Assessment of check dams’ role in flood hazard mapping in a semi-arid environment

References

• Abbasi NA, Xu X, Lucas-Borja ME, Dang W, Liu B. 2019. The use of check dams in watershed management projects: examples from around the world. Sci Total Environ. 676:683–691.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Juaidi AE, Nassar AM, Al-Juaidi OE. 2018. Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping using logistic regression and GIS conditioning factors. Arab J Geosci. 11:765.
   Google Scholar
• Boix‐Fayos C, de Vente J, Martínez‐Mena M, Barberá GG, Castillo V. 2008. The impact of land use change and check‐dams on catchment sediment yield. Hydrol Process J. 22:4922–4935.
   Google Scholar
• Bombino G, Gurnell A, Tamburino V, Zema D, Zimbone S. 2008. Sediment size variation in torrents with check dams: effects on riparian vegetation. Ecol Eng. 32(2):166–177.
   Google Scholar
• Bombino G, Gurnell A, Tamburino V, Zema D, Zimbone S. 2009. Adjustments in channel form, sediment calibre and vegetation around check‐dams in the headwater reaches of mountain torrents, Calabria, Italy. Earth Surf Process Landf. 34:1011–1021.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty A, Joshi P. 2016. Mapping disaster vulnerability in India using analytical hierarchy process. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 7(1):308–325.
   Google Scholar
• Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Pham BT, Khosravi K. 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Model Softw. 95:229–245.
   Google Scholar
• Costache R. 2019. Flash-flood Potential Index mapping using weights of evidence, decision Trees models and their novel hybrid integration. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 33(7):1375–1402.
   Google Scholar
• Elmahdy SI, Mostafa MM. 2013. Natural hazards susceptibility mapping in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: an assessment using remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS). Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 4(1):71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández D, Lutz M. 2010. Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol. 111(1–4):90–98.
   Google Scholar
• FitzHugh TW, Vogel RM. 2011. The impact of dams on flood flows in the United States. River Res Appl. 27(10):1192–1215.
   Google Scholar
• Gan B-R, Liu X-N, Yang X-G, Wang X-K, Zhou J-W. 2018. The impact of human activities on the occurrence of mountain flood hazards: lessons from the 17 August 2015 flash flood/debris flow event in Xuyong County, south-western China. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 9(1):816–840.
   Google Scholar
• Ge H, Huang Z, Wang Y, Li J. 2013. Application of fuzzy optimization model based on entropy weight in typical flood hydrograph selection. J Hydrol Eng. 18(11):1400–1407.
   Google Scholar
• Gigović L, Pamučar D, Bajić Z, Drobnjak S. 2017. Application of GIS-interval rough AHP methodology for flood hazard mapping in urban areas. Water. 9(6):360.
   Google Scholar
• Guo E, Zhang J, Ren X, Zhang Q, Sun Z. 2014. Integrated risk assessment of flood disaster based on improved set pair analysis and the variable fuzzy set theory in central Liaoning Province, China. Nat Hazards. 74(2):947–965.
   Google Scholar
• Hazarika N, Barman D, Das A, Sarma A, Borah S. 2018. Assessing and mapping flood hazard, vulnerability and risk in the Upper Brahmaputra River valley using stakeholders’ knowledge and multicriteria evaluation (MCE). J Flood Risk Management. 11:S700–S716.
   Google Scholar
• Ildoromi AR, Sepehri M, Malekinezhad H, Kiani-Harchegani M, Ghahramani A, Hosseini SZ, Artimani MM. 2019. Application of multi-criteria decision making and GIS for check dam Layout in the Ilanlu Basin, Northwest of Hamadan Province, Iran. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2019.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Jeon J-J, Sung JH, Chung E-S. 2016. Abrupt change point detection of annual maximum precipitation using fused lasso. J Hydrol. 538:831–841.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantari Z, Nickman A, Lyon SW, Olofsson B, Folkeson L. 2014. A method for mapping flood hazard along roads. J Environ Manag. 133:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kawachi T, Maruyama T, Singh VP. 2001. Rainfall entropy for delineation of water resources zones in Japan. J Hydrol. 246(1–4):36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T. 2015. Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process: application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece. Sci Total Environ. 538:555–563.
