Effect of contact angle hysteresis on measuring matric suction in unsaturated sandy soil

References

• Alves RD, Gitirana G de FN, Vanapalli SK. 2020. Advances in the modeling of the soil–water characteristic curve using pore-scale analysis. Comput Geotech. 127(July):103766. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103766.
   Google Scholar
• Anandarajah A, Amarasinghe PM. 2012. Microstructural Investigation of Soil Suction and Hysteresis of Fine-Grained Soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 138(1):38–46. doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker R, Frydman S. 2009. Unsaturated soil mechanics. Critical Review of Physical Foundations. Eng Geol. 106(1–2):26–39. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broesch DJ, Frechette J. 2012. From concave to convex: capillary bridges in slit pore geometry. Langmuir. 28(44):15548–15554. doi:10.1021/la302942k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Jiang Y, Sun B, Zhou H, Hallett PD. 2022. Organic manure and lime change water vapour sorption of a red soil by altering water repellency and specific surface area. Europ J Soil Sci. 73(2):13223. doi:10.1111/ejss.13223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Chen K, Yang M. 2020. A new hysteresis model of the water retention curve based on pore expansion and contraction. Comput Geotech. 121(April 2019):103482. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103482.
   Google Scholar
• Chen P, Lu N, Wei C. 2019. General scanning hysteresis model for soil–water retention curves. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 145(12):04019116. doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhao Y, Gao H, Zheng J. 2011. Liquid bridge force between two unequal-sized spheres or a sphere and a plane. Particuology. 9(4):374–380. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2010.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czachor H, Doerr SH, Lichner L. 2010. Water retention of repellent and subcritical repellent soils: new insights from model and experimental investigations. J Hydrol. 380(1–2):104–111. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos E, Durner W. 2013. Physically-based model of soil hydraulic properties accounting for variable contact angle and its effect on hysteresis. Adv Water Resour. 59:169–180. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl D. 2013. Soil water repellency: dynamics of heterogeneous surfaces. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 432:8–18. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont JB, Legendre D. 2010. Numerical simulation of static and sliding drop with contact angle hysteresis. J Comput Phys. 229(7):2453–2478. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Toledano JC, Blake TD, Lambert P, De Coninck J. 2017. On the cohesion of fluids and their adhesion to solids: young’s equation at the atomic scale. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 245(2016):102–107. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2017.03.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartmann M, Hardt S. 2019. Stability of Evaporating Droplets on Chemically Patterned Surfaces. Langmuir. 35(14):4868–4875. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhtamaki T, Tian XL, Korhonen JT, Ras RHA. 2018. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nat Protoc. 13(7):1521–1538. doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunyh T, Muradoglu M, Liew OW, Ng TW. 2013. Contact angle and volume retention effects from capillary bridge evaporation in biochemical microplating. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 436:647–655. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.07.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Jiang Y, Zhu X, Wang Y. 2020. Investigation of aluminate coupling agent as modifier and its application on improving flame retardant of intumescent flame retardant coatings. Macromol Res. 28(S1):1211–1219. doi:10.1007/s13233-020-8165-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kabiri B, Norouzbeigi R, Velayi E. 2022. Efficient oil/water separation using grass-like nano-cobalt oxide bioinspired dual-structured coated mesh filters. Surf Interfaces. 30:101825. doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2022.101825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leelamanie DAL, Karube J. 2009. Time dependence of contact angle and its relation to repellency persistence in hydrophobized sand. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 55(4):457–461. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2009.00387.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leelamanie DAL, Karube J, Yoshida A. 2008. Characterizing water repellency indices: contact angle and water drop penetration time of hydrohobized sand. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 54(2):179–187. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00232.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li X. 2022. A hysteresis model for soil-water characteristic curve based on dynamic contact angle theory. Geomech Eng. 28(2):107–116. doi:10.12989/gae.2022.28.2.107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe MA, McGrath G, Leopold M. 2021. The impact of soil water repellency and slope upon runoff and erosion. Soil Tillage Res. 205(July 2020):104756. doi:10.1016/j.still.2020.104756.
   Google Scholar
• Megias-Alguacil D, Gauckler LJ. 2010. Analysis of the capillary forces between two small solid spheres binded by a convex liquid bridge. Powder Technol. 198(2):211–218. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemi AH, Majnooni-Heris A. 2012. A mathematical model for the interactions between non-identical rough spheres, liquid bridge and liquid vapor. J Colloid Interface Sci. 369(1):402–410. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.11.051.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng CWW, Pang YW. 2000. Influence of stress state on soil-water characteristics and slope stability. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng. 126(2):157–166. doi:1090-0241/00/0002-0157–0166.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HNG, Millet O, Gagneux G. 2019. Liquid bridges between a sphere and a plane – Classification of meniscus profiles for unknown capillary pressure. Math Mech Solids. 24(10):3042–3060. doi:10.1177/1081286519831047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HNG, Zhao CF, Millet O, Gagneux G. 2020. An original method for measuring liquid surface tension from capillary bridges between two equal-sized spherical particles. Powder Technol. 363:349–359. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TAH, Nguyen AV, Hampton MA, Xu ZP, Huang L, Rudolph V. 2012. Theoretical and experimental analysis of droplet evaporation on solid surfaces. Chem Eng Sci. 69(1):522–529. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlov IN, Raskovskaya IL, Tolkachev AV. 2017. Structure of the surface microrelief of a droplet evaporating from a rough substrate as a possible cause of contact angle hysteresis. J Exp Theor Phys. 124(4):570–579. doi:10.1134/S1063776117030141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroso DM, Williams DJ. 2010. A novel approach for modelling soil-water characteristic curves with hysteresis. Comput Geotech. 37(3):374–380. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piyaruwan HIGS, Leelamanie DAL. 2020. Existence of water repellency and its relation to structural stability of soils in a tropical Eucalyptus plantation forest. Geoderma. 380(April):114679. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114679.
