169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Linoff GS, Berry MJA. 1997. Data mining technique: for marketing, sales, and customer support. Indianapolis: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Liu F, Zhang Z, Wang X. 2016. Forms of urban expansion of Chinese municipalities and provincial capitals, 1970s–2013. Remote Sens. 8(11):930.
   Google Scholar
• Lixin Y, Ke C, Xiaoying C, Yueling S, Xiaoqing C, Ye H. 2017. Analysis of social vulnerability of residential community to hazards in Tianjin, China. Nat Hazards. 87(2):1223–1243.
   Google Scholar
• Mück M, Taubenböck H, Post J, Wegscheider S, Strunz G, Sumaryono S, Ismail FA. 2012. Assessing building vulnerability to earthquake and tsunami hazard using remotely sensed data. Nat Hazards. 68(1):97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Maio R, Ferreira TM, Vicente R, Estêvão J. 2016. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: case study of the old city centre of Faro, Portugal. J Risk Res. 19(5):551–580.
   Google Scholar
• Matsui T. 2007. Sloshing in a cylindrical liquid storage tank with a single-deck type floating roof under seismic excitation. J Press Vessel Technol. 131: 021303.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi M, Delavar MR, Moshiri B. 2014. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for seismic vulnerability assessment using quantifier-guided OWA operator: a case study of Tehran, Iran. Ann GIS. 21(3):209–222.
   Google Scholar
• Mouroux P, Le Brun B. 2008. Risk-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with application to different European towns. In: Oliveira CS, Roca A, Goula X, editors. Assessing and managing earthquake risk. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 479–508.
   Google Scholar
• Omidvar B, Gatmiri B, Derakhshan S. 2012. Experimental vulnerability curves for the residential buildings of Iran. Nat Hazards. 60(2):345–365.
   Google Scholar
• Panagiota M, Jocelyn C, Erwan P, Philippe G. 2013. A support vector regression approach for building seismic vulnerability assessment and evaluation from remote sensing and in-situ data. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Piatetsky-Shapiro G. 1991. Discovery, analysis, and presentation of strong rules. In: Knowledge discovery in databases. Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MITPress.
   Google Scholar
• Qi W, Su G, Sun L, Yang F, Wu Y. 2016. Internet+” approach to mapping exposure and seismic vulnerability of buildings in a context of rapid socioeconomic growth: a case study in Tangshan, China. Nat Hazards. 86(S1):107–139.
   Google Scholar
• Qu Y, Huang C, Zhang P, Zhang J. 2011. Microblogging after a major disaster in China: a case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. In: CSCW '11 Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work; p. 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel I, Guéguen P, Dalla Mura M, Pathier E, Leduc T, Chanussot J. 2015. Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban environments in moderate-to-low seismic hazard regions using association rule learning and support vector machine methods. Nat Hazards. 76(2):1111–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel I, Gueguen P, Dunand F, Cottaz S. 2014. Macroscale vulnerability assessment of cities using association rule learning. Seismol Res Lett. 85(2):295–305.
   Google Scholar
• Santos C, Ferreira TM, Vicente R, da Silva JRM. 2013. Building typologies identification to support risk mitigation at the urban scale–Case study of the old city centre of Seixal, Portugal. J Cult Heritage. 14(6):449–463.
   Google Scholar
• Şen Z. 2010. Rapid visual earthquake hazard evaluation of existing buildings by fuzzy logic modeling. Exp Syst Appl. 37(8):5653–5660.
   Google Scholar
• Şen Z. 2011. Supervised fuzzy logic modeling for building earthquake hazard assessment. Exp Syst Appl. 38(12):14564–14573.
   Google Scholar
• Shen J, Song H. 2008. Brief introduction on the predominant results of the active fault detecting and seismic risk assessment in Urumqi City. Seismol Geol. 30(1):273–288.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj T, Tesfamariam S, Dueñas-Osorio L. 2014. Seismic risk assessment of high-voltage transformers using Bayesian belief networks. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 11(7):929–943.
   Google Scholar
• Su G, Qi W, Zhang S, Sim T, Liu X, Sun R, Sun L, Jin Y. 2015. An integrated method combining remote sensing data and local knowledge for the large-scale estimation of seismic loss risks to buildings in the context of rapid socioeconomic growth: a case study in Tangshan, China. Remote Sens. 7(3):2543–2601.
   Google Scholar
• Tertulliani A, Arcoraci L, Berardi M, Bernardini F, Camassi R, Castellano C, Del Mese S, Ercolani E, Graziani L, Leschiutta I, et al. 2011. An application of EMS98 in a medium-sized city: The case of L’Aquila (Central Italy) after the April 6, 2009 Mw 6.3 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng. 9(1):67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam S, Liu Z. 2010. Earthquake induced damage classification for reinforced concrete buildings. Struct Saf. 32(2):154–164.
   Google Scholar
• Wei B, Nie G, Su G, Sun L, Bai X, Qi W. 2017. Risk assessment of people trapped in earthquake based on km grid: a case study of the 2014 Ludian earthquake, China. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):1289–1305.
   Google Scholar
• Wei B, Su G, Liu F. 2013. Public response to earthquake disaster: a case study in Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. Nat Hazards. 69(1):441–458.
   Google Scholar
• Wieland M, Pittore M, Parolai S, Zschau J, Moldobekov B, Begaliev U. 2012. Estimating building inventory for rapid seismic vulnerability assessment: towards an integrated approach based on multi-source imaging. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 36:70–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H, Cheng Z, Shi W, Miao Z, Xu C. 2014. An object-based image analysis for building seismic vulnerability assessment using high-resolution remote sensing imagery. Nat Hazards. 71(1):151–174.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Zhao Q, Zhang B, Wu W. 2017. Characterizing the seasonal crustal motion in tianshan area using GPS, GRACE and surface loading models. Remote Sens. 9(12):1303.
   Google Scholar
• Xu C, Xu XW. 2012. Spatial prediction models for seismic landslides based on support vector machine and varied kernel functions: a case study of the 14 April 2010 Yushu earthquake in China. Chin J Geophys. 55(6):666–679.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, An J, Nie G. 2016. A quick earthquake disaster loss assessment method supported by dasymetric data for emergency response in China. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 16(3):885–899.
   Google Scholar
• Yang S, Li J, Wang Q. 2008. The deformation pattern and fault rate in the Tianshan Mountains inferred from GPS observations. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci. 51(8):1064–1080.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong NG, Ying CJ, Qiang LZ, Wu SG, Guo GJ, Min LH. 2002. The construction of basic database for earthquake emergency response. Earthquake. 22(3):105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Liu Y, Wu W, Li N. 2015. Integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards in China. Nat Hazards. 78(1):257–280.
   Google Scholar