   Google Scholar
• Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A. 2012. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. 67(1):251–264.
   Google Scholar
• Lai C, Chen X, Chen X, Wang Z, Wu X, Zhao S. 2015. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory. Nat Hazards. 77(2):1243–1259.
   Google Scholar
• Langdale GW, Shrader W. 1982. Soil erosion effects on soil productivity of cultivated cropland. Chapter 4 in Determinants of soil loss tolerance. American Society of Agronomy special publication no. 45. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Yu P, Sun S, Wang Y-R. 2010. Entropy weight based fuzzy matter element model for evaluating and zoning of regional flood disaster vulnerability. J Nat Disaster. 19:124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J-F, Li J, Liu J, Cao R. 2008. Integrated GIS/AHP-based flood risk assessment: a case study of Huaihe River Basin in China. J Nat Disaster. 17:110–114.
   Google Scholar
• Lotfi FH, Fallahnejad R. 2010. Imprecise Shannon’s entropy and multi attribute decision making. Entropy. 12(1):53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ma X, Lu X, Van Noordwijk M, Li J, Xu J. 2014. Attribution of climate change, vegetation restoration, and engineering measures to the reduction of suspended sediment in the Kejie catchment, southwest China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 18(5):1979–1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud SH, Gan TY. 2018. Multi-criteria approach to develop flood susceptibility maps in arid regions of Middle East. J Clean Prod. 196:216–229.
   Google Scholar
• Malekinezhad H, Talebi A, Ilderomi AR, Hosseini SZ, Sepehri M. 2017. Flood hazard mapping using fractal dimension of drainage network in Hamadan City, Iran. J Environ Eng Sci. 12(4):86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Mamedov AI, Levy GJ. 2019. Soil erosion–runoff relations on cultivated land: insights from laboratory studies. Eur J Soil Sci. 70(3):686–696.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot BB. 1982. The fractal geometry of nature. New York: WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Matheswaran K, Alahacoon N, Pandey R, Amarnath G. 2019. Flood risk assessment in South Asia to prioritize flood index insurance applications in Bihar, India. Geomatic Nat Hazard Risk. 10(1):26–48.
   Google Scholar
• Militino AF, Ugarte MD, Pérez-Goya U. 2018. Detecting change-points in the time series of surfaces occupied by pre-defined NDVI categories in continental Spain from 1981 to 2015. In: The mathematics of the uncertain. Switzerland: Springer; p. 295–307.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuyama T. 2008. Structural countermeasures for debris flow disasters. IJECE Eng. 1(2):38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RP, Rickson RJ. 2003. Slope stabilization and erosion control: a bioengineering approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Novelo-Casanova DA, Rodríguez-Vangort F. 2016. Flood risk assessment. Case of study: Motozintla de Mendoza, Chiapas, Mexico. Geomatic Nat Hazard Risk. 7(5):1538–1556.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Burgess M. 2013. Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture. 3(3):443–463.
   Google Scholar
• Quinteiro P, Van de Broek M, Dias AC, Ridoutt BG, Govers G, Arroja L. 2017. Life cycle impacts of topsoil erosion on aquatic biota: case study on Eucalyptus globulus forest. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 22(2):159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi T, Coulibaly P. 2013. Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: review of regionalization methods. J Hydrol Eng. 18(8):958–975.
   Google Scholar
• Roshani R. 2003. Evaluating the effect of check dams on flood peaks to optimise the flood control measures (Kan case study in Iran). Enschede: The Netherlands: International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation. 54 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sepehri M, Ildoromi AR, Malekinezhad H, Hosseini SZ, Talebi A, Goodarzi S. 2017. Flood hazard mapping for the gonbad chi region, Iran. J Environ Eng Sci. 12(1):16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sepehri M, Malekinezhad H, Hosseini SZ, Ildoromi AR. 2019a. Suburban flood hazard mapping in Hamadan city, Iran. Proc Inst Civil Eng. doi: 10.1680/jmuen.17.00029
   Google Scholar
• Sepehri M, Malekinezhad H, Hosseini SZ, Ildoromi AR. 2019b. Assessment of flood hazard mapping in urban areas using entropy weighting method: a case study in Hamadan city, Iran. Acta Geophys. 67(5):1435–1449.
