Soil liquefaction potential in Kahramanmaras, Turkey

References

• Alptekin O. 1973. Focal mechanism of earthquakes in Western Turkey and their tectonic implications [PhD dissertation]. USA: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ambraseys NN. 1970. Some characteristic features of the Anatolian fault zone. Tectonophysics. 9(2–3):143–165.
   Google Scholar
• Ambraseys NN, Jackson JA. 1998. Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the eastern Mediterranean region. Geophys J Int. 133:390–406.
   Google Scholar
• Ambraseys NN. 1989. Temporary seismic quiescence: SE Turkey. Geophys J. 96(2):311–331.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews DCA, Martin GR. 2000. Criteria for liquefaction of silty soils. Proceedings of the 12^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Auckland, New Zealand, paper 0312.
   Google Scholar
• Andrus RD. 1994. In-situ characterization of gravelly soils that liquefied in the 1983 Borah Peak Earthquake [PhD Dissertation]. University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D1586-11, Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir S, Sucuoglu H, Yilmaz T. 2002. An overview of local site effects and the associated building damage in Adapazarı during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am. 92(1):509–526.
   Google Scholar
• Balakani LM, Moskvina AG. 2004. Seismogenic zones of eastern Anatolia and the Dead Sea rift: probable locations of future large earthquakes. Izv Phys Solid Earth. 40(12):972–990.
   Google Scholar
• Beroya MAA, Aydin A. 2008. Seismic hazard analysis of Laoag City, Northern Philippines for liquefaction potential assessment. Eng Geol. 96(1–2):28–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalar AF. 2006. An overview of earthquake ground response analysis: A case study of Gaziantep city, Turkey: IAEG The Geological Society of London, paper number 753.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalar AF. 2008. An assessment of earthquake hazard in Gaziantep, Turkey. EJGE. Volume 13, Bundle F, Paper 6.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalar AF. 2010. Applications of the oedometer, triaxial and resonant column tests to the study of micaceous sands. Eng Geol. 112(1–4):21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalar AF, Hasan RA. 2013. Compressional behaviour of various size/shape sand-clay mixtures with different pore fluids. Eng Geol. 164:36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalar AF, Mustafa WS. 2015. Fall-cone tests on clay-sand mixtures. Eng Geol. 192:154–165.
   Google Scholar
• Cabalar AF, Mustafa WS. 2017. Behaviour of sand-clay mixtures for road pavement subgrade. Int J Pave Eng. 18(8):714–726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1121782
   Google Scholar
• Campbell KW. 1997. Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismol Res Lett. 68(1):154–179.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin H, Guneyli H, Mayer L. 2003. Paleoseismology of the Palu-Lake Hazar segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics. 374(3–4):163–197.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin KO, Youd TL, Bray JD, Seed RB, Sancio RB, Lettis W, Yilmaz MT, Stewarst JP, Durgunoglu HT, Onalp A. 2002. Liquefaction-induced ground deformation at Hotel Sapanca during Izmit-Turkey Earthquake. J. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 22(9–12):1083–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin KO, Seed RB, Der Kiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Kayen RE, Moss RES. 2004. SPT-Based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 130(12):1314–1340.
   Google Scholar
• Chorowicz J, Dhont D, Ammar O, Rukieh M, Bilal A. 2005. Tectonics of the Pliocene Homs basalts (Syria) and implications for the Dead Sea Fault Zone activity. J Geol Soc. 162(2):259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton CRI, Hight DW, Hopper RJ. 1992. Progressive destructuring of Bothkennar clay: implications for sampling and reconsolidation procedures. Géotechnique. 42(2):219–240.
   Google Scholar
• Dai FC, Lee CF, Zhang XH. 2001. GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: a case study. Eng Geol. 61(4):257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey JF, Şengör AMC. 1979. Aegean and surrounding regions: complex multi-plate and continuum tectonic in a convergent zone. Geol Soc Am Bull. 90(1):84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Erdik M, Doyuran V, Akkaş N, Gülkan P. 1985. A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. Tectonophysics. 117(3–4):295.
   Google Scholar
• Ergin K, Guclu U, Uz Z. 1967. A catalogue of earthquakes for Turkey and surrounding area (11AD to 1964AD). Tech Univ Mining Eng Fac Publ. 24:189.
   Google Scholar
• Garfunkel Z, Zak I, Freund R. 1981. Active faulting in the Dead Sea rift. Tectonophysics. 80(1–4):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gul M, Darbas G, Gurbus K. 2005. Tectono-Stratigraphic position of Alacik Formation (Latest Middle Eocene – Early Miocene) in the Kahraman Maras Basin. In Turkish with English abstract and summary. Istanbul Uni Müh Fak Q18 Yerbilimleri Dergisi. 18:183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Gursoy H, Tatar O, Piper JDA, Heimann A, Mesci L. 2003. Neotectonic deformation linking the east Anatolian and Karatas- Osmaniye intercontinental transform fault zones in the Gulf of Iskenderun, southern Turkey, deduced from paleomagnetic study of the Ceyhan-Osmaniye volcanics. Tectonics. 22(6):1067.
