Flash flood risk assessment in urban arid environment: case study of Taibah and Islamic universities’ campuses, Medina, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

References

• Abdulrazzak M, Al-Shabani A, Noor K, Elfeki A, Kamis A. 2018a. Integrating hydrological and hydraulic modelling for flood risk management in a high-resolution urbanized area: case study Taibah University Campus, KSA. Recent advances in environmental science from the Euro-Mediterranean and surrounding regions, 01/2018, Cham: Springer, pp. 827–829; ISBN: 978-3-319-70547-7, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-70548-4_243
   Google Scholar
• Abdulrazzak M, EA, Kamis AS, Kassab M, Alamri N. 2018b. Flood mitigation in Taibah and Islamic universities campuses and downstream areas, Medina. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). Unpublished Final Report. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elfeki A, Al-Shabani A, Bahrawi J, Alzahrani S. 2018. Quick urban flood risk assessment in arid environment using HECRAS and dam break theory: case study of Daghbag Dam in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Recent Advances in Environmental Science from the Euro-Mediterranean and Surrounding Regions, 01/2018, Cham: Springer, pp. 1917–1919; ISBN: 978-3-319-70547-7, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-70548-4_553
   Google Scholar
• Elfeki A, Bahrawi J. 2017. Application of the random walk theory for simulation of flood hazards: Jeddah flood 25 November 2009. IJEM. 13(2):169–182.
   Google Scholar
• Elfeki AM, Ewea HA, Al-Amri NS. 2014. Development of storm hyetographs for flood forecasting in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. 7(10):4387–4398.
   Google Scholar
• Elfeki A, Masoud M, Niyazi B. 2017. Integrated rainfall-runoff and flood inundation modeling for flash flood risk assessment under data scarcity in arid regions: Wadi Fatimah basin case study, Saudi Arabia. Nat Haz. 85(1):87–109.
   Google Scholar
• Elkharchy I. 2015. Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite images and GIS tools: a case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 18:216–278.
   Google Scholar
• Ewea HA, Elfeki AM, Bahrawi JA, Al-Amri NS. 2016. Sensitivity analysis of runoff hydrographs due to temporal rainfall patterns in Makkah Al-Mukkramah region, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. 9:424.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. 2004. HAZUS-MH. FEMA’s methodology for estimating potential losses from disasters. US Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/index.shtm
   Google Scholar
• Forkuo EK. 2011. Flood hazard mapping using Aster Image data with GIS. Int J Geomat Geosci. 1(4):932–950.
   Google Scholar
• Gaubi I, Chaabani A, Ben Mammou A, Hamza MH. 2016. A GIS-based soil erosion prediction using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) (Lebna watershed, Cap Bon, Tunisia). Nat. Hazards, 86(1):219–239. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2684-3.
   Google Scholar
• Haan CT. 1977. Statistical methods in hydrology. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE). 2001. Reducing risks, protecting people – HSE’s decision making process. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Kite GW. 1978. Frequency and risk analyses in hydrology. 2nd ed. Littleton, CO: Water Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra SK, Singh VP. 2003. SCS-CN method. Part-II, analytical treatment. Acta Geo-Phys Polon. 51(1):107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Moser DA. 1997. The use of risk analysis by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers . Alexandria, VA: Institute for Water Resources, USACE. p. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Nasiri H, Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh S. 2013. Flood vulnerability index as a knowledge base for flood risk assessment in urban area. J Nov Appl Sci. 2(8):266–269.
   Google Scholar
• Ozsoy G, Aksoy E, Dirim MS, Tumsavas Z. 2012. Determination of soil erosion risk in the Mustafakemalpasa River Basin, Turkey, using the revised universal soil loss equation, geographic information system, and remote sensing. Environ Manag. 50(4):679–694.
   Google Scholar
• Priess JA, Schweitzer C, Batkhishig O, Koschitzki T, Wurbs D. 2013. Impacts of agricultural land-use dynamics on erosion risks and options for land and water management in Northern Mongolia. Environ Earth Sci. 73(2): 697–708. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3380-9
   Google Scholar
• Sharif HO, Al-Juaidi FH, Al-Othman A, Al-Dousary I, Fadda E, Jamal-Uddeen S, Elhassan A. 2016. Flood hazards in an urbanizing watershed in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Geomat Nat Haz Risk. 7(2):702–720.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha R, Bapalu GV, Singh LK, Rath B. 2008. Flood risk analysis in the Kosi river basin, north Bihar using multi-parametric approach of analytical hierarchy process (AHP). J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 36(4):335–349.
   Google Scholar
• US Army Corps of Engineers HEC-HMS. 2016. http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms/
   Google Scholar
• US Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS. 2016. http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/
   Google Scholar
• Viessman W, Knapp JW, Lewis GR, Harbaugh TE. 1977. Introduction to hydrology. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Vojtek M, Vojteková J. 2016. Flood hazard and flood risk assessment at the local spatial scale: a case study. Geomat Nat Haz Risk. 7(6):1973–1992.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson ME, Quinn PF, Hewett CJM. 2013. The floods and agriculture risk matrix: a decision support tool for effectively communicating flood risk from farmed landscapes. Int J River Basin Manag. 11(3):237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Winter B, Schneeberger K, Huttenlau M, Stötter J. 2018. Sources of uncertainty in a probabilistic flood risk model. Nat Haz. 91(2):431–446.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D-W, Quan J, Zhang H-B, Wang F, Wang H, He X-y. 2015. Flash flood hazard mapping: a pilot case study in Xiapu River Basin, China. Water Sci Eng. 8(3):195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Zonensein J, Miguez MG, Magalhaes LPC, Valentin MG, Mascarenhhas FCB. 2008. Flood risk index as an urban management tool, 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: IWA.
   Google Scholar