   Google Scholar
• Sepehri M, Malekinezhad H, Ilderomi AR, Talebi A, Hosseini SZ. 2018. Studying the effect of rain water harvesting from roof surfaces on runoff and household consumption reduction. Sustain Cities Soc. 43:317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Shieh C-L, Guh Y-R, Wang S-Q. 2007. The application of range of variability approach to the assessment of a check dam on riverine habitat alteration. Environ Geol. 52(3):427–435.
   Google Scholar
• Siahkamari S, Haghizadeh A, Zeinivand H, Tahmasebipour N, Rahmati O. 2018. Spatial prediction of flood-susceptible areas using frequency ratio and maximum entropy models. Geocarto Int. 33(9):927–941.
   Google Scholar
• Singh V. 1997. The use of entropy in hydrology and water resources. Hydrol Process. 11(6):587–626.
   Google Scholar
• Sivapalan M. 2003. Prediction in ungauged basins: a grand challenge for theoretical hydrology. Hydrol Process. 17(15):3163–3170.
   Google Scholar
• Skilodimou HD, Bathrellos GD, Chousianitis K, Youssef AM, Pradhan B. 2019. Multi-hazard assessment modeling via multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study. Environ Earth Sci. 78(2):47.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson M. 1989. Cognitive science. In: Ignorance and uncertainty: emerging paradigms. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3628-3.
   Google Scholar
• Smith K, Ward R. 1998. Mitigating and Managing Flood Losses. Floods: Physical Processes and Human Impacts. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanidis S, Stathis D. 2013. Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Nat Hazards. 68(2):569–585.
   Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Jones S, Shabani F. 2019. Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques. Catena. 175:174–192.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener T, Wheater H, Gupta HV. 2004. Rainfall-runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Wang G, Liu J, Kubota J, Chen L. 2007. Effects of land‐use changes on hydrological processes in the middle basin of the Heihe River, northwest China. Hydrol Process. 21(10):1370–1382.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Lai C, Chen X, Yang B, Zhao S, Bai X. 2015. Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. J. Hydrol. 527:1130–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Wu C, Wang Y, Tang Y, Huang Q, Jin J. 2012. Variable fuzzy recognition model for the flood hazard assessment based on Set Pair Analysis. J Northwest A F Univ. 40:221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Wu M, Ge W, Li Z, Wu Z, Zhang H, Li J, Pan Y. 2019. Improved set pair analysis and its application to environmental impact evaluation of dam break. Water. 11(4):821.
   Google Scholar
• Xie P, Gu H, Sang Y-F, Wu Z, Singh VP. 2019. Comparison of different methods for detecting change points in hydroclimatic time series. J Hydrol. 577:123973.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdi J, Moghaddam MS, Saghafian B. 2018. Optimal design of check dams in mountainous watersheds for flood mitigation. Water Res Manage. 32(14):4793–4811.
   Google Scholar
• Yin H, Li C. 2001. Human impact on floods and flood disasters on the Yangtze River. Geomorphology. 41(2–3):105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA, Klir GJ, Yuan B. 1996. Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Zaharia L, Costache R, Prăvălie R, Ioana-Toroimac G. 2017. Mapping flood and flooding potential indices: a methodological approach to identifying areas susceptible to flood and flooding risk. Case study: the Prahova catchment (Romania). Front Earth Sci. 11(2):229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Zema DA, Bombino G, Denisi P, Lucas-Borja ME, Zimbone SM. 2018. Evaluating the effects of check dams on channel geometry, bed sediment size and riparian vegetation in Mediterranean mountain torrents. Sci Total Environ. 642:327–340.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng R, Chen H-K, Li J-Y. 2010. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy in road flood risk assessment. Chongqing Jiotong Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban). 29:587–591.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Leng G, Huang M. 2018. Impacts of future climate change on urban flood volumes in Hohhot in northern China: benefits of climate change mitigation and adaptations. Hydr and Ear Syst Scie. 22:305–316.
   Google Scholar