Flood map boundary sensitivity due to combined effects of DEM resolution and roughness in relation to model performance

References

• Apel H, Aronica GT, Kreibich H, Thieken AH. 2009. Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?. Nat Hazards. 49(1):79–98. doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8
   Google Scholar
• Aronica G, Bates PD, Horritt MS. 2002. Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE. Hydrol Process. 16(10):2001–2016. doi:10.1002/hyp.398
   Google Scholar
• Aronica G, Hankin B, Beven K. 1998. Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data. Adv Water Resour. 22(4):349–365.
   Google Scholar
• Bates PD, de Roo APJ. 2000. A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. J Hydrol. 236(1–2):54–77.
   Google Scholar
• Bates PD, Horritt MS, Fewtrell TJ. 2010. A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. J Hydrol. 387(1–2):33–45. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027
   Google Scholar
• Beven KJ. 2009. Environmental modelling: an uncertain future. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt SA. 2016. Modeling and visualizing uncertainties of flood boundary delineation: algorithm for slope and DEM resolution dependencies of 1D hydraulic models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 30(6):1677–1690. doi:10.1007/s00477-016-1212-z
   Google Scholar
• Brandt SA, Lim NJ. 2012. Importance of river bank and floodplain slopes on the accuracy of flood inundation mapping. In: Murillo Muñoz R., editor. River flow 2012. San José, Costa Rica: CRC Press/Balkema (Taylor & Francis); p. 1015–1020.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt SA, Lim NJ. 2016. Visualising DEM-related flood-map uncertainties using a disparity-distance equation algorithm. In: Schumann AH, editor. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS): The spatial dimensions of water management - Redistribution of benefits and risks. Bochum, Germany: Copernicus; p. 153–159. doi:10.5194/piahs-373-153-2016
   Google Scholar
• Cook A, Merwade V. 2009. Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. J Hydrol. 377(1–2):131–142. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.015
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard TJ, Neal JC, Bates PD, Ramirez J, de Almeida GAM, Hancock GR. 2013. Integrating the LISFLOOD-FP 2D hydrodynamic model with the CAESAR model: implications for modelling landscape evolution. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 38(15):1897–1906. doi:10.1002/esp.3478
   Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Montanari A. 2009. Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 13(6):913–921.
   Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Schumann G, Bates PD, Freer J, Beven K. 2010. Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Hydrol Sci J. 55(3):364–376. doi:10.1080/02626661003683389
   Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Uhlenbrook S. 2012. Is the current flood of data enough? A treatise on research needs for the improvement of flood modelling. Hydrol Process. 6:153–158. doi:10.1002/hyp.8226
   Google Scholar
• Fewtrell TJ, Bates PD, Horritt MS, Hunter N. 2008. Evaluating the effect of scale in flood inundation modelling in urban environments. Hydrol Process. 22(26):5107–5118. doi:10.1002/hyp.7148
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild MF. 1993. Data models and data quality: problems and prospects. In: Goodchild MF, Parks BO, Steyaert LT, editors. Environmental modeling with GIS. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; p. 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hall JW, Tarantola S, Bates PD, Horritt MS. 2005. Distributed sensitivity analysis of flood inundation model calibration. J Hydraul Eng. 131(2):117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Horritt MS. 2006. A methodology for the validation of uncertain flood inundation models. J Hydrol. 326(1–4):153–165. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.027
   Google Scholar
• Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2001. Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow. J Hydrol. 253(1–4):239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2002. Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol. 268(1–4):87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Horritt MS, Bates PD, Mattinson MJ. 2006. Effects of mesh resolution and topographic representation in 2D finite volume models of shallow water fluvial flow. J Hydrol. 329(1–2):306–314.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter N, Bates PD, Horritt MS, De Roo APJ, Werner M. 2005. Utility of different data types for calibrating flood inundation models within a GLUE framework. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 9(4):412–430. doi:10.5194/hess-9-412-2005
   Google Scholar
• Hunter N, Bates PD, Horritt MS, Wilson MD. 2007. Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review. Geomorphology. 90(3–4):208–225.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter N, Horritt MS, Bates PD, Wilson M, Werner M. 2005. An adaptive time step solution for raster-based storage cell modelling of floodplain inundation. Adv Water Resour. 28(9):975–991. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Gävleborg L. 2015. Riskhanteringsplan för översvämning av Voxnan/Edsbyn.
   Google Scholar
• Lim NJ. 2009. Topographic data and roughness parameterisation effects on 1D flood inundation models. Sweden: University of Gävle.
   Google Scholar
• Lim NJ, Brandt SA, Seipel S. 2016. Visualisation and evaluation of flood uncertainties based on ensemble modelling. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 30(2):240–262. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1085539
   Google Scholar
• Mason DC, Bates PD, Dall’ Amico JT. 2009. Calibration of uncertain flood inundation models using remotely sensed water levels. J Hydrol. 368(1–4):224–236. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.034
   Google Scholar
• Mason DC, Cobby DM, Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2003. Floodplain friction parameterization in two-dimensional river flood-models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrol Process. 17(9):1711–1732. doi:10.1002/hyp.1270
   Google Scholar
• Mukolwe MM, Di Baldassarre G, Werner M, Solomatine DP. 2014. Flood modelling: parameterisation and inflow uncertainty. Water Management. 167(WM1):51-60. doi:10.1680/wama.12.00087
   Google Scholar
• Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap (MSB) 2011. Identifiering av områden med betydande över­ svämningsrisk.
   Google Scholar
• Neal JC, Bates PD, Fewtrell TJ, Hunter N, Wilson MD, Horritt MS. 2009. Distributed whole city water level measurements from Carlisle 2005 flood event and comparison with hydraulic model simulations. J Hydrol. 368(1–4):42–55.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson S, Berggren O. 1966. Redogörelse För Utförda Observationer av Vattenstånd i Testeboån på Sträckan Strömsbro––Åbyggeby under Våren. 1966
   Google Scholar
• Papaioannou G, Loukas A, Vasiliades L, Aronica GT. 2016. Flood inundation mapping sensitivity to riverine spatial resolution and modelling approach. Nat Hazards. 83(S1):117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Papaioannou G, Vasiliades L, Loukas A, Aronica GT. 2017. Probabilistic flood inundation mapping at ungauged streams due to roughness coefficient uncertainty in hydraulic modelling. Adv Geosci. 44:23–34. doi:10.5194/adgeo-44-23-2017
   Google Scholar
• Pappenberger F, Beven KJ, Horritt MS, Blazkova S. 2005. Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations. J Hydrol. 302(1–4):46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Pappenberger F, Matgen P, Beven KJ, Henry J-B, Pfister L, Fraipont P. 2006. Influence of uncertainty boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions. Adv Water Resour. 29(10):1430–1449.
   Google Scholar
• Peña F, Nardi F. 2018. Floodplain terrain analysis for coarse resolution 2D flood modelling. Hydrology. 5(4):52. doi:10.3390/hydrology5040052
   Google Scholar
• Penton DJ, Overton IC. 2007. Spatial modelling of floodplain inundation combining satellite imagery and elevation models. In MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand (pp. 74–80).
   Google Scholar
• Romanowicz R, Beven K. 2003. Estimation of flood inundation probabilities as conditioned on event inundation maps. Water Resour Res. 39(3):1061-1073. doi:10.1029/2001WR001056
   Google Scholar
• Saksena S, Merwade V. 2015. Incorporating the effect of DEM resolution and accuracy for improved flood inundation mapping. J Hydrol. 530:180–194. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.069
   Google Scholar
• Savage JTS, Pianosi F, Bates PD, Freer J, Wagener T. 2016. Quantifying the importance of spatial resolution and other factors through global sensitivity analysis of a flood inundation model. Water Resour Res. 52(11):9146–9163. doi:10.1002/2015WR018198
   Google Scholar
• Schumann G, Matgen P, Cutler MEJ, Black A, Hoffmann L, Pfister L. 2008. Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sensing. 63(3):283–296.
   Google Scholar
• Schumann G, Matgen P, Hoffmann L, Hostache R, Pappenberger F, Pfister L. 2007. Deriving distributed roughness values from satellite radar data for flood inundation modelling. J Hydrol. 344(1–2):96–111.
   Google Scholar
• Vivoni ER, Ivanov V, Bras Rafael L, Entekhabi D. 2005. On the effects of triangulated terrain resolution on distributed hydrologic model response. Hydrol Process. 19(11):2101–2122. doi:10.1002/hyp.5671
   Google Scholar
• Wang YJ, Colby D, Mulcahy KA. 2002. An efficient method for mapping flood extent in a coastal floodplain using Landsat TM and DEM data. Int J Remote Sens. 23(18):3681–3696.
   Google Scholar
• Yu D, Lane SN. 2006. Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional-wave treatment, part 1: mesh resolution effects. Hydrol Process. 20(7):1541–1565.
   Google Scholar