   Google Scholar
• Hight DW, Boese R, Butcher AP, Clayton CRI, Smith PR. 1992. Disturbance of Bothkennar clay prior to laboratory testing. Géotechnique. 42(2):199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer TL. 1998. The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989– Liquefaction, USGS Professional Paper 1551-B, pp. 314, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hüsing SK, Zachariasse WJ, Hinsbergen D, Krijgsman W, Inceoz M, Harzhauser M, Mandic O, Kroh A, 2009. Oligocene-Miocene basin evolution in SE Anatolia, Turkey: constraints on the closure of the eastern Tethys gateway. In: Van Hinsbergen DJJ, Edwards MA, Govers R, editors. Collision and collapse at the Africa–Arabia–Eurasia Subduction Zone. Vol 311.The Geological Society, London: Special Publications; p. 107–132. 0305-8719/09/$15.00 # The Geological Society of London 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Finn WDL, Ledbetter RH, Wu G. 1994. Liquefaction in silty soils: design and analysis. In: S. Prakash & P. Dakoulas (eds), Ground failures under seismic conditions. New York: Geotechnical Special Publication 44, ASCE; p. 51–76.
   Google Scholar
• Idriss IM, Boulanger RW. 2006. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 26(2–4):115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Idriss IM, Boulanger RW. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. EERI Publication, Monograph MNO-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland. https://www.eeri.org/
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki T. 1986. Soil liquefaction studies in Japan: state of the art. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 5(1):1–71.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson J, McKenzie DP. 1988. The relationship between plate motion and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle-East. Geophys J R Astron Soc. 93(1):45–73.
   Google Scholar
• Karig DE, Kozlu H. 1990. Late Paleogene-Neogene evolution of the triple junction region near Maras, south-central Turkey. J Geol Soc London. 147(6):1023–1034.
   Google Scholar
• La Rosa D. 2014. Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecol Indic. 42:122–134.
   Google Scholar
• Lee WF, Ishihara K, Chen CC. 2012. Liquefaction of silty sand, preliminary studies from recent Taiwan, New Zeland, and Japan Earthquakes. One Year after 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake: International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the Giant Earthquake, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Liao SSC, Veneziano D, Whitman RV. 1988. Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability. J Geotech Eng. 114(4):389–409.
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Prog Plann. 62(1):3–65.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini F, Stecchi F, Gabbianelli G. 2009. GIS-based assessment of risk due to salt mining activities at Tuzla (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Eng Geol. 109(34):170–182.
   Google Scholar
• Mansoor NM, Niemi TM, Misra A. 2004. A GIS based assessment of liquefaction potential of the city of Aqaba, Jordan. Environ Eng Geosci. 10(4):297–320.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie DP. 1970. Plate tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Nature. 226(5242):239–243.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie DP. 1972. Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Geophys JR Astron Soc. 30(2):109–185.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Reconstruction and Settlement. 1996. Seismic Hazard Map of Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell JK, Soga K. 2005. Fundamentals of soil behavior. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; p. 577.
   Google Scholar
• Mhaske SY, Choudhury D. 2010. GIS-based soil liquefaction susceptibility map of Mumbai city for earthquake events. J Appl Geophys. 70(3):216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Monkul MM, Ozden G. 2007. Compressional behavior of clayey sand and transition fines content. Eng Geol. 89(3–4):195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Muduli PK, Das SK. 2014. Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil based on standard penetration test using multi-gene genetic programming model. Acta Geophys. 62(3):529–543.
   Google Scholar
• Muduli PK, Das SK, Bhattacharya S. 2014. CPT-based probabilistic evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential using, multi-gene genetic programming. Georisk. 8(1):14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Muduli PK, Das SK. 2015a. Model uncertainty of SPT-based method for evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential using multi-gene genetic programming. Soils Found. 55(2):258–275.
   Google Scholar
• Muduli PK, Das SK. 2015b. First order reliability method for probabilistic evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil using genetic programming. Int J Geomech. 15(3):04014052.
   Google Scholar
• Naeini SA, Baziar MH. 2004. Effect of fines content on steady state strength of mixed and layered samples of sand. J Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 24(3):181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbant SS, McCloskey J, Steacy S, Barka AA. 2002. Stress accumulation and increased seismic risk in eastern Turkey. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 195(3–4):291–298.
   Google Scholar
• NCEER. 1997. Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Edited by Youd, T. L., Idriss, I. M., Technical Report No. NCEER-97-0022, December 31, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolakaki P. 2004. A GIS site-selection process for habitat creation: estimating connectivity of habitat patches. Landscape Urban Plann. 68(1):77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ohsaki Y. 1966. Niigata Earthquakes, 1964, building damage and soil conditions. Soils Found. 6(2):14–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcep F, Tezel O, Asci M. 2009. Correlation between electrical resistivity and soil-water content: Istanbul and Golcuk. International Journal of Physical Sciences . 4(6):362–365.
   Google Scholar
• Orgulu G, Aktar M, Turkelli N, Sandvol E, Barazangi M. 2003. Contribution to the seismotectonics of the Eastern Anatolian Plateau from moderate and small size events. Geophys Res Lett. 30/ 24:8040.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson A, Unlügenç ÜC, İnan N, Taşli K. 2004. The Misis-Andirin Complex: a Midtertiary melange related to late-stage subduction of the Southern Neotethys in S Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci. 22(5):413–453.
   Google Scholar
• Saroglu F, Emre O, Kuscu I. 1992. The East Anatolian fault zone of Turkey. Ann Tectonicae. VI:99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Seed HB, Idriss IM. 1967. Analysis of soil liquefaction: Niigata earthquake. J Soil Mech Foundation Div Proc ASCE SM3. 93:83–108.
   Google Scholar
• Seed HB, Idriss IM. 1971. Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 97 (SM9), Proc. Paper 8371, September 1971, 1249–1273.
   Google Scholar
• Seed HB, De Alba, PM. 1986. Use of SPT and CPT tests for Evaluating the Liquefaction Resistance of Sands. Proc., INSITU’86, ASCE Special Conference on Use of In Situ testing in Geotechnical Engineering, Spec. Publ. No. 6, ASCE, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Seed HB, Idriss IM. 1982. Ground motion and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA, USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph Series, p. 134.
   Google Scholar
• Seed RB, Cetin KO, Moss RES, Kammerer AM, Wu J, Pestana JM, Riemer MF, Sancio RB, Bray JD, Kayen RE, and Faris A. 2003. Recent Advances in Soil Liquefaction Engineering: A Unified and Consistent Framework. 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar, Keynote Presentation, H.M.S. Queen Mary, Long Beach, California, April 30, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM. 1985. Influence of SPT Procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng. 111(12):1425–1445.
   Google Scholar
• Senel M. 2002. Geological Map of Turkey, Ankara, MTA.
   Google Scholar
• Sengor AMC, Yilmaz Y. 1981. Tethyan evolution of Turkey. A plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics. 75:181–241.
   Google Scholar
• Sieberg A. 1932. Erdbebengeographic. In: Gutenberg B., editors. Handbuch der Geophysic, Bands IV. Berlin: Borntrager; p. 527–1005.
   Google Scholar
• Tatar O, Piper JDA, Gursoy H, Heimann A, Kocbulut F. 2004. Neotectonic deformation in the transition zone between the Dead Sea Transform and the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Southern Turkey: a paleomagnetic study of the Karasu Rift volcanism. Tectonophysics. 385(1–4):17–43.
   Google Scholar
• Thevanayagam S. 1998. Effect of fines on confining stress on undrained shear strength of silty sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 124(6):479–491. ASCE
   Google Scholar
• Thevanayagam S, Martin GR. 2002. Liquefaction in silty soils- screening and remediation issues. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 22(9–12):1035–1042.
   Google Scholar
• Toprak S, Holzer TL, Bennett MJ, Tinsley JC. 1999. CPT- and SPT-based Probabilistic Assessment of Liquefaction Potential. Proceedings of Seventh U.S.-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures Against Liquefaction, MCEER, Seattle, 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun H, Seyrek E, Orhan A, Savaş H, Türköz M. 2011. Soil liquefaction in Eskisehir, NW Turkey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 11(4):1071–1082.
   Google Scholar
• Turkelli N, Sandvol E, Zor E, Gok R, Bekler T, Al-Lazki A, Karabulut H, Kuleli S, Eken T, Gurbuz C, et al. 2003. Seismogenic zones in eastern Turkey. Geophys Res Lett. 30(24):8039.
   Google Scholar
• Westaway R. 1994. Present-day kinematics of the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean. J Geophys Res. 99(B6):12071–12090.
   Google Scholar
• Westaway R. 2003. Kinematics of the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean updated. Turk J Earth Sci. 12:5–46.
   Google Scholar
• Willis B. 1928. Earthquakes in the Holy Land. Bull Seism Soc Am. 18:73–103.
   Google Scholar
• Yalcin A, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H. 2008. Liquefaction severity map for Aksaray city center (Central Anatolia, Turkey). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 8(4):641–649.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz Y. 1993. New evidence and model on the evolution of the southeast Anatolian orogeny. Geol Soc Am Bull. 105(2):251–271.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz H, Over S, Ozden S. 2006. Kinematics of the East Anatolian Fault Zone between Turkoglu (Kahramanmaras) and Celikhan (Adiyaman), eastern Turkey. Earth Planet Space. 58(11):1463–1473.
   Google Scholar
• Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Finn WDL, Harder LF, Hynes ME, et al. 2001. Liquefaction resistance of soils, Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998, NCEER/NSF workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng-ASCE. 127(10):817–833.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Yang SH, Andrus RD, Juang H. 2003. Liquefaction induced ground failure: a study of the Chi-Chi earthquake cases. Eng Geol. 17(1–2):141–155.
   Google Scholar
• Yurtmen S, Guillou H, Westaway R, Rowbotham G, Tatar O. 2002. Rate of strike-slip motion on the Amanos Fault (Karasu Valley, southern Turkey) constrained by K-Ar dating and geochemical analysis of Quaternary basalts. Tectonophysics. 344(3–4):207–246.
   Google Scholar