   Google Scholar
• Qiang-Nian L, Jia-Qi Z, Feng-Xi Z. 2017. Exact solution for capillary bridges properties by shooting method. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. 72(4):315–320. doi:10.1515/zna-2016-0400.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Flores JC, Bachmann J, Marmur A. 2010. Direct determination of contact angles of model soils in comparison with wettability characterization by capillary rise. J Hydrol. 382(1–4):10–19. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Flores JC, Woche SK, Bachmann J, Goebel MO, Hallett PD. 2008. Comparing capillary rise contact angles of soil aggregates and homogenized soil. Geoderma. 146(1–2):336–343. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.05.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satvati S, Alimohammadi H, Rowshanzamir M, Hejazi SM. 2020. Bearing capacity of shallow footings reinforced with braid and geogrid adjacent to soil slope. Int J of Geosynth and Ground Eng. 6(4):1–12. doi:10.1007/s40891-020-00226-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saulick Y, Lourenço SDN, Baudet BA, Woche SK, Bachmann J. 2018. Physical properties controlling water repellency in synthesized granular solids. Eur J Soil Sci. 69(4):698–709. doi:10.1111/ejss.12555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenov S, Trybala A, Agogo H, Kovalchuk N, Ortega F, Rubio RG, Starov VM, Velarde MG. 2013. Evaporation of droplets of surfactant solutions. Langmuir. 29(32):10028–10036. doi:10.1021/la401578v.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Jiang M, Thornton C. 2016. Shear strength of unsaturated granular soils: three-dimensional discrete element analyses. Granul Matter. 18(3):e0645-x. doi:10.1007/s10035-016-0645-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Gan Y. 2017. A grain-scale model for soil-water retention hysteresis. poromechanics 2017 – proceedings of the 6th biot conference on poromechanics, 457–464. doi:10.1061/9780784480779.056.
   Google Scholar
• Song XY, Zhang Z. 2022. Determination of clay-water contact angle via molecular dynamics and deep-learning enhanced methods. Acta Geotech. 17(2):511–525. doi:10.1007/s11440-021-01238-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song YS, Hong S. 2020. Effect of clay minerals on the suction stress of unsaturated soils. Eng Geol. 269(April 2019):105571. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105571.
   Google Scholar
• Toll DG, Lourenço SDN, Mendes J. 2013. Advances in suction measurements using high suction tensiometers. Eng Geol. 165:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelmann ES, Reichert JM, Prevedello J, Consensa COB, Oliveira AÉ, Awe GO, Mataix-Solera J. 2013. Threshold water content beyond which hydrophobic soils become hydrophilic: the role of soil texture and organic matter content. Geoderma. 209–210:177–187. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Yang S. 2018. Effect of soil suction test method on soil water characteristic curve. Water Saving Irrig. 276(8):5–8. doi:1007-4929(2018) 08-0005-04.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Michielsen S, Lee HJ. 2013. Symmetric and asymmetric capillary bridges between a rough surface and a parallel surface. Langmuir. 29(35):11028–11037. doi:10.1021/la401324f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan A, Kechavarzi C, Coulon F, Doerr SH. 2015. Experimental characterization of the impact of temperature and humidity on the breakdown of soil water repellency in sandy soils and composts. Hydrol Process. 29(8):2065–2073. doi:10.1002/hyp.10305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Gong AM, Wu JH, Lu TH. 2015. Effect of contact angle on matric suction of unsaturated soil. Rock Soil Mech. 36(3):674–678. doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2015.03.010.
   Google Scholar
• Yang S, Lu TH. 2012. Study of soil-water characteristic curve using microscopic spherical particle model. Pedosphere. 22(1):103–111. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60196-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Wu J, Dong H, Zhang Y. 2016. Soil water repellency of sands and clay as affected by particle size. Acta Pedologica. Sinica(2):6. doi:10.11766/trxb201506170181.
   Google Scholar
• Yang S, Wu J, Huang J, Dong H. 2016. Effects of contact angle on suction measurement with tensiometers and axis-translation technique in unsaturated soils. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chin J Rock Mech Eng. 35:3331–3336. doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.0844.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai Q, Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Dai G. 2020a. Estimation of the soil-water characteristic curve from the grain size distribution of coarse-grained soils. Eng Geol. 267:105502. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai Q, Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Dai G. 2020b. Estimation of tensile strength of sandy soil from soil–water characteristic curve. Acta Geotech. 15(12):3371–3381. doi:10.1007/s11440-020-01013-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai Q, Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Dai G, Du Y. 2020. Estimation of the wetting scanning curves for sandy soils. Eng Geol. 272:105635. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, Qian, Rahardjo, Harianto, Satyanaga, Alfrendo, Dai, Guo-liang, Priono,. 2019. Role of the pore-size distribution function on water flow in unsaturated soil. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A. 20(1):10–20. doi:10.1631/jzus.A1800347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, He H, Alimohammadi H. 2021. Three-dimensional Wadell roundness for particle angularity characterization of granular soils. Acta Geotech. 16(1):133–149. doi:10.1007/s11440-020-01004-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou AN. 2013. A contact angle-dependent hysteresis model for soil-water retention behaviour. Comput Geotech. 49:36–42. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar